The Obama administration secretly sought to give Iran brief access to the U.S. financial system.
Showing posts with label Nuclear Weapons. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nuclear Weapons. Show all posts
Thursday, June 7, 2018
Thursday, May 10, 2018
Wednesday, October 25, 2017
Monday, May 1, 2017
Aiding The Enemy
Sure, this is another classic editorial cartoon from AF Branco, which is spot on.
But much more importantly, it is the truth.
While everyone is rightfully concerned about the actions of Kim Joung Un and North Korea, there is another major geopolitical issue lurking out there.
Iran; the head of the snake.
Thanks to the ridiculous Iran deal Obama orchestrated and implemented, Iran is closer than ever to gaining nuclear weapons status.
Most would consider as TREASON a high ranking government official knowingly and deceptively aiding and abetting a known enemy to the government they represent.
Obama's actions in orchestrating and facilitating the deal with Iran, who pledges to destroy America on a daily basis, are without question treasonous.
Learn more from Mark Levin, who discusses a bombshell article in, of all places, Politico, where, "In “Obama’s hidden Iran deal giveaway,” Josh Meyer reports that when President Obama released Iranian-born prisoners to secure Iranian support for his administration’s infamous nuclear deal, he portrayed the released prisoners as simple “civilians.” “In reality,” Meyer writes, “some of them were accused by Obama’s own Justice Department of posing threats to national security.”
 |
| Obama’s hidden Iran deal giveaway |
For our nation to survive as founded, we must remain a nation of laws rather than a nation of men. That would include identifying and holding accountable those individuals who assist those aiming ill will toward the United States of America.
In my opinion, this deceitful and dangerous deal with Iran would fall into that category.
Sunday, March 15, 2015
Opponent Within
As media reports about the upcoming presidential election increase, it should be noted, Hillary Clinton, presumed to be the nominee of the Democrat party for president in 2016, has the opinion we should have empathy for our enemies.
President Obama, attempting to escape the legislative confines of the US Congress, seeks to unilaterally strike a deal, perhaps through UN action, with Iran, whose government leadership is a significant opponent of the United States and at the very best an untrustworthy player in the deadly serious arena of nuclear weaponry.
In stark contrast to decades of US foreign policy under presidents of both parties, President Obama, although speaking to the contrary, seems to be negotiating a deal which would ultimately allow Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon.
Others are taking notice, with evidence gathered from the actions, not the rhetoric. It makes one wonder if Iran and the Obama administration are coordinating their public relations efforts as well in their quest to arm Iran with a nuclear weapon.
Our conclusion is that President Obama is in favor of a caliphate being established in the region, and Iran could well be positioned by those seeking this as the leader of the new Muslim nation, similar to the old Ottoman Empire.
The utilization of the UN is an important nugget of information, as if the UN, and Obama, would be helpful to Iran gaining this position, they may be open to Obama, who may be in charge of the UN in a decade, having significant influence of the newly empowered region.
Should you be wondering about ISIS, and why little to nothing is being done by President Obama to thwart these murderous thugs, you may entertain that they consider ISIS to be performing a sort of cleansing, and when their usefulness is exhausted, they will be dealt with swift and powerful action.
Sadly, many members of the GOP really do not seem to worried about ISIS either, and therefore, we mus conclude they are in agreement with Obama. Maybe many of them are more warm and fuzzy with the Muslim Brotherhood than we think.
One former member of the GOP would be dealing with Iran, and ISIS, in a much different manner.
President Obama, attempting to escape the legislative confines of the US Congress, seeks to unilaterally strike a deal, perhaps through UN action, with Iran, whose government leadership is a significant opponent of the United States and at the very best an untrustworthy player in the deadly serious arena of nuclear weaponry.
In stark contrast to decades of US foreign policy under presidents of both parties, President Obama, although speaking to the contrary, seems to be negotiating a deal which would ultimately allow Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon.
Others are taking notice, with evidence gathered from the actions, not the rhetoric. It makes one wonder if Iran and the Obama administration are coordinating their public relations efforts as well in their quest to arm Iran with a nuclear weapon.
Our conclusion is that President Obama is in favor of a caliphate being established in the region, and Iran could well be positioned by those seeking this as the leader of the new Muslim nation, similar to the old Ottoman Empire.
The utilization of the UN is an important nugget of information, as if the UN, and Obama, would be helpful to Iran gaining this position, they may be open to Obama, who may be in charge of the UN in a decade, having significant influence of the newly empowered region.
Should you be wondering about ISIS, and why little to nothing is being done by President Obama to thwart these murderous thugs, you may entertain that they consider ISIS to be performing a sort of cleansing, and when their usefulness is exhausted, they will be dealt with swift and powerful action.
Sadly, many members of the GOP really do not seem to worried about ISIS either, and therefore, we mus conclude they are in agreement with Obama. Maybe many of them are more warm and fuzzy with the Muslim Brotherhood than we think.
One former member of the GOP would be dealing with Iran, and ISIS, in a much different manner.
Ronald Reagan knew peace would acquired by strength, not, at best, through a path of appeasement in joint ventures with dishonest brokers who plot the demise of The United States. The actions of Obama are so outside of reasonable thinking with regard to international relations, you have to give strong consideration he and Uncle Sam are not dressed in the same uniform.
The conclusion I have drawn is that Obama is indeed transforming American from what it has traditionally been molding it to his hearts desire, which if far from the vision of our founders. While BHO no doubt thinks his actions are superior to the framework of the founders, I view him as an opponent within.
Every legally permissible action should be exhausted to stop him, but it seems most of the GOP embraces their power and lacks the internal integrity to keep America a beacon of freedom guided by principles of faith and the rule of law.
Sunday, July 27, 2014
State Your Piece
I recall vividly the events of this time, prior to a presidential election in 2008, where capital markets were rocked in alarming fashion. Amid all the chaos, seemingly orchestrated, rang out the proclamations of a US Representative noting an electronic run on the banks questioning an attack of economic terrorism.
On this day, along with factual evidence of the wreckage of a collapse in value of bundled mortgages as a result of a crashing housing market, conspiracies abound on the causes on the actual influence which took the market from an aftershock downdraft of a bubble to something potentially far worse.
What had actually happened remains in question. Did a series of mutually exclusive events occur in random as part of a what could be considered a perfect storm? Was it infiltration from within, attempting to influence the election?
In recent months, former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson recently confirmed what many has long speculated, which was there was orchestrated efforts to collapse our economic system, with only the level of teamwork remaining in question. Russia and China collaborated on potential plan to destroy the US dollar.
The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody had decided not to see – Ayn Rand.
Its the Euro theatre.
While our President is seemingly disengaged from the world (he is NOT), the world is on fire. The middle east is in complete chaos, Israel is engaged in an offensive to preserve liberty for their people against HAMAS, a militant terrorist group and proxy militia of Iran, who just gets closer and closer to nuclear weapon everyday amidst all the distraction. Perhaps a reflection on the definition of the flexibility Obama described to Russian PM Medvedev would be appropriate.
Recently, Russia and China have been reported to have signed a historic gas pipeline mega deal, which could have severe economic ramifications on the US capital markets, perhaps phasing out the dollar.
After a tussle with Georgia a few years back, since the conclusion of the Olympics, Vladmir Putin and Russia have been flexing their muscles, engaging in invasive military strikes against their neighbors in the Ukraine. With the west in a weakened position, seemingly by design, the opposition to the activities of Russia goes unabated, even in the aftermath of the shooting down of a commercial passenger airline.
You may think China is watching all this with a bucket of buttered popcorn and a Coca Cola, but you would be wrong.
China has been reported to have increased and expanded naval drills in areas off the coast of Vietnam and the Philippines. China has been building its naval forces for years now, and has been found to have been lurking around America and our outposts around the world, inclusive of Taiwan and Japan.
China is pretending to be a diplomatic ally of the west even as it is actively engaging in trade pacts with Russia and subverting US military influence around its borders, and especially in regions it deems of vital national interest--Tyler Durden/Zero Hedge.
Kevin Freeman, in his book "Secret Weapon", examines the evidence linking rogue elements in Communist China, Russia, and Islamic finance to economic warfare against the United States.
Ominous warnings are everywhere, yielding appropriate concerns of The United States being on the precipice of an event, which could range from economic terrorism to the potential of another terrorist attack. It is worth noting, the latter could well initiate the former.
From John Kerry and his meeting with the opponents of Israel to President Obama's inability or unwillingness to curtail the brazen encroachment of Russia, it seems clear our leadership is not going to be much help in deterring our enemies from attacking us in various forms.
In fact, it remains unclear which side these charlatans are actually on, as they're actions are not representative of our people.
While foreign affairs are screwing us rotten
Line morale has hit rock bottom
Dying embers stand forgotten
Talks of peace were being trodden
Stand or fall
State your peace tonight
On this day, along with factual evidence of the wreckage of a collapse in value of bundled mortgages as a result of a crashing housing market, conspiracies abound on the causes on the actual influence which took the market from an aftershock downdraft of a bubble to something potentially far worse.
What had actually happened remains in question. Did a series of mutually exclusive events occur in random as part of a what could be considered a perfect storm? Was it infiltration from within, attempting to influence the election?
In recent months, former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson recently confirmed what many has long speculated, which was there was orchestrated efforts to collapse our economic system, with only the level of teamwork remaining in question. Russia and China collaborated on potential plan to destroy the US dollar.
The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody had decided not to see – Ayn Rand.
Its the Euro theatre.
While our President is seemingly disengaged from the world (he is NOT), the world is on fire. The middle east is in complete chaos, Israel is engaged in an offensive to preserve liberty for their people against HAMAS, a militant terrorist group and proxy militia of Iran, who just gets closer and closer to nuclear weapon everyday amidst all the distraction. Perhaps a reflection on the definition of the flexibility Obama described to Russian PM Medvedev would be appropriate.
Recently, Russia and China have been reported to have signed a historic gas pipeline mega deal, which could have severe economic ramifications on the US capital markets, perhaps phasing out the dollar.
After a tussle with Georgia a few years back, since the conclusion of the Olympics, Vladmir Putin and Russia have been flexing their muscles, engaging in invasive military strikes against their neighbors in the Ukraine. With the west in a weakened position, seemingly by design, the opposition to the activities of Russia goes unabated, even in the aftermath of the shooting down of a commercial passenger airline.
You may think China is watching all this with a bucket of buttered popcorn and a Coca Cola, but you would be wrong.
China has been reported to have increased and expanded naval drills in areas off the coast of Vietnam and the Philippines. China has been building its naval forces for years now, and has been found to have been lurking around America and our outposts around the world, inclusive of Taiwan and Japan.
China is pretending to be a diplomatic ally of the west even as it is actively engaging in trade pacts with Russia and subverting US military influence around its borders, and especially in regions it deems of vital national interest--Tyler Durden/Zero Hedge.
Kevin Freeman, in his book "Secret Weapon", examines the evidence linking rogue elements in Communist China, Russia, and Islamic finance to economic warfare against the United States.
From John Kerry and his meeting with the opponents of Israel to President Obama's inability or unwillingness to curtail the brazen encroachment of Russia, it seems clear our leadership is not going to be much help in deterring our enemies from attacking us in various forms.
In fact, it remains unclear which side these charlatans are actually on, as they're actions are not representative of our people.
While foreign affairs are screwing us rotten
Line morale has hit rock bottom
Dying embers stand forgotten
Talks of peace were being trodden
Stand or fall
State your peace tonight
Tuesday, November 26, 2013
Orchestrated and Historic Mistake
Watch the other hand.
While we were all contemplating putting up the Christmas decorations and watching football over the weekend, our Commander in Deceit, hard at work in transforming not only the wealth of our nation, but its sovereignty as well, secured a deal with Iran to seemingly restrict their effort in obtaining a nuclear weapon.
Surely, the administration is patting themselves all over the back for a job well done, inclusive of the ill-informed David Ignatius, but few outside of Obamabot nation are enthused. Several Democrats have voiced opposition, and while it is hard to decipher some GOP progressives from the overwhelming progressive element of the formerly sane Democratic party, all GOP members appear opposed.
Teresa Monroe-Hamilton, over on her truly outstanding blog The Noisy Room, posts an essay from Arlene from Israel expressing her feelings, shared by most, of betrayal.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu labels the "historical agreement" a historical mistake, and in our opinion, that would be gently described analysis. Among those voicing alarming displeasure are Mark Levin and Ralph Peters.
Former US UN Ambassador John Bolton, not pleased, discussed the agreement with Megyn Kelley of FOX News. Take a listen:
Many contemplate this action was a wagging the dog event, as Investors Business Deily noted "It takes something big to distract the nation from ObamaCare, the IRS scandal, Benghazi, and the Census Bureau moonlighting as Obama campaign aides — like a pact getting Islamofascist Iran to give up its nuclear program."
Over on the outstanding editorial page at Investors Business Daily, two pieces note the level of appeasement rivals few while Iran, who labels the United States as The Great Satan, is untrustworthy at best. If this action was only Neville Chamberlain style naivete. It is not, but rather orchestrated action.
Although we have questioned for some time which side the administration is on, there can be little doubt this move is a brazen act once again embracing our enemies while punching our allies in the face. It should be noted, Iran is the head of snake of terrorism, an architect of sponsored acts while supporting our enemies with weaponry and cash.
We noted, while eagerly ushering chaos in the middle east, Obama failed to act in any way against the Iran regime during the uprising by the Iranian citizens a few years back. Actions speak louder than words, and Obama acts as though he is supportive of Iranian actions on the world stage. In addition, it should be noted he may be influenced by his top advisor Valerie Jarrett, who has extensive ties to Iran through her family.
A libertarian line of thinking might conclude that Iran should be able to obtain nuclear weapons like any other nation, but that is the mindset that eliminates complete libertarianism from being a significant player on the political landscape.
Iran, as previously mentioned, is the head of the snake of terrorism. There actions on the world stage, of antagonistic rhetoric, continued violations human rights, sponsoring and engaging in terrorism and the continued defiance of international protocol identifies them as bad actors who cannot be trusted with any level of civility and responsibility demanded by those who would possess nuclear weaponry.
Although those sane in the world recognize this, President Obama, sees the playing field differently. As usual, Obama is wrong, but more alarmingly, these actions call into question, yet again, which side he is actually on. Actions demonstrate his uniform is not red, white and blue.
While we were all contemplating putting up the Christmas decorations and watching football over the weekend, our Commander in Deceit, hard at work in transforming not only the wealth of our nation, but its sovereignty as well, secured a deal with Iran to seemingly restrict their effort in obtaining a nuclear weapon.
Surely, the administration is patting themselves all over the back for a job well done, inclusive of the ill-informed David Ignatius, but few outside of Obamabot nation are enthused. Several Democrats have voiced opposition, and while it is hard to decipher some GOP progressives from the overwhelming progressive element of the formerly sane Democratic party, all GOP members appear opposed.
Teresa Monroe-Hamilton, over on her truly outstanding blog The Noisy Room, posts an essay from Arlene from Israel expressing her feelings, shared by most, of betrayal.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu labels the "historical agreement" a historical mistake, and in our opinion, that would be gently described analysis. Among those voicing alarming displeasure are Mark Levin and Ralph Peters.
Former US UN Ambassador John Bolton, not pleased, discussed the agreement with Megyn Kelley of FOX News. Take a listen:
Many contemplate this action was a wagging the dog event, as Investors Business Deily noted "It takes something big to distract the nation from ObamaCare, the IRS scandal, Benghazi, and the Census Bureau moonlighting as Obama campaign aides — like a pact getting Islamofascist Iran to give up its nuclear program."
Over on the outstanding editorial page at Investors Business Daily, two pieces note the level of appeasement rivals few while Iran, who labels the United States as The Great Satan, is untrustworthy at best. If this action was only Neville Chamberlain style naivete. It is not, but rather orchestrated action.
Although we have questioned for some time which side the administration is on, there can be little doubt this move is a brazen act once again embracing our enemies while punching our allies in the face. It should be noted, Iran is the head of snake of terrorism, an architect of sponsored acts while supporting our enemies with weaponry and cash.
We noted, while eagerly ushering chaos in the middle east, Obama failed to act in any way against the Iran regime during the uprising by the Iranian citizens a few years back. Actions speak louder than words, and Obama acts as though he is supportive of Iranian actions on the world stage. In addition, it should be noted he may be influenced by his top advisor Valerie Jarrett, who has extensive ties to Iran through her family.
A libertarian line of thinking might conclude that Iran should be able to obtain nuclear weapons like any other nation, but that is the mindset that eliminates complete libertarianism from being a significant player on the political landscape.
Iran, as previously mentioned, is the head of the snake of terrorism. There actions on the world stage, of antagonistic rhetoric, continued violations human rights, sponsoring and engaging in terrorism and the continued defiance of international protocol identifies them as bad actors who cannot be trusted with any level of civility and responsibility demanded by those who would possess nuclear weaponry.
Although those sane in the world recognize this, President Obama, sees the playing field differently. As usual, Obama is wrong, but more alarmingly, these actions call into question, yet again, which side he is actually on. Actions demonstrate his uniform is not red, white and blue.
Wednesday, August 18, 2010
Against The Wind: Israel
ISRAEL
On Tuesday, former Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton declared that Israel has eight days to launch a military strike against Iran, since it is believed that after that point, any attack will release radiation upon the Iranian citizenry.
It is disgraceful we have arrived at this point, as Iran with nuclear weapons is unacceptable.
CNBC's Larry Kudlow discussed the perilous situation with very knowledgeable source, former Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger. Take a listen:
Unfortunately, as we have written about recently, the Obama administration appears to be against Israel taking action and seems carelessly naive regarding Iran. Meanwhile, Israel is in deep danger, and I believe they have every right to defend themselves.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is an individual that completely understands the war on terror, unlike our President. I am reminded of the comments Netanyahu made shortly after 9-11:
We have received a wake up call from hell. Now the question is simple: Do we rally to defeat this evil, while there is still time, or do we press a collective snooze button and go back to business as usual? The time for action is now. Today the terrorists have the will to destroy us, but they do not have the power. There is no doubt that we have the power to crush them. Now we must also show that we have the will to do just that. Once any part of the terror network acquires nuclear weapons, this equation will fundamentally change, and with it the course of human affairs. This is the historical imperative that now confronts all of us.
----------Benjamin Netanyahu 9-20-2001
Iran has proclaimed their intention to eliminate Israel, and I believe they mean what they say. I also believe Iran has demonstrated they cannot be trusted with nuclear weapons. Therefore, given the failed policies that have lead us to this point, unlike President Obama, I support actions Israel may deem appropriate to defend themselves.
On Tuesday, former Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton declared that Israel has eight days to launch a military strike against Iran, since it is believed that after that point, any attack will release radiation upon the Iranian citizenry.
It is disgraceful we have arrived at this point, as Iran with nuclear weapons is unacceptable.
CNBC's Larry Kudlow discussed the perilous situation with very knowledgeable source, former Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger. Take a listen:
Unfortunately, as we have written about recently, the Obama administration appears to be against Israel taking action and seems carelessly naive regarding Iran. Meanwhile, Israel is in deep danger, and I believe they have every right to defend themselves.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is an individual that completely understands the war on terror, unlike our President. I am reminded of the comments Netanyahu made shortly after 9-11:
We have received a wake up call from hell. Now the question is simple: Do we rally to defeat this evil, while there is still time, or do we press a collective snooze button and go back to business as usual? The time for action is now. Today the terrorists have the will to destroy us, but they do not have the power. There is no doubt that we have the power to crush them. Now we must also show that we have the will to do just that. Once any part of the terror network acquires nuclear weapons, this equation will fundamentally change, and with it the course of human affairs. This is the historical imperative that now confronts all of us.
----------Benjamin Netanyahu 9-20-2001
Iran has proclaimed their intention to eliminate Israel, and I believe they mean what they say. I also believe Iran has demonstrated they cannot be trusted with nuclear weapons. Therefore, given the failed policies that have lead us to this point, unlike President Obama, I support actions Israel may deem appropriate to defend themselves.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
