Holding the “Scandal-Free” Obama Administration Accountable
Showing posts with label Benghazi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Benghazi. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 25, 2017
Monday, October 10, 2016
Thursday, July 28, 2016
Tuesday, November 24, 2015
Directing The Masses
 |
| Donald J. Trump |
As outlined by GOP front runner Donald Trump, with all the terrorism acts being committed around the globe, the despicable and barbaric acts being engaged upon by Planned Parenthood and the corrupt actions and blatant disregard for the law being exhibited by the Obama administration and complicit members of Congress from both sides, the media feels compelled to scold Trump on his tone.
Can you imagine?
On the surface, you might conclude the news media is so stupid they would not know a story of legitimate impact on the citizenry if it took place in the lobby of their corporate office building. But no, nobody is that idiotic.
The mainstream news media is in full command of the facts. The stories they provide and the issues they cover are all part of an agenda to lead the American people in a direction they, in the arrogance of their intellectual elitism, determines is best determined to serve the ruling class.
Fans of dystopian writers George Orwell and Aldous Huxley often engage in debate who was more correct. Orwell considered the government would conceal information from the citizenry, and engage in rewriting the history the public was able to consume. Huxley imagined a world where the citizenry would be bombarded with voluminous information that would allow such consumption which would result in the citizenry being drunk on a sea of irrelevance.
 |
| George Orwell and Aldous Huxley photo/OpenCulture.com |
Both are accurate.
Truthful information is being concealed (gun running in Benghazi), and rewritten (see unemployment rate) as Orwell imagined and the country is ever increasingly engulfed by guilty pleasures (UFC fighting) and issues and individuals of non importance (the Kardashians) as Huxley forecasted.
Meanwhile, the freedoms we hold dear are being methodically taken from us though the orchestration of evil organizations, elected officials and social justice engineers of the ruling class. And of course, the mainstream media.
Tuesday, August 25, 2015
It Does Matter
Hillary Clinton, whose email saga of lies and distortion placing the safety and welfare of America in danger continues to engage in Chinese water torture on her fledgling campaign, got into a testy exchange with Ed Henry of FOX News the other day.
As usual, Ms. Clinton was dripping in arrogance, displaying the warmth of a dead fish all while laser beaming Ed Henry with condescension. It was quite a spectacle. Take a listen:
It appears Ms. Clinton's emails were not secure, and among the items that potentially got out to those with ill intentions against America was the activities and location of one Chris Stevens, our Ambassador who was murdered in Benghazi. Did Ms. Clinton's lackadaisical treatment of information presented her result in the death of our Ambassador and fellow service men who attempted to rescue him? Sure looks to be the case.
Ms. Clinton, as we have noted many times, is a progressive socialist who thinks America as founded is the problem, and as she learned well under her mentor Saul Alinksy, she would seek the reaching of her goals by any means necessary, legal or not.
In listening to the exchange with Henry, something caught my ear. I had recently read a very interesting piece by a guy I had previously never heard of, and found it extremely compelling. We posted some analysis of the piece on our Facebook page at BAHL Revere.
The piece was titled The Disturbing Line Hillary Clinton Quoted from Her Favorite Book—and Why It Matters. It asked the following question: Is the presidential hopeful living out a theme from Dostoevsky?
The author of the piece has really discovered something extraordinary. He noted a previous interview with Hillary Clinton where "five words leapt of the screen, where they almost verbatim mirrored a key phrase in Dostoesky's book The Brothers Karamazov."
The phrase was "Everything I did was legally permitted." This phrase also turned up in the exchange with Henry, which you can go back note 0:33 seconds in. She made it a point of emphasis.
In the article, brilliantly put together by Matthew Becklo, he noted the following correlation which comes in a passage described as being about the connection between morality and a belief in immorality:
…were mankind’s belief in its immortality to be destroyed, not only love but also any living power to continue the life of the world would at once dry up in it. Not only that, but then nothing would be immoral any longer, everything would be permitted, even anthropophagy. And even that is not all: he ended with the assertion that for every separate person, like ourselves for instance, who believes neither in God nor in his own immortality, the moral law of nature ought to change immediately into the exact opposite of the former religious law, and that egoism, even to the point of evildoing, should not only be permitted to man but should be acknowledged as the necessary, the most reasonable, and all but the noblest result of his situation. (Emphasis added by the author Matthew Becklo)
This certainly implies Ms. Clinton has no belief in immortality and therefore concludes everything would be permitted. That would explain why Ms. Clinton does not feel obligated to be constrained by the laws you and I must adhere to, or feel compelled to obey any of the laws of governance in America, inclusive of laws she participated in legislating.
Enter the email scandal, where she acted with any means necessary to accomplish her objectives and deemed her actions throughout were legally permitted. Got it, thanks to Becklo.
Our language is being rewritten by the progressives. Seemingly innocuous phrases have meaningful and dangerous connotations few if any actually comprehend. Matthew Becklo caught Hillary, and it indeed does matter, as everything is not permitted.
Keep your ears open!
As usual, Ms. Clinton was dripping in arrogance, displaying the warmth of a dead fish all while laser beaming Ed Henry with condescension. It was quite a spectacle. Take a listen:
It appears Ms. Clinton's emails were not secure, and among the items that potentially got out to those with ill intentions against America was the activities and location of one Chris Stevens, our Ambassador who was murdered in Benghazi. Did Ms. Clinton's lackadaisical treatment of information presented her result in the death of our Ambassador and fellow service men who attempted to rescue him? Sure looks to be the case.
Ms. Clinton, as we have noted many times, is a progressive socialist who thinks America as founded is the problem, and as she learned well under her mentor Saul Alinksy, she would seek the reaching of her goals by any means necessary, legal or not.
In listening to the exchange with Henry, something caught my ear. I had recently read a very interesting piece by a guy I had previously never heard of, and found it extremely compelling. We posted some analysis of the piece on our Facebook page at BAHL Revere.
The piece was titled The Disturbing Line Hillary Clinton Quoted from Her Favorite Book—and Why It Matters. It asked the following question: Is the presidential hopeful living out a theme from Dostoevsky?
The author of the piece has really discovered something extraordinary. He noted a previous interview with Hillary Clinton where "five words leapt of the screen, where they almost verbatim mirrored a key phrase in Dostoesky's book The Brothers Karamazov."
The phrase was "Everything I did was legally permitted." This phrase also turned up in the exchange with Henry, which you can go back note 0:33 seconds in. She made it a point of emphasis.
In the article, brilliantly put together by Matthew Becklo, he noted the following correlation which comes in a passage described as being about the connection between morality and a belief in immorality:
…were mankind’s belief in its immortality to be destroyed, not only love but also any living power to continue the life of the world would at once dry up in it. Not only that, but then nothing would be immoral any longer, everything would be permitted, even anthropophagy. And even that is not all: he ended with the assertion that for every separate person, like ourselves for instance, who believes neither in God nor in his own immortality, the moral law of nature ought to change immediately into the exact opposite of the former religious law, and that egoism, even to the point of evildoing, should not only be permitted to man but should be acknowledged as the necessary, the most reasonable, and all but the noblest result of his situation. (Emphasis added by the author Matthew Becklo)
This certainly implies Ms. Clinton has no belief in immortality and therefore concludes everything would be permitted. That would explain why Ms. Clinton does not feel obligated to be constrained by the laws you and I must adhere to, or feel compelled to obey any of the laws of governance in America, inclusive of laws she participated in legislating.
Enter the email scandal, where she acted with any means necessary to accomplish her objectives and deemed her actions throughout were legally permitted. Got it, thanks to Becklo.
Our language is being rewritten by the progressives. Seemingly innocuous phrases have meaningful and dangerous connotations few if any actually comprehend. Matthew Becklo caught Hillary, and it indeed does matter, as everything is not permitted.
Keep your ears open!
Wednesday, April 15, 2015
A Champion of Distortion and Failure
On Sunday, the inevitable announcement came that Hillary Clinton will be running for president, seeking the Democratic nomination that slipped through her fingers in 2008 when a dashing community organizer with spiteful disdain for America appeared as the one the progressive left has been dreaming about stole it away.
Although this has the look of a coronation, even with the Clinton's setting the rules of engagement for the media and potential primary opponents, it is hard to imagine that no other Democrat wants this job.
Almost immediately, her campaign is full full of missteps and mistruths. For example, she went on a bus tour stopping along the way at a Chipolte (owned by huge Democrat supporters ) for a bite to eat, just like the common man does each day. Except, this is activity she simply does not engage in, having not paid for a meal in decades and reportedly not having driven a car since 1996. Hillary is far form a normal person, in fact loathing the little guy she purports to wake up every day to make life better for.
While she has logged many a mile, as prospective GOP candidate Carly Fiorina so appropriately pointed out, flying is an activity, not an accomplishment. Clinton operatives are out touting her record, recently evidenced by Howard Dean noting she is the only candidate with foreign policy experience.
New flash to Dean; the experience is far from anything to brag about. While she was Secretary of State, the situation in the middle wast has completely collapsed due to horrendous polices with the middle east left in ruin having become a major national security threat with Iran gaining legitimacy and strength.
Her reset with Russia have left us with Vladimir Putin invading countries and with our relationship with Russia at its lowest point since the conclusion of the cold war. At best, her lack of attention to detail in Benghazi resulted in our Ambassador being murdered, along with three other heroes with nobody held in account for the tragedy.
Clinton lied about the incident to the American people, and made no mention about the real reason for the firefight, which was illegal gun running. But hey, what difference does it really make?
Recently, she lied about email accounts during her tenure as Secretary of State, where she destroyed emails of her experiences, skirting federal law. While due to this matter she should be facing jail time, it becomes evident that Clinton does not have to live by the same rules, or laws, you and I, and most other elected officials, do.
On a side note, I get real torqued when politicians think they are above it all and destroy documents that belong to the people and sever the preservation of the historical record., where the Clinton clan has along history, inclusive of Sandy Burglar.
We have informed you of the danger of Hillary Clinton in previous posts, most notably in this piece. Hillary Clinton is a liar, far more interested in self promotion than the health and welfare of America, a country she has disdain for as evidenced by her close associations over the years with anti-American activists inclusive of Saul Alinsky and Frances Fox Piven.
Hillary Rodham Clinton wants to be your champion. I want individuals across the fruited plain to all be champions, forging their own path unencumbered by a controlling government. As Senator Rick Santorum recently said, "Clinton believes government is the solution to the challenges our nation faces, not the underlying cause of many of those problems".
She is an arrogant hypocrite, an intellectual progressive operative with disdain for the blue collar working families she professes to support, an individual who dreams of squelching free markets through taxation and regulation championing crony capitalism in support of self promotion and her political advocates all the while welcoming opportunities to abuse power.
In no way, shape or form is this an individual we should even remotely consider for our highest office. She is a champion of distortion and failure.
Although this has the look of a coronation, even with the Clinton's setting the rules of engagement for the media and potential primary opponents, it is hard to imagine that no other Democrat wants this job.
Almost immediately, her campaign is full full of missteps and mistruths. For example, she went on a bus tour stopping along the way at a Chipolte (owned by huge Democrat supporters ) for a bite to eat, just like the common man does each day. Except, this is activity she simply does not engage in, having not paid for a meal in decades and reportedly not having driven a car since 1996. Hillary is far form a normal person, in fact loathing the little guy she purports to wake up every day to make life better for.
 |
| Hillary Clinton in staged Iowa event. |
Today, she met with common folk for a chat, even though the "common folk" were driven to the location by campaign operatives. "Everyday" Iowans outside looking in had a rough day, but for those on the inside, it was sunshine and lollipops. For the Clintons, it is all a fabrication, and the joke is on us.
While she has logged many a mile, as prospective GOP candidate Carly Fiorina so appropriately pointed out, flying is an activity, not an accomplishment. Clinton operatives are out touting her record, recently evidenced by Howard Dean noting she is the only candidate with foreign policy experience.
New flash to Dean; the experience is far from anything to brag about. While she was Secretary of State, the situation in the middle wast has completely collapsed due to horrendous polices with the middle east left in ruin having become a major national security threat with Iran gaining legitimacy and strength.
Her reset with Russia have left us with Vladimir Putin invading countries and with our relationship with Russia at its lowest point since the conclusion of the cold war. At best, her lack of attention to detail in Benghazi resulted in our Ambassador being murdered, along with three other heroes with nobody held in account for the tragedy.
Clinton lied about the incident to the American people, and made no mention about the real reason for the firefight, which was illegal gun running. But hey, what difference does it really make?
Recently, she lied about email accounts during her tenure as Secretary of State, where she destroyed emails of her experiences, skirting federal law. While due to this matter she should be facing jail time, it becomes evident that Clinton does not have to live by the same rules, or laws, you and I, and most other elected officials, do.
On a side note, I get real torqued when politicians think they are above it all and destroy documents that belong to the people and sever the preservation of the historical record., where the Clinton clan has along history, inclusive of Sandy Burglar.
We have informed you of the danger of Hillary Clinton in previous posts, most notably in this piece. Hillary Clinton is a liar, far more interested in self promotion than the health and welfare of America, a country she has disdain for as evidenced by her close associations over the years with anti-American activists inclusive of Saul Alinsky and Frances Fox Piven.
Hillary Rodham Clinton wants to be your champion. I want individuals across the fruited plain to all be champions, forging their own path unencumbered by a controlling government. As Senator Rick Santorum recently said, "Clinton believes government is the solution to the challenges our nation faces, not the underlying cause of many of those problems".
She is an arrogant hypocrite, an intellectual progressive operative with disdain for the blue collar working families she professes to support, an individual who dreams of squelching free markets through taxation and regulation championing crony capitalism in support of self promotion and her political advocates all the while welcoming opportunities to abuse power.
In no way, shape or form is this an individual we should even remotely consider for our highest office. She is a champion of distortion and failure.
Monday, October 20, 2014
Under Control
Another presentation of excellence from Michael Ramirez of Investors.com.
64% of Americans think things in America are out of control. They are right.
However, things are under control for President Obama.
Obama did run guns, seemingly in hopes of an event which would sway the American public opinion with respect to the second amendment. Can you think of any logical reasoning to arm those engaging in conflict with our border patrol agents on the southern border?
Richard Nixon dreamed of targeting political enemies, and had articles of impeachment filed for attempting to use the IRS to do so. Obama did utilize the IRS to target, not only individual political opponents, but political groups and non profits political organizations across America. In the aftermath, the administration has dodged and deflected Congressional inquires all the way home. These are impeachable offenses.
Perhaps the most despicable actions of the Obama administration, completely inclusive of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, was the actions undertaken in Benghazi. As if sacrificing patriots charged in the defense of our nation is not deplorable enough, both President Obama and Sec. Clinton lied to the American people, and the families of the fallen, about their deaths, floating propaganda about a video causing all the disturbance leading to the death causing conflict. It was gun running.
Obamacare is nothing short of a governmental takeover of private industry. Democrat operatives have spoken aloud, even if ignored by the mainstream media, that the objective is to put private insurance companies out of business. And no, you cannot keep your doctor and no, your premiums are not decreasing. It was, and is, all a lie, right down to the death panels.
The border rush of all those youngsters on tricycles entering our nation through the southern border was not a 21st century rebirth of the gumball rally. No, it was a vehicle in the effort to transfer the wealth to those in nations the United States supposedly oppressed as we built our prosperity through free market enterprise and entrepreneur ship.
An opponent of our allies and a friend to our enemies, the release of five of the worst terrorists we held captive for a servicemen who by most accounting went AWOL is beyond criminal. Listening to Private Bergdahl's father speak in code to our opponents, an orchestrated slap in the face to America by Obama, was really hard to swallow. This is high treason. Of course, if you have been following along, Obama is not on the same team as Uncle Sam, and I, are on.
Those charged in protecting the President are repeatedly dropping the ball. Obama is a very bad guy, but we cannot have his security fail resulting in his injury or death. In this country, we remove tyrants through a the legal process. Keep in mind the enemies in foreign lands are really his friends, even Medvedev.
Ramirez ran out of room.
In addition, never in history has the government in this country so aggressively sought the observance of the citizenry as those under the command of Obama. From the usage of the IRS to Common Core, it is so out of control the battle between dystopian authors George Orwell and Aldous Huxley over who was right is in vogue. I'll go with Huxley, by the way.
You think Obama thinks he is losing grip by all the above items cited as out of control. Yet Obama is an anti-colonialist, an opponent of the west and free markets. Obama is working, very effectively, to give them the wealth, them being those who the United States supposedly oppressed to achieve our wealth.
None of the above referenced items would have gone the way they did if you were in charge. Think about it.
Obama is not lacking in intelligence, or arrogance, and he has got things in complete control, as least as far as he see it.
The transformation of The United States of America. Indeed, Obama has it under control.
 |
| Michael Ramirez/Investors Business Daily |
However, things are under control for President Obama.
Obama did run guns, seemingly in hopes of an event which would sway the American public opinion with respect to the second amendment. Can you think of any logical reasoning to arm those engaging in conflict with our border patrol agents on the southern border?
Richard Nixon dreamed of targeting political enemies, and had articles of impeachment filed for attempting to use the IRS to do so. Obama did utilize the IRS to target, not only individual political opponents, but political groups and non profits political organizations across America. In the aftermath, the administration has dodged and deflected Congressional inquires all the way home. These are impeachable offenses.
Perhaps the most despicable actions of the Obama administration, completely inclusive of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, was the actions undertaken in Benghazi. As if sacrificing patriots charged in the defense of our nation is not deplorable enough, both President Obama and Sec. Clinton lied to the American people, and the families of the fallen, about their deaths, floating propaganda about a video causing all the disturbance leading to the death causing conflict. It was gun running.
Obamacare is nothing short of a governmental takeover of private industry. Democrat operatives have spoken aloud, even if ignored by the mainstream media, that the objective is to put private insurance companies out of business. And no, you cannot keep your doctor and no, your premiums are not decreasing. It was, and is, all a lie, right down to the death panels.
The border rush of all those youngsters on tricycles entering our nation through the southern border was not a 21st century rebirth of the gumball rally. No, it was a vehicle in the effort to transfer the wealth to those in nations the United States supposedly oppressed as we built our prosperity through free market enterprise and entrepreneur ship.
An opponent of our allies and a friend to our enemies, the release of five of the worst terrorists we held captive for a servicemen who by most accounting went AWOL is beyond criminal. Listening to Private Bergdahl's father speak in code to our opponents, an orchestrated slap in the face to America by Obama, was really hard to swallow. This is high treason. Of course, if you have been following along, Obama is not on the same team as Uncle Sam, and I, are on.
Those charged in protecting the President are repeatedly dropping the ball. Obama is a very bad guy, but we cannot have his security fail resulting in his injury or death. In this country, we remove tyrants through a the legal process. Keep in mind the enemies in foreign lands are really his friends, even Medvedev.
Ramirez ran out of room.
In addition, never in history has the government in this country so aggressively sought the observance of the citizenry as those under the command of Obama. From the usage of the IRS to Common Core, it is so out of control the battle between dystopian authors George Orwell and Aldous Huxley over who was right is in vogue. I'll go with Huxley, by the way.
You think Obama thinks he is losing grip by all the above items cited as out of control. Yet Obama is an anti-colonialist, an opponent of the west and free markets. Obama is working, very effectively, to give them the wealth, them being those who the United States supposedly oppressed to achieve our wealth.
None of the above referenced items would have gone the way they did if you were in charge. Think about it.
Obama is not lacking in intelligence, or arrogance, and he has got things in complete control, as least as far as he see it.
The transformation of The United States of America. Indeed, Obama has it under control.
Thursday, June 26, 2014
No Doubt
No doubt.
That is my usual reaction each day after reading the brilliant editorial cartoons of Michael Ramirez of Investors Business Daily.
Are you reading IBD? You should be.
In IBD, beyond the magnificent coverage of the capital markets and their proprietary stock evaluation tools, you will read in the best editorial page going "what is really going on". In addition, you will find the exemplary work of Michael Ramirez.
This past week, Ramirez has been rockin, presenting profound and ingenious reflections on events of the week as only he can. Please take a look at these, along with our limited commentary.
The media, a national disgrace these days, no longer hides their bias toward the Obama administration and the progressive ideology. It would be laughable if the results of this bias were not having such a negative effect on our nation. The ever increasing legions of low information voters are easily persuaded, particularly after cleverly placed first impressions, by packaged propaganda. As Ronald Reagan once said, the trouble with our friends on the left is they know so much that isn't so. We can blame in large measure the criminally complicit news media for the lack of political knowledge of those citizens who have failed in their responsibility as citizens to stay adequately informed.
Certainly, the progressive Democrats are no fans of those who claim to be among the members of the Tea Party. After all, Tea Party members seek adherence to our Constitution, limited government, fiscal responsibility and power to the people in direct contrast to the big government elitists who aim to control citizen behavior for the common good as they know better. Sadly, a large portion of the GOP is in lockstep with the progressives, longing for the day when they can yield their power. Any doubt of this should have departed following the grotesque political events from Mississippi this week. The GOP will not attack the left, most notably President Obama, who are destroying our nation as founded, but due their thirst for power, will firebomb Conservatives with wreckless abandon. John Adams and the gang would be peeved to say the least.
Let's get ready for Hillary. The coronation of Hillary Clinton for the 2016 Democratic nomination for president is in full swing with her embarking on a book tour in various cities complete with meet and greets. The book has been a flop, and there have been several missteps by Ms. Clinton along the tour. The book is titled "Hard Choices", but as I see it, she has not made any. Ms. Clinton is presented as among the most accomplished women in history, but this is complete nonsense and a slap to the face of Babe Didrikson Zaharias. Clinton won a NY Senate seat, although she was not a resident of the state, and has little to no legislative marks to her credit. Her tenure as Secretary of State was horrendous, beginning with a "reset" debacle with Russia to the scandalous and despicable events of Benghazi. Due to the media love affair with this women, second only to that of another of limited accomplishment in Obama, many in America have a high approval rating of Hillary. In truth, she is a Saul Alinsky disciple, and admirer of Frances Fox Piven and Margaret Sanger, and someone who like Obama does not see America in the way that you do. In fact, she is an empty pantsuit with very little accomplishment having made no hard choices. Ask Christopher Stevens.
Investors Business Daily may be accessed online at Investors.com. Check it out today!
Wednesday, June 18, 2014
High Treason
I should have seen something like this coming. After all , it was a beautiful Saturday here in The City Beautiful, lovely downtown Orlando.
In the aftermath of what was labeled a prisoner exchange, there was President Obama in the Rose Garden with the parents of Bowe Bergdahl, who had reportedly been held captive for approximately five years by the Taliban. After a series of flashbulbs for the optic, the real details of what had actually took place began to emerge.
Bowe's father, Bob Bergdahl, was gleefully given time at the podium by President Obama and proceeded to speak the Taliban language, with many thinking he was in code claiming the White House for Allah. Whatever it was, I found it offensive.
During the exchange, which was odd in many ways, Bowe Bergdahl seemed very comfortable with his captors. This would seemingly make sense, since his US commanders, and fellow servicemen, are of the opinion he walked away from his platoon willingly. Anti-American and military comments that had been posted by Bowe became public knowledge, and it became clear he likely was a deserter.
Meanwhile, Bob Bergdahl, during the captivity of his son, had become quite cosy with the Afghan people, utilizing his Twitter account with frequency. In days prior to the swap, Bob tweeted he would continue to fight for the Afgahns and will work hard to close Guantanamo Bay.
In contrast, I fully support the continued captivity at Guantanamo Bay of those who wish harm on America. Obama, not so much.
To secure the "release" of Private Bergdahl, President Obama granted the freedom of five top level Taliban leaders. You read that correctly, five of the top Taliban leaders.
Shock and outrage! These are some of the adjectives describing the feelings of much of our citizenry over the release of five high level terrorists for what appears to be a deserter of our military.
Many wondered why our administration would agree to do this?
Let me be clear. President Obama is, at a minimum, sympathetic to the Muslim Brotherhood and Islamic interests. Sadly, within our government, he is not alone. Keep in mind that the parents of Huma Abedin, chief of staff for Hillary Clinton, are high level members of the Muslim Brotherhood.
As Dinesh D'Souza had appropriately pointed out with sufficient empirical evidence, Obama views America as a bully, and oppressor on the world stage, and is seeking in his transformation to lower the presence of Uncle Sam, empowering those he views as oppressed providing assistance through angles he is comfortable in getting away with.
Actions speak louder than words. We know Obama has been delivering weapons to the Taliban, which was the center of what happened in Benghazi, and now, we have what could be considered an act of treason by releasing known enemy combatants, whose motivation is to kill our servicemen, out into the arena of war once again.
I can only pray the injured soldiers, and the families of our veterans lost fighting the Taliban can take some comfort during this time, and know that many Americans stand with them, shoulder blade to shoulder blade. God Bless you all!
I do not know how you define aiding and abetting the enemy, but I find this action exactly that. In addition, the official position of the United States is not to negotiate with known terrorists, which has obviously taken place. Except, Obama does not view the Taliban as terrorists; rather freedom fighters. Those freedom fighters are fighting against, you guessed it, us.
On a multitude of fronts, President Obama is failing as President, running an arrogant and lawless administration with destructive results. But these actions, assisting known terrorist and enemies of the United States of America, should put his impeachment on the fast track.
In the words of liberal professor Jonathan Turley, Obama's "become the very danger the Constitution was designed to avoid".
Judge Jeanine Pirro, sharing our disgust in this matter, makes a compelling case for impeachment.
In the aftermath of what was labeled a prisoner exchange, there was President Obama in the Rose Garden with the parents of Bowe Bergdahl, who had reportedly been held captive for approximately five years by the Taliban. After a series of flashbulbs for the optic, the real details of what had actually took place began to emerge.
Bowe's father, Bob Bergdahl, was gleefully given time at the podium by President Obama and proceeded to speak the Taliban language, with many thinking he was in code claiming the White House for Allah. Whatever it was, I found it offensive.
During the exchange, which was odd in many ways, Bowe Bergdahl seemed very comfortable with his captors. This would seemingly make sense, since his US commanders, and fellow servicemen, are of the opinion he walked away from his platoon willingly. Anti-American and military comments that had been posted by Bowe became public knowledge, and it became clear he likely was a deserter.
Meanwhile, Bob Bergdahl, during the captivity of his son, had become quite cosy with the Afghan people, utilizing his Twitter account with frequency. In days prior to the swap, Bob tweeted he would continue to fight for the Afgahns and will work hard to close Guantanamo Bay.
In contrast, I fully support the continued captivity at Guantanamo Bay of those who wish harm on America. Obama, not so much.
To secure the "release" of Private Bergdahl, President Obama granted the freedom of five top level Taliban leaders. You read that correctly, five of the top Taliban leaders.
 |
| The Taliban 5 (click to enlarge) |
Let me be clear. President Obama is, at a minimum, sympathetic to the Muslim Brotherhood and Islamic interests. Sadly, within our government, he is not alone. Keep in mind that the parents of Huma Abedin, chief of staff for Hillary Clinton, are high level members of the Muslim Brotherhood.
As Dinesh D'Souza had appropriately pointed out with sufficient empirical evidence, Obama views America as a bully, and oppressor on the world stage, and is seeking in his transformation to lower the presence of Uncle Sam, empowering those he views as oppressed providing assistance through angles he is comfortable in getting away with.
Actions speak louder than words. We know Obama has been delivering weapons to the Taliban, which was the center of what happened in Benghazi, and now, we have what could be considered an act of treason by releasing known enemy combatants, whose motivation is to kill our servicemen, out into the arena of war once again.
I can only pray the injured soldiers, and the families of our veterans lost fighting the Taliban can take some comfort during this time, and know that many Americans stand with them, shoulder blade to shoulder blade. God Bless you all!
I do not know how you define aiding and abetting the enemy, but I find this action exactly that. In addition, the official position of the United States is not to negotiate with known terrorists, which has obviously taken place. Except, Obama does not view the Taliban as terrorists; rather freedom fighters. Those freedom fighters are fighting against, you guessed it, us.
On a multitude of fronts, President Obama is failing as President, running an arrogant and lawless administration with destructive results. But these actions, assisting known terrorist and enemies of the United States of America, should put his impeachment on the fast track.
In the words of liberal professor Jonathan Turley, Obama's "become the very danger the Constitution was designed to avoid".
Judge Jeanine Pirro, sharing our disgust in this matter, makes a compelling case for impeachment.
Wednesday, April 9, 2014
See The Sign
Here's your sign.
Comedian Bill Engvall tells the story of approaching the airline luggage counter to inform the staff that his luggage is lost. The airline staff member asked Engvall if his plane had landed. "No, I am having an out of body experience" relied Engvall. "Here's your sign".
One would think Americans, no matter the side of the political aisle they tend to gather, would demand answers when four patriots, including a US Ambassador, were murdered in a terrorist attack.
They do.
However, a percentage of Americans exist that only want answers to these type of questions if the representative for the other party is in charge. Here's your sign. That is very sad commentary, and is an example of folks who are limited in principles and character.
While most would be appalled to learn of this behavior, it is particularly distressing to learn that media members are actively engaged in a coverup of the aforementioned events in Benghazi. Not only is news regarding Benghazi being selectively presented on the mainstream networks, but editorial columnists are cheerleading the lack of transparency and suppression of the facts by the Obama administration and the complicit news media.
Enter Dana Milbank, and a recent editorial from the left in Investors Business Daily. Here's you sign.
I must have missed all the legitimate inquiries over Benghazi having been adequately answered, because according to Milbank, all efforts by House Republicans to get answers are a complete waste of time.
I obviously missed a change in what I considered to be the elusive transparency President Obama claimed his administration would have. I guess all those documents have been turned over to the investigating committee, and everyone performed admirably.
Well, I did not miss a damn thing.
Milbank hopes his ridiculing editorials, combined with media outlets biased coverage of what little information the investigating committee has gathered versus the stonewalling, misleading evidence and lack of transparency, will steer the public away from demanding answers.
Odds may favor Milbank and his teammates, but here is your sign.
What kind of people do not want answers when four Americans are killed? What type of individuals would seek to suppress information in an effort to protect officials just because they are members of their team?
When it comes to dereliction of duty, or the covering up of gun running, I could care less what political party the officials in charge are from. In America, we have laws and principles we live by, and those who violate the public trust in this regard must be held accountable.
Not in the minds of the progressives currently in charge. They are running the Alinksy model on all cylinders. Ridicule your opponents, fire out misinformation, lie so often the truth becomes murky and win the day by any means necessary.
Sign, sign, everywhere a sign. Here is another sign. No out of body experience needed.
Comedian Bill Engvall tells the story of approaching the airline luggage counter to inform the staff that his luggage is lost. The airline staff member asked Engvall if his plane had landed. "No, I am having an out of body experience" relied Engvall. "Here's your sign".
One would think Americans, no matter the side of the political aisle they tend to gather, would demand answers when four patriots, including a US Ambassador, were murdered in a terrorist attack.
They do.
However, a percentage of Americans exist that only want answers to these type of questions if the representative for the other party is in charge. Here's your sign. That is very sad commentary, and is an example of folks who are limited in principles and character.
While most would be appalled to learn of this behavior, it is particularly distressing to learn that media members are actively engaged in a coverup of the aforementioned events in Benghazi. Not only is news regarding Benghazi being selectively presented on the mainstream networks, but editorial columnists are cheerleading the lack of transparency and suppression of the facts by the Obama administration and the complicit news media.
Enter Dana Milbank, and a recent editorial from the left in Investors Business Daily. Here's you sign.
I must have missed all the legitimate inquiries over Benghazi having been adequately answered, because according to Milbank, all efforts by House Republicans to get answers are a complete waste of time.
I obviously missed a change in what I considered to be the elusive transparency President Obama claimed his administration would have. I guess all those documents have been turned over to the investigating committee, and everyone performed admirably.
Well, I did not miss a damn thing.
Milbank hopes his ridiculing editorials, combined with media outlets biased coverage of what little information the investigating committee has gathered versus the stonewalling, misleading evidence and lack of transparency, will steer the public away from demanding answers.
Odds may favor Milbank and his teammates, but here is your sign.
What kind of people do not want answers when four Americans are killed? What type of individuals would seek to suppress information in an effort to protect officials just because they are members of their team?
 |
| Here is a sign |
Not in the minds of the progressives currently in charge. They are running the Alinksy model on all cylinders. Ridicule your opponents, fire out misinformation, lie so often the truth becomes murky and win the day by any means necessary.
Sign, sign, everywhere a sign. Here is another sign. No out of body experience needed.
Monday, February 10, 2014
Ship of Fools Taking Water
Seemingly on a daily basis, I find that common sense has found itself aboard a sinking ship of fools who are drowning in a sea of irrelevance.
Bombarded by nonsense from the our government and their criminally complicit partners in the media, those relegated to the outer party are left so dizzy from tales of misrepresentation they don't know if they are inside outside or upside down.
Just this week, the mind boggling propaganda embarked upon in an effort to mask truly horrible employment numbers were worthy of rave reviews, if you are a numskull. Anybody with ten minutes of economic theory recognizes the dismal place our economy, by orchestration, is in.
Then comes the absurd. Except, this is real.
ABC reporter Jonathan Karl, who among this horrendous group of propagandists has a fair reputation, reports today that General David Petraeus, thought to be a moderate republican, has all but endorsed Hillary Clinton for president.
Given that it was Hillary Clinton and her MoveOn.org arm who labeled Gen. Petraeus "General Betray US" back during the Iraq war, this cannot be possible in the real world. I know politics make strange bedfellows, but that attack was, beyond completely false, a real personal low blow, even for the Clintons.
Yes, I almost have to suspend belief on this one.
However, as Karl reports; Petraeus has always shied away from politics, but in a new book he is quoted lavishing so much praise on Hillary Clinton, he seems to be endorsing her as a candidate for President.
“She’d make a tremendous president,” Petraeus says in the new book “HRC” by Jonathan Allen and Aimee Parnes.
And for Petraeus, Exhibit A in why she would be a tremendous president is the very thing for which Republicans most aggressively attack Clinton: her performance as Secretary of State when the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, was attacked.
“Like a lot of great leaders, her most impressive qualities were most visible during tough times,” Petraeus tells Allen and Parnes. “In the wake of the Benghazi attacks, for example, she was extraordinarily resolute, determined, and controlled.”
Gadzooks! Did I read that last paragraph correctly? We may want to revisit the ABC story just to be sure, in the event we were still feeling some residual from our last visit to the local watering hole.
Oh boy. Has he lost his mind? Perhaps Petraeus has taken up residence in The Crackerbox Palace.
We know Petraeus was doing the horizontal bop with a sporting young chick which forced him to resign his position, but what on earth do these people have on him? Somebody go find find Sandy Berger and look through his pants for those papers he stole from the national achieves for a clue.
Few have received such high praise for doing much of nothing than Hillary Clinton. Obama immediately comes to mind; however, sadly, he was elected president. Twice.
Although we could speak all afternoon about the scant leadership of Ms. Clinton, nothing comes close to not only the failure of leadership which resulted in the deaths of four American patriots in Benghazi, but her cold and callous reaction to the event, complete with lying to the families of the victims and the American people, which should eliminate her from holding higher office moving forward.
Please recall, while addressing the families and the nation as the bodies our of slain patriots returned to Andrews AFB, both President Obama and then Secretary of State Clinton lied to all by falsely blaming the Benghazi events on some stupid video nobody saw. Truly despicable behavior.
Petraeus certainly knows this, so there is little doubt the squeeze has been put on him. The fact that these people command this type of power, placing limits of freedom of speech through intimidation, is a threat to our republic.
Liars and bullies who represent our country in elected office who have such limited respect for those they were elected to govern should be removed from office, and certainly should not be considered as a candidate for our highest office.
Obviously, Obama and Clinton and the power brokers who represent them apparently own General Petraeus. The groundwork is being laid for the 2016 election, which may be the last opportunity to thwart the progressive movement.
Stand in the truth, and make sure you are not for sale, for those who are short in adherence to our founding principles are not only not worthy of your allegiance, but should be considered opponents.
Bombarded by nonsense from the our government and their criminally complicit partners in the media, those relegated to the outer party are left so dizzy from tales of misrepresentation they don't know if they are inside outside or upside down.
Just this week, the mind boggling propaganda embarked upon in an effort to mask truly horrible employment numbers were worthy of rave reviews, if you are a numskull. Anybody with ten minutes of economic theory recognizes the dismal place our economy, by orchestration, is in.
Then comes the absurd. Except, this is real.
ABC reporter Jonathan Karl, who among this horrendous group of propagandists has a fair reputation, reports today that General David Petraeus, thought to be a moderate republican, has all but endorsed Hillary Clinton for president.
Given that it was Hillary Clinton and her MoveOn.org arm who labeled Gen. Petraeus "General Betray US" back during the Iraq war, this cannot be possible in the real world. I know politics make strange bedfellows, but that attack was, beyond completely false, a real personal low blow, even for the Clintons.
Yes, I almost have to suspend belief on this one.
 |
| Gen. Petraeus and Hillary Clinton |
“She’d make a tremendous president,” Petraeus says in the new book “HRC” by Jonathan Allen and Aimee Parnes.
And for Petraeus, Exhibit A in why she would be a tremendous president is the very thing for which Republicans most aggressively attack Clinton: her performance as Secretary of State when the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, was attacked.
“Like a lot of great leaders, her most impressive qualities were most visible during tough times,” Petraeus tells Allen and Parnes. “In the wake of the Benghazi attacks, for example, she was extraordinarily resolute, determined, and controlled.”
Gadzooks! Did I read that last paragraph correctly? We may want to revisit the ABC story just to be sure, in the event we were still feeling some residual from our last visit to the local watering hole.
Oh boy. Has he lost his mind? Perhaps Petraeus has taken up residence in The Crackerbox Palace.
We know Petraeus was doing the horizontal bop with a sporting young chick which forced him to resign his position, but what on earth do these people have on him? Somebody go find find Sandy Berger and look through his pants for those papers he stole from the national achieves for a clue.
Few have received such high praise for doing much of nothing than Hillary Clinton. Obama immediately comes to mind; however, sadly, he was elected president. Twice.
Although we could speak all afternoon about the scant leadership of Ms. Clinton, nothing comes close to not only the failure of leadership which resulted in the deaths of four American patriots in Benghazi, but her cold and callous reaction to the event, complete with lying to the families of the victims and the American people, which should eliminate her from holding higher office moving forward.
Please recall, while addressing the families and the nation as the bodies our of slain patriots returned to Andrews AFB, both President Obama and then Secretary of State Clinton lied to all by falsely blaming the Benghazi events on some stupid video nobody saw. Truly despicable behavior.
Petraeus certainly knows this, so there is little doubt the squeeze has been put on him. The fact that these people command this type of power, placing limits of freedom of speech through intimidation, is a threat to our republic.
Liars and bullies who represent our country in elected office who have such limited respect for those they were elected to govern should be removed from office, and certainly should not be considered as a candidate for our highest office.
Obviously, Obama and Clinton and the power brokers who represent them apparently own General Petraeus. The groundwork is being laid for the 2016 election, which may be the last opportunity to thwart the progressive movement.
Stand in the truth, and make sure you are not for sale, for those who are short in adherence to our founding principles are not only not worthy of your allegiance, but should be considered opponents.
Wednesday, January 15, 2014
Time To Change Lanes
Recently, a blog post titled Breaking The Boardwalk, was presented detailing how early hopes have most certainly been lost when it comes to Chris Christie, the boisterous governor of New Jersey.
While early on Christie had exhibited such promise, it has become increasingly clear that Christie, while certainly preferable to Hillary Clinton in a 2016 presidential campaign, is not someone who should be placed in the position to represent the republican party in 2016; or at least the republican party once commanded by Ronaldus Magnus.
Christie has found himself at the center point of a ever increasing scandal involving members of staff closing several lanes of the George Washington bridge, a very heavily traveled bridge connecting New Jersey with Manhattan. The drive by media cannot get enough of the story, as they see it damaging to who they view as the main challenger to a Hillary Clinton nomination in 2016.
Gov. Christie has denied any knowledge of the actions of his staff members, noting he was heartbroken and "disturbed by the tone and behavior and attitude" from those long time associates within his staff. It is exactly that culture, which no doubt houses Christie himself, that is troubling.
At least Christie, in a news conference, accepted responsibility for the debacle, asked forgiveness from the citizenry and sought to be received by the mayor Fort Lee, a Christie critic, to apologize, which he was in what was described as a cordial meeting. Fort Lee, by the way, is not some relay station along the Hudson, but rather a major business area, home in fact to the operations of CNBC.
Christie had previously said the bridge lane closures were part of a traffic study. So, if we got this straight, because the government needs information, easily gathered through a handful of means, lane closures causing untold discomfort, losses in time and wages, and potentially interfering with law enforcement and ambulance activities was deemed necessary.
Rather than noting the lane closures as part of this potential study, had I been the Governor of New Jersey, it would seem obvious the pain inflicted upon the citizenry far exceeds the benefit of having to acquire this information in that particular fashion. Is not everyone on board with that?
The tentacles of this story are plentiful, but most of them will not grace the front pages of the nations leading newspapers or the mainstream media news organizations.
Democrats. No, democrats and an alarming amount of republicans. No. While progressives are using this opportunity to blast Christie's potential clash with Clinton, calling his actions reprehensible, the have a blind eye to the actions President Obama, which make the bridge lanes closures look like failing to come to a complete stop at a stop sign.
Obama administration scandals such as Fast and Furious, Benghazi, the IRS targeting of conservative groups, the manipulation of economic data, NSA data collection programs and politicizing the Department of Justice are considered completely within the realm sensible political action by his progressive supporters on both sides. Have any of the above scandalous incidents been adequately investigated with any conclusions drawn? Why? Obama has said he will get to the bottom of each of these issues save the economic data, but has gave us nothing but lies, now at least verified regarding Benghazi.
What Bridgegate and the above referenced Obama administration scandals have in common is the abuse of power. As Rush Limbaugh pointed out, "whether Governor Christie or President Obama were personally aware of the abuses perpetrated on their behalves is irrelevant. On some level, they set a tone in their administrations that signaled that such hardball would be tolerated," that a culture had been established of get your enemies."
Members of Christie's staff did just that with the lane closures, drawing appropriate scorn. But, where is the public scorn for President Obama, who told his political operatives not to bring a knife to a gun fight. In addition, Obama he told supporters to "punish our enemies". His top advisor Valerie Jarrett, was clearer in commentary; “After we win this election, it’s our turn. Payback time,” warned Valerie Jarrett, Mr. Obama’s longtime senior adviser. “Everyone not with us is against us, and they better be ready because we don’t forget. The ones who helped us will be rewarded, the ones who opposed us will get what they deserve. There is going to be hell to pay.”
One should keep in mind, by the way, that those "against them" are American citizens her boss was elected to serve.
While the actions associated with Bridegate fail miserably to challenge those of the Obama administration, one thing is crystal clear; progressives who view government as the answer to all the problems have no problem utilizing governmental levers upon the citizenry, no matter the encroachment on liberty and freedom, as you are insignificant to their reign of power.
This is called tyranny, as appropriately pointed out in a recent column by Dr. Milton Wolf in the Washington Post.
Glenn Beck further examines the similarities between Christie and Obama, which may come as quite a stunner to many. Take a listen:
With no lane closures impacting travel plans, the media continues to travel down all the wrong avenues. Focused on 2016, they intentionally hide the real story you should be considering in an effort to keep you from being able to adequately consider what is taking place.
Many look the other way if is one of "their" team members, apparently losing proper perspective. Certainly, a 2016 Christie administration would be much more preferable than a 2016 Clinton administration in my estimation for thousands of reasons. But, Bridgegate shows Christie is a big government politician, who thinks government, rather than the people, are in charge, and I do not have issue calling him out just because he, like me, is a republican.
Those who aim to keep the power away from the people think these actions are reasonable political operations. They are members of the ruling class, who seek to tinker with the Constitution tranferring power from the poeple to political opeartives who deem they are more qualifed and educated to make decisions for the citizenry. Those of us who embrace the founding fathers, the rule of law and the power of the people, should recognize that these are not individuals who should be given the opportunity to serve the public.
This applies to the 2014 mid terms, not just the presidential election 2016. Does anybody care?
While early on Christie had exhibited such promise, it has become increasingly clear that Christie, while certainly preferable to Hillary Clinton in a 2016 presidential campaign, is not someone who should be placed in the position to represent the republican party in 2016; or at least the republican party once commanded by Ronaldus Magnus.
Christie has found himself at the center point of a ever increasing scandal involving members of staff closing several lanes of the George Washington bridge, a very heavily traveled bridge connecting New Jersey with Manhattan. The drive by media cannot get enough of the story, as they see it damaging to who they view as the main challenger to a Hillary Clinton nomination in 2016.
Gov. Christie has denied any knowledge of the actions of his staff members, noting he was heartbroken and "disturbed by the tone and behavior and attitude" from those long time associates within his staff. It is exactly that culture, which no doubt houses Christie himself, that is troubling.
At least Christie, in a news conference, accepted responsibility for the debacle, asked forgiveness from the citizenry and sought to be received by the mayor Fort Lee, a Christie critic, to apologize, which he was in what was described as a cordial meeting. Fort Lee, by the way, is not some relay station along the Hudson, but rather a major business area, home in fact to the operations of CNBC.
Christie had previously said the bridge lane closures were part of a traffic study. So, if we got this straight, because the government needs information, easily gathered through a handful of means, lane closures causing untold discomfort, losses in time and wages, and potentially interfering with law enforcement and ambulance activities was deemed necessary.
Rather than noting the lane closures as part of this potential study, had I been the Governor of New Jersey, it would seem obvious the pain inflicted upon the citizenry far exceeds the benefit of having to acquire this information in that particular fashion. Is not everyone on board with that?
The tentacles of this story are plentiful, but most of them will not grace the front pages of the nations leading newspapers or the mainstream media news organizations.
Obama administration scandals such as Fast and Furious, Benghazi, the IRS targeting of conservative groups, the manipulation of economic data, NSA data collection programs and politicizing the Department of Justice are considered completely within the realm sensible political action by his progressive supporters on both sides. Have any of the above scandalous incidents been adequately investigated with any conclusions drawn? Why? Obama has said he will get to the bottom of each of these issues save the economic data, but has gave us nothing but lies, now at least verified regarding Benghazi.
What Bridgegate and the above referenced Obama administration scandals have in common is the abuse of power. As Rush Limbaugh pointed out, "whether Governor Christie or President Obama were personally aware of the abuses perpetrated on their behalves is irrelevant. On some level, they set a tone in their administrations that signaled that such hardball would be tolerated," that a culture had been established of get your enemies."
Members of Christie's staff did just that with the lane closures, drawing appropriate scorn. But, where is the public scorn for President Obama, who told his political operatives not to bring a knife to a gun fight. In addition, Obama he told supporters to "punish our enemies". His top advisor Valerie Jarrett, was clearer in commentary; “After we win this election, it’s our turn. Payback time,” warned Valerie Jarrett, Mr. Obama’s longtime senior adviser. “Everyone not with us is against us, and they better be ready because we don’t forget. The ones who helped us will be rewarded, the ones who opposed us will get what they deserve. There is going to be hell to pay.”
One should keep in mind, by the way, that those "against them" are American citizens her boss was elected to serve.
While the actions associated with Bridegate fail miserably to challenge those of the Obama administration, one thing is crystal clear; progressives who view government as the answer to all the problems have no problem utilizing governmental levers upon the citizenry, no matter the encroachment on liberty and freedom, as you are insignificant to their reign of power.
This is called tyranny, as appropriately pointed out in a recent column by Dr. Milton Wolf in the Washington Post.
Glenn Beck further examines the similarities between Christie and Obama, which may come as quite a stunner to many. Take a listen:
With no lane closures impacting travel plans, the media continues to travel down all the wrong avenues. Focused on 2016, they intentionally hide the real story you should be considering in an effort to keep you from being able to adequately consider what is taking place.
Many look the other way if is one of "their" team members, apparently losing proper perspective. Certainly, a 2016 Christie administration would be much more preferable than a 2016 Clinton administration in my estimation for thousands of reasons. But, Bridgegate shows Christie is a big government politician, who thinks government, rather than the people, are in charge, and I do not have issue calling him out just because he, like me, is a republican.
Those who aim to keep the power away from the people think these actions are reasonable political operations. They are members of the ruling class, who seek to tinker with the Constitution tranferring power from the poeple to political opeartives who deem they are more qualifed and educated to make decisions for the citizenry. Those of us who embrace the founding fathers, the rule of law and the power of the people, should recognize that these are not individuals who should be given the opportunity to serve the public.
This applies to the 2014 mid terms, not just the presidential election 2016. Does anybody care?
Tuesday, November 19, 2013
Tentacles of Deceit
For anyone that knows SAT is a Scholastic Aptitude Test, it is clear the Obama administration, which has been based upon deception and diversion, has been lying to the American people with stunning arrogance on a myriad of subjects.
This week, the nation continues to reel from the deception surrounding Obamacare. Late last night in a breaking story, we learned that just prior to the 2012 election, the unemployment numbers were manipulated, or to be blunt, falsified.
Perhaps the biggest lie was involving the events which took the loves of four American Patriots in Benghazi. Many have forgotten, as the administration worked diligently to keep the facts hidden. Thankfully, there are many who continue to seek answers and aim to hold the administration accountable.
Michael Ramirez of Investors Business Daily has not forgotten, nor have we.
Maintsream media outlets are reporting that recent issues have cast a cloud on the credibility of our president. Submitted for your review in a previous blogpost, liars lack credibility, and sadly, President Obama lost that with us almost from the get go, if he ever had any.
America is in peril. An increasingly trivial culture preoccupied with political correctness and passivity, we have allowed individuals without principles, who lack a moral compass and a respect for the rule of law, to attain positions of governance over our citizenry.
This most troubling development will lead to a dark future of oppression if not thwarted in short order. For the sake of future generations, we all must do our part to reclaim America from those who seek to alter the visions of our Founders and the faith based principles that guided them all.
This week, the nation continues to reel from the deception surrounding Obamacare. Late last night in a breaking story, we learned that just prior to the 2012 election, the unemployment numbers were manipulated, or to be blunt, falsified.
Perhaps the biggest lie was involving the events which took the loves of four American Patriots in Benghazi. Many have forgotten, as the administration worked diligently to keep the facts hidden. Thankfully, there are many who continue to seek answers and aim to hold the administration accountable.
Michael Ramirez of Investors Business Daily has not forgotten, nor have we.
 |
| Micheal Ramirez/Investors Business Daily |
America is in peril. An increasingly trivial culture preoccupied with political correctness and passivity, we have allowed individuals without principles, who lack a moral compass and a respect for the rule of law, to attain positions of governance over our citizenry.
This most troubling development will lead to a dark future of oppression if not thwarted in short order. For the sake of future generations, we all must do our part to reclaim America from those who seek to alter the visions of our Founders and the faith based principles that guided them all.
Tuesday, November 12, 2013
Dealbreaker
 |
| Michael Ramirez/Investors Business Daily |
It boggles the mind to think under what mindset Obama was able to convince a majority of the voting public to support him in his effort for re-election, but there is little doubt Obama would have been unsuccessful if the voters knew now what they should have known then.
Shame on them for not taking the responsibility as a citizen to adequately assess the candidates. But for the sitting President to act in such deception of governance, and this is going on in many levels from Bengahzi to sanction negotiations with Iran, the assessment of being a liar transitions to potential articles of impeachment, for which we have previously called for.
No quarter will be provided for the Obamacare Dozen, a group of Democrats seeking delay of the individual mandate because their re-election is now looking shaky. Each and every single one of these morons, and I'll add Sen. Diane Feinstein (D:CA) to the list, supported Obamacare and welcomed the opportunity for federal government bureaucrats to make health care decisions for you in your stead because of your ignorance on governing yourself.
The same goes for Hillary Clinton. Today, Bill Clinton weighed in on the situation suggesting Obama make some adjustments, but this is simply cover for Hillary 2016, as both of the Clinton's firmly supported Obamacare.
It should be understood thoroughly that any efforts from Democrats at this juncture to fix or delay the law is only presented to enhance their political position for the next election and does not come from a position change on the law.
It is worth noting that those who created the problem are rarely those who should be charged with fixing the problem.
An editorial in Investors Business Daily notes All These Lies And Incompetence, Too, but the truth is this entire affair was all by design, including orchestration of the failed roll out. These people are not operating nincompoops; they wish for there to be chaos causing a worried public to seek help from an all to willing government to further increase power and control over the citizenry.
With respect to Obamacare, it is the single payer system that is the goal, and with a distraught and frightened public, it will sadly arrive much sooner than originally thought. The only hope is for the Congress to reassert their power and put the Commander in Overreach back in his proper place.
Sadly, with a untrustworthy candidate spewing lies left and right, the voters failed to accomplish that.
Wednesday, October 30, 2013
Political Culprits Lining Up In Circles
According to the the Progressives, the elite ruling class, adoring Obamabots and idiots at large among the most fervent admirers of our Commander in Teleprompter, we are informed that President Obama is a man of unprecedented vision, among the most intellectually astute and charmed individual ever to aspire to public service.
So much so, in fact, as reported by John Fund in The Corner, the admiration of the all knowing Obama his chief advisor Valerie Jarrett knows no bounds. “I think Barack knew that he had God-given talents that were extraordinary. He knows exactly how smart he is. . . . He knows how perceptive he is. He knows what a good reader of people he is. And he knows that he has the ability — the extraordinary, uncanny ability — to take a thousand different perspectives, digest them and make sense out of them, and I think that he has never really been challenged intellectually. . . . So what I sensed in him was not just a restless spirit but somebody with such extraordinary talents that had to be really taxed in order for him to be happy. . . . He’s been bored to death his whole life. He’s just too talented to do what ordinary people do.”
 |
| Michael Ramirez/Investors Business Daily
Since Uncle Sam was so fortunate to have this extraordinary charlatan as our President, we the constituents recognize his keen insight into pop culture events, sporting event prognostication and divisive behavior among law abiding citizens.
However, with untold scandals entangling his administration, ones which have cost the lives of those charged to serve and protect this country, violated countless economic, contract and constitutional laws and nationalized private commerce across the fruited plain, we are told Obama was not integrally involved.
No, Obama cannot be held accountable, for he was not involved. Back during attack on our country via the murder of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Patriots in Benghazi, Obama was playing cards. It was the eighth re-run of Sportscenter on ESPN when the NSA spying program was given the OK. Obama was busy on sustainable community research when the Obamacare website was given a trial run. In his brilliance, Obama was tapped in via electronic surveillance on Tea Party groups when untold illegal aliens were released to collect entitlement benefits while plotting their next blue collar crime.
It is simply beyond ridiculous.
Obama is eager to take credit for any measurable success which is championed by not only his supporters, but a criminally complicit media. However, when things go wrong, without question the President was otherwise occupied and cannot and will not be held responsible.
Those who are deemed responsible are lining up in circles, and the citizenry is getting whip sawed.
It is in fact the Limbaugh theorem; Obama cannot be held accountable for destruction he is perceived to not have been part of the implementation or orchestration thereof. Certainly, the public did not feel the need to hold him accountable as he defeated Mitt Romney in 2012.
But, the Obamacare debacle may be too much for even this smooth talking impostor President to overcome. After all, certainly he would be responsible for something proudly bearing his name.
Or will he? Trick or Treat.
|
Wednesday, October 2, 2013
Comfortably Progressive Ruling Class
Back in 2009, at a Tea Party rally in beautiful downtown Orlando featuring Rep. Steve King, R:IA, and radio talk show host Mike Gallagher, standing in the background
off my right shoulder I noticed a familiar face; John Boehner, R:OH.Boehner was not advertised as a featured speaker, and it appeared by his demeanor he was sort of scoping out the situation. Indeed, as you may suspect, Boehner was identified and was asked to speak ao the crowd delivering what one would consider a decent speech noting all the customary rhetoric concerning the encroachment of freedom being engaged upon by our newly elected President.
But, it did not appear Boehner was comfortable.
In fact, Speaker Boehner has never been comfortable with the Tea Party faction of the GOP. Items and issues have continued to mount since that evening in Orlando, and on this day we can most certainly conclude that Boehner is a progressive republican who is more comfortable with the big government ruling class than those who champion free markets and the Constitution.
Two recent issues are worth noting. First, Speaker Boehner has failed to step up with leadership in the investigation surrounding the most troubling events in Benghazi, at a minimum standing in the background reminiscent of the aforementioned Orlando evening.
Emerging today is an alarming series of emails between the chiefs of staffs of Speaker Boehner and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, whom we find a disgusting individual, working together to have the President to carve them out of the requirement of Obamacare behind the public eye while employing public rhetoric to the contrary.
The Democrats, and perhaps the progressive republicans, may welcome this type of chicanery within their ranks, but those of us in Tea Party, and I would hope most Americans, find it offensive.
But do Republicans and Democrats actually exist anymore? Some say no, and they are likely correct.
Glenn Beck recently interviewed Mark Leibovich of The New York Times, author of the new book "This Town" discussing this theory in some detail. Please take a listen:
It sure seems a three party system is where we are at; the far left communists, the interior progressive ruling class and the Tea Party Constitutionalists. Those in the middle are the careerists Leibovich refers to; folks like the Clintons, John McCain and John Boehner.
For the citizenry living in the middle, who seemingly find moderates for either party acceptable, one has to wonder if they are aware of the expansive governmental control surrounding them due to this miscalculation. The unprecedented intrusion of the NSA, IRS and EPA and Obamacare waivers for big business and the ruling class are recent examples.
Some of the voters simply throw their hands into the air, disengaged, not only by the distractions of the day outlined in the works of Aldous Huxley but by the thought that those in contest are essentially the same, therefore placing little relevance regarding their vote.
This line of thinking was eloquently chronicled in an outstanding piece by Angelo Codevila, titled America's Ruling Class - And the Perils of Revolution in The America Spectator in 2010. "The only serious opposition to this arrogant Ruling Party is coming not from feckless Republicans but from what might be called the Country Party -- and its vision is revolutionary." This is a must read.
One thing is for sure. The current blueprint is unsustainable, and if we don't take the necessary steps to end the madness and employ the vision from the first Reagan inaugural speech by reawakening this industrial giant, forcing government back within its means in every arena and by lightening our punitive tax burden, we are destined for darkness.
Free market capitalism is the best path to prosperity, allowing entrepreneurship and individualism to flourish unleashing freedom and liberty across the fruited plain. Political action, from any party, to the contrary restricting these founding principles should be vehemently rejected, while still possible.
Monday, September 23, 2013
By Fires Unseen
It is time to "Cowboy Up".
When I was a kid, when I thought of cowboys, it was Heath and Nick Barkley of the Barkley family ranch in Stockton, California.
Times are much different today.
When I was a kid, when I thought of cowboys, it was Heath and Nick Barkley of the Barkley family ranch in Stockton, California.
 |
| Heath & Nick Barkley |
In these times, those of us on the side of freedom must not only fight the opponent, but fight the double agents who claim to be on our side as well.
This has been quite evident in recent weeks in the fight, led by Texas GOP Senator Ted Cruz and Utah GOP Senator Mike Lee to defund Obamacare. It is no longer Republicans versus Democrats on Obamacare, but as noted by Terresa Monroe-Hamilton over at Noisy Room, Tea Party Patriots versus Progressives, from both parties.
Sarah Palin told the 'Gutless and Rudderless’ GOP Establishment to ‘Stop the Ridiculous Hysterics’ and Stand Its Ground Against Obamacare.
As reported in an exclusive interview with Brietbart, Palin said “Open your eyes, America,” Palin continues. “When the full reality of Obamacare strikes home, we’ll thank God that principled leaders like Ted Cruz and Mike Lee took a stand to stop it in its tracks. “But the permanent political class is handwringing and howling that if there’s a government shutdown the media will blame Republicans for it. Here’s a little newsflash, GOP establishment: Whenever anything bad happens, the media blames Republicans for it. That’s not an excuse to roll over and play dead.”
With the GOP establishment and the entire left against the efforts by Cruz and Lee, Palin offers encouragement, tweeting "We have your backs, Ted and Mike! #DefundObamacare" We do to.
Unfortunately, the usual progressive weasels in the GOP are wanting to go along to get along, intoxicated with the power they currently have expressing little concern at the erosion of freedom engulfing the American citizenry seemingly on a daily basis.
With Sen. Cruz scheduled to appear with Chris Wallace on FOX News Sunday yesterday, Brietbart reported that Wallace, the host of Fox News Sunday, said that Republicans in Washington were savaging Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) behind Cruz's back before Cruz's appearance on the program to discuss defunding Obamacare.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell knows nothing, and Karl Rove, although not surprised, has no names. Mark Levin and Sarah Palin have called on FOX News to "keep it fair and balanced" and release the names of those who dropped dime. If only they would attack Democrats with the same vigor.
Two GOP members who have been vocal in their opposition to Cruz and Lee are Senator Lindsey Graham, R:SC, and Senator John McCain, R:AZ. I have never been a fan of Graham, who even when talking a big game, like getting to the bottom of the goings on in Benghazi, ends up doing nothing. Senator McCain is a man I had always respected, primarily due to his brave service to our nation. Although not my first choice, I strongly supported McCain in 2008, erroneously encouraged by his selection of Sarah Palin as VP and with vehement opposition to his opponent.
Seemingly since then, McCain has supported Obama more than those in the GOP aiming to defeat him. McCain, who is entertaining thoughts of supporting Hillary Clinton in 2016 and who called Cruz, Lee and Rand Paul "wacko birds, is the one who has lost sound mind from the Reagan Revolution he so proudly claims membership in. I now seek his retirement.
Sen. David Vitter, R:LA, is shopping around an amendment which would un-exempt members from an Obamacare carve out, but he is finding little support. As The Wizard points out, it is hard to gain traction when your own supposed team members are so vocal about being double agents.
Enough already. I stand firm in opposition to McCain, Graham, NH Sen. Kelly Ayotte, VA Rep. Eric Cantor, TN Sen. Lamar Alexander, NY Rep. Peter King, Speaker John Boehner, R:OH and NJ Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey among others.
With the monstrosity legislation of Obamacare at our doorstep, there has not been a more important time in many a moon to fight the establishment, those among the ruling class who believe they can provide lawful guidelines collectively for you to best live your life.
Nothing can command more control over you than associations with your health; including food consumption, exercise and fitness, lifestyle management and health options with respect to medicine authorizations ranging from prescriptions to invasive surgical options. and those death panels.
As Palin said; time to get on Cruz Control and put our all the fires unseen.
Thursday, September 12, 2013
2X4
Yet another stellar effort from award winning editorial cartoonist Michael Ramirez of Investor's Business Daily reminds us that we must never forget those patriots that have served our great nation. All gave some, some gave all.
Our elected officials are accountable to us, and we must continue to demand justice against those who have brought harm to our country. While one may conclude the efforts to hold those accountable for 9-11-01 have been satisfactory, the effort regarding Benghazi has been appalling, entangled by lies, distortion and deflection from our current leaders.
What difference does it make?
Contrary to the despicable accounting by Hillary Clinton, it makes all the difference in the world for our nation.
Never Forget!
 |
| Michael Ramirez/Investors Business Daily |
Thursday, September 5, 2013
Liars Lack Credibility
 |
| President Obama; Commander Clueless At Large |
"My credibility is not on the line," quipped President Obama today regarding his red line he never spoke of regarding the use of chemical weapons in Syria.
Problem is, Obama has no credibility.
"The international community’s credibility is on the line. And America’s and Congress’s credibility is on the line."
In response to appearing most weak, Obama throws the international community under the bus for attempting to set a level of standards in times of conflict that adhere to common decency and follows by hammering the Congress for being part of such an agreement.
The comments are really an effort to discredit Republicans and the use of force by those countries able to successfully conduct military operations. Only when the administration find the international community has the "responsibility to protect" would military action seem appropriate.
From the beginning of Obama's administration and his apology tour, there has not been an international relations plan anyone can make sense of. The Arab Spring was a disaster everyone but he and his staff saw in the making, and the orchestrated events in Lybia has moved the country into lawlessness and ruin and has resulted in Egypt in turmoil.
Furthermore, truth and the adherence to the rule of law have been absent, a critical matter of trust. One could surmise the administration has been less than forthcoming, but the fact of the matter is those the are charged to report to are left facing distortion, stonewalling, mistruths and deception.
This would include negotiations surrounding the auto bailouts, Fast and Furious, the stimulus, the unemployment rate, the NSA scandal, the IRS scandal and most notably, the events in Benghazi where four patriots, including our Ambassador, were murdered.
The administration is not credible, and Rep. Jeff Duncan, R:SC, made the charge while grilling Secretary of State John Kerry, who is an appalling individual, lacking character and credibility, who although serving in, has exhibited great disdain for our military over the years.
I have no access to any military intelligence and can only speculate on the real story from what I can ascertain from following the events, deciphering what I can from media reports and hearing testimonials. But, it seems clear chemical weapons were utilized in Syria.
However, in my opinion, there are a myriad of outstanding questions that must be addressed before we risk the lives of our servicemen. Primarily due to the mind boggling foreign policy of this administration, this situation has really become one were neither side, either the administration of Bashar al-Assad or the rebels made up of factions of Al-Queda and the Muslim Brotherhood, deserves any support from Uncle Sam.
Interestingly enough, we apparently know the issues in Syria like the palm of our hand but were paralyzed at the time and remain quite puzzled at what transpired in Benghazi. We actually thought is was because of a video. I don't buy it, and nor should you.
Going against Assad, as Obama is asking Congress for approval in doing, puts us on the side with the Muslim Brotherhood and factions of Al-Queda, both of whom I consider our enemies. Problem is, I doubt President Obama considers agrees. As Sen. Ted Cruz, R:TX, said, "we should not be “al-Qaeda’s air force."
The entire operation has come about quickly for some reason, with somewhat of a sense of urgency. I wonder why, but then again, there is golf, fundraising and world travel going on.
The case is weak, and we are asked by the same hypocrites who railed against George W. Bush, who had a library of info compared to Kerry's briefcase, to seemingly blindly accept their premise and jump on board.
No such luck with me. It is noted many seemingly knowledgeable people have, including Jennifer Rubin over at The Washington Post.
We should not tolerate the use of chemical weapons and there may be some additional reasons to be involved, but we have not been informed of what they may be. I got some ideas, coming up in a later post.
Certainly, I am not against military action when necessary, provided we go kick the ass out of our opponent and come home. For us to engage, there must be a strategic plan of action, rather than a rushed effort with no stated goal or end game.
In my view, the administration has presented themselves as liars ( perpetrators apprehended and punished in Benghazi?) and thieves (monetizing of the debt), misrepresenting and distorting facts ( no red line drawn). They are not to be trusted, and get no quarter from me.
Obama thinks he is loved from the night sky to the ocean floor, but only he and a few remaining Obamabots still think that. The truth of the matter is, that other than attempting to save what limited credibility Obama and the US still clings to on the world stage, there is no strategic US interest or reason to be involving ourselves, and placing at risk the treasure of our servicemen and women, in yet another middle east skirmish, particularly with no strategic plan.
Monday, July 29, 2013
Live The Liberal Dream
After initially informing the American people he was disturbed by the actions and would get to the bottom of each of these scandals, President Obama has hit the campaign trail. Yes, I know, or at least I think, he is not running for future office and has no need to campaign.
In a stunning exhibit of arrogance, speaking in front of low information voters sprinkled with handfuls of political hacks, President Obama is now calling each of the major scandals engulfing his administration "phony scandals".
To say this rhetoric from the man voted in as the leader of all Americans, not just his progressive Obamabots, is not becoming his office is a dramatic understatement. As usual, his comments are divisive, incorrect, arrogant and disrespectful to those he should be honored to govern. These comments highlight characteristics in an individual exhibiting a lack of common decency and void of leadership qualities, and thus his presiding over our decline should not come as a surprise.
 |
| Michael Ramirez, Investors Business Daily |
Truth has left the building, and the administration is on the attack against the few who dare to challenge. But with the mainstream media nothing more than a propaganda machine for Obama, although Peggy Noonan suggests America is no longer listening to Obama, few are engaged enough to decipher the misrepresentations of the truth presented the citizenry.
Each of the scandals President Obama references are beyond significant. Fast and Furious, Benghazi, AP, NSA and the IRS scandals are despicable. Provided adequate hearings take place, of which I am sadly doubtful, a handful seem impeachable offenses. In fact, the IRS scandal violates the Fourth Amendment, and for that reason among a hundred, we have called for the resignation of President Obama.
But while Obama dismisses the above mentioned scandals with a smirk, he informs us that Washington has taken its eye of the economy, and he intends to force them back on this troubling issue. Yes, the horrendous economy caused in large measure, by design, by the very policies implemented by the Obama administration and their ship of fools. Infuriating.
Obama, once again, informs the public he will focus "like a laser" on the economy, and they think change is on the brink. For those who have paid any attention, the speech lines are retreads from past speeches and unless there are major policy changes, and none are forthcoming, the economy will continue to under perform at best while America continues to decline into a structure of socialism, in violation of the founding principles of our nation.
It is claimed the unemployment rate has began to fall with America getting back to work, but the fact is the labor participation rate for full time employment is at its lowest rate since 1980, prior to the Reagan Revolution. It can be argued more jobs are being filled, but those are pat time jobs as workers have had hour reduced due to the implementation of Obamacare and now hold two positions to bring home the income one job used to. On side note, remember when the left yelled at George W. Bush, saying the jobs he created were McDonalds (MCD:NYSE) jobs? Some should be so lucky these days, but all is quiet at those broadcasting companies.
More individuals are receiving government entitlements than ever before, and it is no due to population shifts. Few have their unemployment benefits expire, but for those that have, disability relief is the next step. Everyone has some sort of issue, right. Aren't you a victim of this or that. I wish you would get over it, but Obama does not feel, but welcomes your pain so he can control yet another poor soul who has lost the ability to succeed on their own. Julia has arrived.
In fact, as the Associated Press reported today, Four out of 5 U.S. adults struggle with joblessness, near poverty or reliance on welfare for at least parts of their lives, a sign of deteriorating economic security and an elusive American dream. Forget Obama and his parade of bullcrap. Forget the GOP, the Democrats and Washington DC. Think of mainstreet, and how utterly unnecessarily sad this statistic is for our fellow man. Four of Five! 80%!
If you step back, you quickly realize this is not a sound road for our economy to be traveling, although Obama thinks it is. Why is he not alarmed about the peril of our citizens? Obama is quick to blame the GOP, but until Scott Brown got elected in the aftermath of the death of Sen. Edward Kennedy, the GOP could have golfed everyday with no consequence as the Democrats held a super majority. Even after Brown was elected, the GOP was nothing more than a speed bump, with only the roar to the Tea Party scaring anyone. Even, today, progressive republicans like John McCain, Kelly Ayotte and Lindsay Graham, and even the leadership of Boehner and Cantor, rarely fight Obama with vigor. You would think the entire Congress would be up in arms that 80% of our citizens are struggling so mightily, but I don't hear them.
Recent events, such as the Trayvon Martin-George Zimmerman shooting in Sanford, Florida, the abysmal record of deaths among young black teens in Obama's backyard in Chicago and the bankruptcy of Detroit have placed a spotlight on the black youth community. Under President Obama, black youth have not had it this bad in several decades if ever, and he has suggested zero in the form of legislation, unless you consider his efforts to undermine the Second amendment, to assist in solving the problem. We discussed the how solving this problem, although it would hurt the income streams of the race hustlers, would extend prosperity for all.
Sen. Mike Lee (R:UT) is attempting to defund Obamacare, a law polls show America dislikes, but few republicans in the senate are joining his fight. As Rush Limbaugh pointed out, many republicans are big government types the really are not all that broken up about Obamacare as it represents expanded control over Americans like you and me. Obamacare is a significantly destructive force against economic growth and freedom.
Yes, the stock market is at record highs, fueled by to many dollars chasing too few assets. Home prices are inching up due in part to a restricted inventory. Manipulated markets. Nothing to see here.
Everything is not fixed. In fact, although seemingly somewhat stable, the economy is much worse than thought. The administration policies of entitlements, handouts and bailouts, coupled with expansive taxation and regulation from within the EPA to Common Core in the public school system, the citizenry are being placed in a box. As AP correctly pointed out, due to these policies the American dream will be much harder to achieve, and economic insecurity among those who fail to exit the box will continue to grow.
This is not the America we grew up in, handicapped by a governor placed on the citizens by an oppressive government which, although with rhetoric to the contrary, is seeking to collapse the system leaving the citizenry clamoring for help in the form of entitlements. As history and traditions are given less importance, and work ethic, the standard of living decreases, the GDP embraces contraction, our superpower status evaporates and the majority of the citizens are left under the control of the government.
Robbing folks of their identity and destroying personal incentives fosters financial calamities and is destructive to the family leaving a country in despair.
Don't worry. Due to Obamacare, as the secretary determines, those death panels Sarah Palin warned you about are real, and provided you no longer can justify your existence and present no benefit to society, they will be happy to assist you.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
