President Trump announced that ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi has been killed at the hands of the US Special Forces. This is awesome news and world is a safer place as a result!
Baghdadi, while attempting to orchestrate horrific attacks on the United States, has been running his mouth for years. In the end, Baghdadi had nowhere to hide.
America should be thrilled, but as you may suspect, the left is feeling remorse at the loss of such an important religious world leader:
John Noonan destroyed WaPo in a tremendous tweet:
Thank you to the President Trump, the US Special Forces and the US Military for riding the world of this terrorist. Your nation is grateful.
In the end, Baghdadi had nowhere to hide. We also note the left and their mainstream media partners are no longer even attempting to hide; their allegiance.
Showing posts with label ISIS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ISIS. Show all posts
Sunday, October 27, 2019
Monday, June 12, 2017
Sunday, September 11, 2016
Never Forget
![]() |
The World Trade Center |
Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton ask the American people to have empathy for our enemies.
Christians are being killed at alarming levels, yet our president continues to call out republicans for their evil attempts to adhere to the Constitution. We have officially become a nation of men; not laws.
And we have countless enemies within. Those enemies within included our current Barack Obama, and Hillary Clinton. Please engage your voting actions accordingly.
Have you forgotten?
Windows on the world
Evil spit in our face on the morning of September 11, 2001. As America sought comfort on this horrendous day, most found God watching over us. We had faith, which helped us through the incredible grief. With evil lurking all around us, we found love, courage and faith standing tall in the fire.

I have not forgotten. Never Forget! Political correctness be damned, we must remain committed to taking out evil wherever it exists, foreign or domestic.
GOD BLESS AMERICA
*PORTIONS REPRINTED FROM 9-11-11 BLOGPOST.
Wednesday, July 20, 2016
Tuesday, June 28, 2016
No Sen. Nelson!
"Remember the human factor here. Now, because they were born in another country and are here illegally, these DREAMers are going to have to return to a country they don't know along with their parents. Now, that is what is sad" said Sen. Bill Nelson, D:FL.
No Sen. Nelson!
What is sad is that I am living in a country I don't know, exhibited every day now as I drive down S. Orange Ave in Orlando, where radical Islamic terrorists murdered 49 of our fellow citizens.
Yet, you and Obama continue to let thousands of refugees ISIS said they would infiltrate into America.
Sen. Nelson, you are nothing short of despicable!
Instead of worrying about the status of illegal immigrants currently here, how going after ISIS and sealing our border to help prevent the next terrorist attack perpetrated against the legal citizens of this country?
How the Democrats Do It by Rush Limbaugh
No Sen. Nelson!
What is sad is that I am living in a country I don't know, exhibited every day now as I drive down S. Orange Ave in Orlando, where radical Islamic terrorists murdered 49 of our fellow citizens.
Yet, you and Obama continue to let thousands of refugees ISIS said they would infiltrate into America.
Sen. Nelson, you are nothing short of despicable!
Instead of worrying about the status of illegal immigrants currently here, how going after ISIS and sealing our border to help prevent the next terrorist attack perpetrated against the legal citizens of this country?
How the Democrats Do It by Rush Limbaugh
Labels:
Bill Nelson,
Dreamers,
Immigration,
ISIS,
Orlando Terror,
Radical Islam,
Rush Limbaugh
Wednesday, June 22, 2016
Depressing and Deadly
Perhaps you just concluded watching "The Five" on Fox News Channel co-hosted by the lovely Kimberly Guilfoyle, but a depressing and deadly accurate article by Greg Gutfeld now requires your eyeballs.
"How can America defeat ISIS if we have vocal factions believing that we are worse? How can we fight the enemy if a large portion of our population thinks an inanimate object – a gun – caused Orlando?"
Damn good question.
Gutfeld: Orlando’s doom. The most depressing article you will ever share. Share it anyway by Greg Gutfeld
We will do just that!
The immediate consequences from the Orlando terror attack are obvious: dozens dead and maimed – families changed forever.
The next layer of consequences, arriving soon, are not as obvious, but they are coming. Here they are:
We are getting a divorce. First, a poll shows that Americans are pretty much divided on their opinions about the attack. Most of the Democrats see it as a gun control issue. Most Republicans see it as a terror attack. And there seems to be no sign of compromise (why can’t it be mostly “terror” and a little “guns?” asks the therapist, Dr. Gutfeld)
This poll hints at an ongoing, disturbing change in this country – one that brings forth a series of even more problems – those of which I see as almost unsolvable. We quarrel about the quarrel. We cannot agree on the fight. And therefore we cannot begin to fight. Instead, we are like that proverbial snake that devours its own tail. Except, we think it’s sushi. But it’s blowfish. You get the idea. We’re dead.
We assume different identities lead to different values. Does a black person, or a gay person or a fat white male, see a terror attack differently? I wouldn’t think so, but activists, talking heads and assorted thought-processors disagree. Now we no longer look at a tragedy as an American one, but through the divisive eyes of balkanized camps of competing identities.
An activist at the University of Missouri, during a vigil for the victims of Orlando, actually expressed disappointment that she had to speak in front of grievers, who happened by birth, to be white. My only relief comes from the fact that a few people heckled her (a brave gay couple). That relief left when others drowned them out.
The beat-down is dead. We need to train our populace on the basics of group self-defense – meaning how to cooperate and risk their skins to take down the lone aggressor.
If ten people attack a man with a gun, one or two may die – but the alternative is worse. “Be Like 93” should be the motto – in honor of the heroic actions of the passengers of Flight 93, who saved uncountable lives on September 11, 2001 by attacking the hijackers and bringing the jet down in a Pennsylvania field.
But that’s not what I’m really talking about. I mean justifiable aggression: explicitly meting out justice to those who deserve it. How can we do that, when we cannot agree who deserves it?
The New York Times blamed Republicans for Orlando. The Huffington Post blamed Christians. Every liberal blames guns, as well as the complicit wife of the murderous, terrorist dirtbag. And the dirtbag’s dad blames social networks. He’s even suing them.
The more we spread the condemnations around, the less we have for the truly guilty party. Hence our incremental approach to ISIS. President Obama treats the war on “terror” (a polite phrase for Islamism), like we’re playing Jenga. Slowly, and on rainy days.
We lose respect for evidence. Our inability to call a spade a spade is the result of divorcing cause from effect. If we can’t call Islamism out for this horribleness, then what’s left? Blame Guns. Christians. White Zinfindal. It’s as though you blame a massive wild fire not on dry tinder and a lit cigarette, but on poor self-esteem among carbon products.
Here’s science: Islamism preaches the murder of gays; then an Islamist murders a club full of gays. Cause…effect.
Why does the left deny science?
The way the media and our White House deny the effects of Islamism seems eerily similar to a certain industry we grew to loathe over time. Remember how the tobacco companies denied the role of their product in lung cancer? To deny that link, now, would have you laughed off the planet. My prediction: 20 years from now we will feel the same way about Islamism.
“Remember when we had a president who refused to admit the link between atrocity and Islamism” will be the same as “Remember when people used to say cigarettes didn’t cause cancer.”
Refusing to link Islamism to evil is denying the evidence before your objective eyes. You don’t even need to bring up Orlando. Try honor killings. Read up on the Taliban and what they do to girls who want to go to school. Google “Taliban” and “acid.”
President Obama isn’t just on the wrong side of history, he’s on the wrong side of the future. For a guy who claims to be all about science, he lives in a fairy tale.
We have murdered sympathy. A product of modern leftism’s regressive identity politics: we see victimhood as a zero-sum game. If you grieve for the victims of terror, is there any left for Black Lives Matter? If you light a candle for Orlando, why not for Ferguson?
If you aren’t gay, how are you able to sympathize with gay victims of terror?
What if you’re against gay marriage? Are you as evil as terrorists? Perhaps, some might say (or have said).
One anchor at another network actually chided a sympathizing politician, in the state where the terror took place… because she did not support gay rights enough to his satisfaction. I was bummed he’d play bouncer to the “Who gets to grieve” night club. That’s beneath him. Obama was against gay marriage just a handful of years ago, my friend.
Now sympathy is saddled with considerations for approval of other groups and classes. Maybe just keep quiet instead of expressing sympathy, one might conclude.
We have killed debate. To better enhance well-being, one must be able to argue and even allow oneself to be proven wrong. Science is all about that: prove me wrong, please. Now, no one wants to be wrong, even when it’s an abstract debate.
Look, I think the gun control debate is a deflection from the core concern, which is terror. But I’m willing to listen to some common sense, or at least informed opinions on how to prevent terrorists from getting guns. Sadly, the gun control argument is a misleading one: used not to ban guns (we know it ain’t happening), but to drive the debate away from the more volatile issue, which Islamism’s universal plans.
And! – wouldn’t it be nice to talk about gun control with people who actually knew something about guns? Or control? If Orlando had been done not by gun, but by bomb -- where would the left’s argument be? Where it was, after Boston. Nowhere.
We have disabled our impulse control. My motto has always been: your first public thought is often your worst public thought. Meaning: think before unloading.
We now know that this is an impossible wish in this current climate of Twitter, Facebook and Piers Morgan. What happened to reserve? Contemplation? Thoughtfulness? What about waiting a few days before you spout an opinion?
Now every celebrity and their less famous sibling is on Twitter lecturing us on “assault weapons” and “tolerance” as if the world right now really needs a hot take from a sitcom star on his third bout of chlamydia.
The strong and silent type has been replaced with the weak and loud. I’d include myself in this, except that I only speak when spoken to. Otherwise, I sit quietly in a corner and drink copious amounts of wine.
We no longer cooperate. This sad and sober consequence is the result of combining all the results mentioned above together. Without cooperation, society is doomed. Cooperation contributes to better lives, over all. If what’s good for you, is good for them you help them get what you have.
That’s not the case in this era of moral relativism.
The problem is: we no longer believe that what we have is good. How can America defeat ISIS if we have vocal factions believing that we are worse? How can we fight the enemy if a large portion of our population thinks an inanimate object – a gun – caused Orlando? And not this pernicious ideology you can’t even call a death cult, because radical Islam is worse than that? It’s a death movement. A death phenomenon. It’s a force that sees our conscious lives as inferior to what happens after you die. Which is why, for them, killing gays is an act of love. They’re doing those sinners a favor – in their twisted skulls, killing innocents in a night club just gave the murdered a Fast Pass to Nirvana.
Boy, this is a depressing article. And I wrote it.
Read it and weep. For the victims. For the country. For your family. For you and me.
Bravo Greg Gutfeld!
"How can America defeat ISIS if we have vocal factions believing that we are worse? How can we fight the enemy if a large portion of our population thinks an inanimate object – a gun – caused Orlando?"
Damn good question.
Gutfeld: Orlando’s doom. The most depressing article you will ever share. Share it anyway by Greg Gutfeld
We will do just that!
The immediate consequences from the Orlando terror attack are obvious: dozens dead and maimed – families changed forever.
The next layer of consequences, arriving soon, are not as obvious, but they are coming. Here they are:
We are getting a divorce. First, a poll shows that Americans are pretty much divided on their opinions about the attack. Most of the Democrats see it as a gun control issue. Most Republicans see it as a terror attack. And there seems to be no sign of compromise (why can’t it be mostly “terror” and a little “guns?” asks the therapist, Dr. Gutfeld)
This poll hints at an ongoing, disturbing change in this country – one that brings forth a series of even more problems – those of which I see as almost unsolvable. We quarrel about the quarrel. We cannot agree on the fight. And therefore we cannot begin to fight. Instead, we are like that proverbial snake that devours its own tail. Except, we think it’s sushi. But it’s blowfish. You get the idea. We’re dead.
"How can America defeat ISIS if we have vocal factions believing that we are worse? How can we fight the enemy if a large portion of our population thinks an inanimate object – a gun – caused Orlando?"
We assume different identities lead to different values. Does a black person, or a gay person or a fat white male, see a terror attack differently? I wouldn’t think so, but activists, talking heads and assorted thought-processors disagree. Now we no longer look at a tragedy as an American one, but through the divisive eyes of balkanized camps of competing identities.
An activist at the University of Missouri, during a vigil for the victims of Orlando, actually expressed disappointment that she had to speak in front of grievers, who happened by birth, to be white. My only relief comes from the fact that a few people heckled her (a brave gay couple). That relief left when others drowned them out.
The beat-down is dead. We need to train our populace on the basics of group self-defense – meaning how to cooperate and risk their skins to take down the lone aggressor.
If ten people attack a man with a gun, one or two may die – but the alternative is worse. “Be Like 93” should be the motto – in honor of the heroic actions of the passengers of Flight 93, who saved uncountable lives on September 11, 2001 by attacking the hijackers and bringing the jet down in a Pennsylvania field.
But that’s not what I’m really talking about. I mean justifiable aggression: explicitly meting out justice to those who deserve it. How can we do that, when we cannot agree who deserves it?
The New York Times blamed Republicans for Orlando. The Huffington Post blamed Christians. Every liberal blames guns, as well as the complicit wife of the murderous, terrorist dirtbag. And the dirtbag’s dad blames social networks. He’s even suing them.
The more we spread the condemnations around, the less we have for the truly guilty party. Hence our incremental approach to ISIS. President Obama treats the war on “terror” (a polite phrase for Islamism), like we’re playing Jenga. Slowly, and on rainy days.
We lose respect for evidence. Our inability to call a spade a spade is the result of divorcing cause from effect. If we can’t call Islamism out for this horribleness, then what’s left? Blame Guns. Christians. White Zinfindal. It’s as though you blame a massive wild fire not on dry tinder and a lit cigarette, but on poor self-esteem among carbon products.
Here’s science: Islamism preaches the murder of gays; then an Islamist murders a club full of gays. Cause…effect.
Why does the left deny science?
The way the media and our White House deny the effects of Islamism seems eerily similar to a certain industry we grew to loathe over time. Remember how the tobacco companies denied the role of their product in lung cancer? To deny that link, now, would have you laughed off the planet. My prediction: 20 years from now we will feel the same way about Islamism.
“Remember when we had a president who refused to admit the link between atrocity and Islamism” will be the same as “Remember when people used to say cigarettes didn’t cause cancer.”
Refusing to link Islamism to evil is denying the evidence before your objective eyes. You don’t even need to bring up Orlando. Try honor killings. Read up on the Taliban and what they do to girls who want to go to school. Google “Taliban” and “acid.”
President Obama isn’t just on the wrong side of history, he’s on the wrong side of the future. For a guy who claims to be all about science, he lives in a fairy tale.
We have murdered sympathy. A product of modern leftism’s regressive identity politics: we see victimhood as a zero-sum game. If you grieve for the victims of terror, is there any left for Black Lives Matter? If you light a candle for Orlando, why not for Ferguson?
If you aren’t gay, how are you able to sympathize with gay victims of terror?
What if you’re against gay marriage? Are you as evil as terrorists? Perhaps, some might say (or have said).
One anchor at another network actually chided a sympathizing politician, in the state where the terror took place… because she did not support gay rights enough to his satisfaction. I was bummed he’d play bouncer to the “Who gets to grieve” night club. That’s beneath him. Obama was against gay marriage just a handful of years ago, my friend.
Now sympathy is saddled with considerations for approval of other groups and classes. Maybe just keep quiet instead of expressing sympathy, one might conclude.
We have killed debate. To better enhance well-being, one must be able to argue and even allow oneself to be proven wrong. Science is all about that: prove me wrong, please. Now, no one wants to be wrong, even when it’s an abstract debate.
Look, I think the gun control debate is a deflection from the core concern, which is terror. But I’m willing to listen to some common sense, or at least informed opinions on how to prevent terrorists from getting guns. Sadly, the gun control argument is a misleading one: used not to ban guns (we know it ain’t happening), but to drive the debate away from the more volatile issue, which Islamism’s universal plans.
And! – wouldn’t it be nice to talk about gun control with people who actually knew something about guns? Or control? If Orlando had been done not by gun, but by bomb -- where would the left’s argument be? Where it was, after Boston. Nowhere.
We have disabled our impulse control. My motto has always been: your first public thought is often your worst public thought. Meaning: think before unloading.
We now know that this is an impossible wish in this current climate of Twitter, Facebook and Piers Morgan. What happened to reserve? Contemplation? Thoughtfulness? What about waiting a few days before you spout an opinion?
Now every celebrity and their less famous sibling is on Twitter lecturing us on “assault weapons” and “tolerance” as if the world right now really needs a hot take from a sitcom star on his third bout of chlamydia.
The strong and silent type has been replaced with the weak and loud. I’d include myself in this, except that I only speak when spoken to. Otherwise, I sit quietly in a corner and drink copious amounts of wine.
We no longer cooperate. This sad and sober consequence is the result of combining all the results mentioned above together. Without cooperation, society is doomed. Cooperation contributes to better lives, over all. If what’s good for you, is good for them you help them get what you have.
That’s not the case in this era of moral relativism.
The problem is: we no longer believe that what we have is good. How can America defeat ISIS if we have vocal factions believing that we are worse? How can we fight the enemy if a large portion of our population thinks an inanimate object – a gun – caused Orlando? And not this pernicious ideology you can’t even call a death cult, because radical Islam is worse than that? It’s a death movement. A death phenomenon. It’s a force that sees our conscious lives as inferior to what happens after you die. Which is why, for them, killing gays is an act of love. They’re doing those sinners a favor – in their twisted skulls, killing innocents in a night club just gave the murdered a Fast Pass to Nirvana.
Boy, this is a depressing article. And I wrote it.
Read it and weep. For the victims. For the country. For your family. For you and me.
Bravo Greg Gutfeld!
Tuesday, June 14, 2016
Orlando Terror
Radical Islam strikes again in the SODO district in the heart of downtown Orlando.
Terrorism is alive and well contrary to media reports and the bumbling of President Obama. When will America wake up!
Is anybody paying attention?
"ISIS Announced Florida Threat THREE Days Ago: “We Will Attack Florida!”
ISIS Muslim terrorists released a statement on their plan to attack Florida, and even put out a list with the names of people in Florida that they plan on killing."
Our president refuses to identify the enemy, and is making feeble if any efforts to eliminate them. Given the failure to face this evil with adequate force, no wonder the Trump train is gaining momentum! Americans have had enough!
“Our nation is at war. From 9/11 to the Boston Marathon, from Fort Hood to Chattanooga, from San Bernardino to last night’s horrific attack in Orlando, radical Islamic terrorism has declared jihad on America.” “It is a time for action. We need a Commander in Chief who will speak the truth, and who will unleash the full force and fury of the American military to utterly destroy ISIS and its affiliates." ---Sen. Ted Cruz (R:TX)
As we expressed in previous posts, we had little doubt a terrorist act was imminent; however we had no idea it would occur in our own back yard.
We also had noted repeatedly Obama is not only the worst president ever but the first anti-American president.
Obama is literally on the other team, and Donald Trump just eluded to it, noting "He doesn't get it or he gets it better than anybody understands. It's one or the other, and either one is unacceptable." "We're led by a man who is a very -- look, we're led by a man that either is, is not tough, not smart, or he's got something else in mind," which we consider to be the destruction of the United States of America as you have known her.
Sadly, we fear this is only the beginning of a very rough summer.
Everything you need to know about the Orlando terror attack is presented in the report from WFTV-ABC9 Orlando, with famed anchor Bob Opshal reporting.
President Obama, elected (sadly) to be OUR President, cannot bring himself to reach out to Florida Gov. Rick Scott as of this AM regarding the worst single shooting incident, an act of terrorism committed no just against the LGBT community, Latinos or Floridians, but against The United States of America. George W. Bush has done so, but not the petulant Obama. He is nothing short of a complete disgrace, and we will be most fortunate not to have many more Americans fall victim to terrorism before he exits office.
In a rather stunning speech today, a petulant Obama hunkered down in defense of Islam essentially blaming America for the grotesque loss of life in Orlando. Obama took a shot at Trump, as did Hillary in a follow up speech. But it is Trump who has accurately assessed the real issue, radical Islamic terrorists, and make no mistake, it is the left, led by these two anti-American elites, and their policies, that are in large measure to blame for this terrorism. As Katie Hopkins illustrated in a brilliant piece today, "Perhaps it is those who preach tolerance that we should be most afraid of. Democrats and liberals preach tolerance. But in doing so they have chosen to ignore the dark truths of a religion which is the most intolerant of all."
While Obama searches for a motive, The Daily Caller brings us stunning information about Orlando killer Omar Matteen. “It is no coincidence that this happened in Orlando,” a law enforcement source told Fox News Sunday." "Omar Mateen, the perpetrator of the terror attack in Orlando, was enrolled in an online Islamic fundamental course ran by a radical Muslim released from prison last year" named Marcus Dwayne Robertson, who runs a school in Orlando known as the Timbuktu Seminary. Robertson is reported to be the former bodyguard of Omar Abdel Rahman, otherwise known as the Blind Sheik, the mastermind of the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center.
The motive of the terrorist act in Orlando is known to everybody and anybody, except our anti-American president whose dereliction of duty is getting folks killed, which just might be considered treason.
The events of a tragic weekend in The City Beautiful will leave our town scared forever.
On Friday night, emerging star Christina Grimmie was gunned down by a crazed individual signing autographs after a show at The Plaza Live over in The Milk District. We all were very saddened.
But, the terrorism events of early Sunday morning at The Pulse over in the SODO district floored our entire nation.
We remain at war with radical Islamic terrorists whether our anti-American president is aware of it or not. It is rather obvious Obama will not take any steps to destroy ISIS, so perhaps it will come down to the citizenry.
Or Donald J. Trump.
Wednesday, May 25, 2016
Read Between The LInes
"One name continues to surface as a trusted Trump adviser and go-to man on intelligence and national security: Retired Army Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, a well-known and outspoken critic of the Obama administration’s campaign against ISIS and its foreign policy" reports The Daily Beast.
EXCELLENT!
Gen. Flynn has been doing everything he can to warn the American public about the degree of danger this nation is in, from enemies foreign, and domestic.
You are being warned!
Back in January, in an interview with Megyn Kelly of FOX News, retired Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, speaking between the lines, is doing everything he can to warn you the level of peril the US is in under our "enemy within" president.
High ranking members of the military, even those who are retired, must choose their words very carefully, as words matter. However, it is obvious Lieutenant General Flynn had a message for America he was compelled to give.
Please listen.
EXCELLENT!
Gen. Flynn has been doing everything he can to warn the American public about the degree of danger this nation is in, from enemies foreign, and domestic.
You are being warned!
Back in January, in an interview with Megyn Kelly of FOX News, retired Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, speaking between the lines, is doing everything he can to warn you the level of peril the US is in under our "enemy within" president.
High ranking members of the military, even those who are retired, must choose their words very carefully, as words matter. However, it is obvious Lieutenant General Flynn had a message for America he was compelled to give.
Please listen.
Labels:
Donald Trump,
Foreign Policy,
FOX News,
Gen. Micheal Flynn,
ISIS,
Megyn Kelly,
Terrorism
Sunday, January 31, 2016
Covert Martial Law?
"While you were following the snowstorm, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R:KY) was busy preparing the way for a proposal". “This resolution is a total rewrite of the War Powers Clause in the U.S. Constitution,” said Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CN). “It is essentially a declaration of international martial law, a sweeping transfer of military power to the president that will allow him or her to send U.S. troops almost anywhere in the world, for almost any reason, with absolutely no limitations.” "AUMF, written by Sen. Lindsey Graham, (R:SC), is packaged as a proposal to fight the Islamic State group — but it would also allow the president to deploy military forces anywhere he chooses and for as long as he wants" wrote Voice of Reason.
As noted by Investment Watch Blog, this proposal could open the door to covertly allow Martial Law on US streets.
Obama can kick the ass of ISIS any hour he decides, but continues to choose not to.
Obama is interested in punishing his domestic enemies, and VP Biden has previously described Tea Party members as terrorists. What you consider terrorists are freedom fighters to Obama. Who would be considered terrorists should civil unrest occur after an economic collapse?
No matter.
No President should be given unlimited war powers, and those who effort to operate outside the Constitution should be considered enemies of our nation.
As noted by Investment Watch Blog, this proposal could open the door to covertly allow Martial Law on US streets.
Obama can kick the ass of ISIS any hour he decides, but continues to choose not to.
Obama is interested in punishing his domestic enemies, and VP Biden has previously described Tea Party members as terrorists. What you consider terrorists are freedom fighters to Obama. Who would be considered terrorists should civil unrest occur after an economic collapse?
No matter.
No President should be given unlimited war powers, and those who effort to operate outside the Constitution should be considered enemies of our nation.
Labels:
9-11,
AUMF,
Barack Obama,
Chris Murphy,
Constitution,
ISIS,
Lindsey Graham,
Martial Law,
Mitch McConnell,
Terrorism,
US Military
Monday, January 4, 2016
The Enemy; Foreign and Domestic
ISIS is being utilized by those seeking an Ottoman Empire style caliphate as a cleansing mechanism.
It is very important to understand that "we can destroy ISIS tomorrow, but we will still be in an extended war with a hundred other groups who all have a vision for restoring the Caliphate. This war will never end until we crush their supremacist agenda by demonstrating that we will never again allow such a horror to exist on this earth. As long as Muslim groups hold out hope for a restoration of the Caliphate this war, in its various forms, will go on".
Whether the Obama administration admits it or not, we are at war. Exacerbating the issue is that President Obama is on the side seeking the caliphate, while the greater majority of America is not; and few even know, or God forbid, even care.
IT’S NOT ISIS WE NEED TO BEAT -- IT’S THE CALIPHATE. Understanding the Caliphate Curve
by Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.
It is very important to understand that "we can destroy ISIS tomorrow, but we will still be in an extended war with a hundred other groups who all have a vision for restoring the Caliphate. This war will never end until we crush their supremacist agenda by demonstrating that we will never again allow such a horror to exist on this earth. As long as Muslim groups hold out hope for a restoration of the Caliphate this war, in its various forms, will go on".
Whether the Obama administration admits it or not, we are at war. Exacerbating the issue is that President Obama is on the side seeking the caliphate, while the greater majority of America is not; and few even know, or God forbid, even care.
IT’S NOT ISIS WE NEED TO BEAT -- IT’S THE CALIPHATE. Understanding the Caliphate Curve
by Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.
Labels:
Barack Obama,
Global War on Terror,
ISIS,
Ottoman Empire,
Radical Islam
Sunday, December 20, 2015
The Left Wing Immigration Plot
It appears the light bulb in the head of Bill O'Reilly, who hosts The O'Reilly Factor on FOX News Channel, has finally gone off! Welcome Bill! It is great to have you recognize what most of us have known for quite some time.
The progressive left, in large measure led by the Obama administration, have many avenues of attack in their effort to transform the United States of America, and an open borders policy bringing illegal aliens into this country without congressional approval and against the will of the people is chief among them.
O'Reilly has had enough:
Regrettably, the invasion of illegal immigrants has been going on for quite some time; a number of years actually. But it is within the past 18 months of so it has really gotten the attention of the nation.
O'Reilly is steamed over his proposal of Kates Law, and rightfully so. O'Reilly became involved after the senseless murder of a beautiful young woman, Kate Steinle. The law O'Reilly is behind is really common sense, with provisions you would think everyone could get behind.
But, not when you are speaking about the progressive left, who champion open borders as part of their dream of transforming America, even if young American citizens are murdered in cold blood on the seemingly safe streets of a cosmopolitan city like San Francisco.
Open borders are an assault on private property, and the sovereignty of our nation, as a nation without borders is not a nation.
The left views America as an oppressive nation, and feel our prosperity is ill-gotten, having taken advantage of nations across the globe and leaving them impoverished and lacking in the levels of prosperity and advancement the United States has achieved.
Not to diminish the death of Ms.Steinle, but the ramifications of the invasion of our nation by illegal immigrants are much more far reaching, and extremely dangerous.
We noted last year the tens of thousands of illegal immigrants that seemingly out of nowhere began invading our southern border. While this was presented as a rare confluence of events that brought all these folks to converge on our southern border, it was in fact an orchestrated event with full knowledge and blessings of the Obama administration.
Beyond the events on the southern border last year, without congressional approval, for some time President Obama has been bring illegal immigrants to America. In fact, The Independent Sentinel reports the following:
Videos and other reports have been popping up on the Internet claiming the federal government is sneaking in thousands of refugees in the dead of night and liberal activists who run fact checking organizations like snipes say it’s not true. However, we now have a sheriff’s constable swearing it is true.
UPS is bringing refugees in on their flights in the middle of the night, according to a Marcus Kohan, a PA constable. We have no idea who they are and if they have been screened. Americans’ representatives in Congress are supposed to be deciding who comes into the country and how many come in, not a dictator in the White House and the government officials he pays off with tax dollars, and if this is true, he should be impeached.
When we first saw the story from The Independent Sentinel, we filed it away and waited for some sort of confirmation. That confirmation came in a report from FOX News, that stated "A proposal to admit 10,000 Syrian refugees to the United States has ignited a bitter debate in Washington, but more than 10 times that number of people from the embattled country have quietly come to America since 2012, according to figures obtained by FOXNews.com."
We recognized Obama sought the influx of illegal immigrants to make America as non-colonialist as possible, transferring wealth to the refugees and bloat the democratic voter rolls. Very troubling reports of his social engineering objectives centering around the diversity of neighborhoods. They are tied together, as former Florida congressman Allen West reports.
They need the fundamental demographic change of America in order to maintain their hold on power. This HUD rule will certainly be aimed at communities where the voting demographic does not favor the left. If they’re successful in this endeavor, then “Katy bar the door.”
As The American Legislator reports:
One of the most egregious items is the new Housing and Urban Development (HUD) rules on housing, called the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH), which will strip away local control of planning and development across the country. In brief, HUD’s new rule forces local governments to accept the federal government’s plans of how any new housing developments will incorporate low income housing regardless of location or access to public transportation. If the AFFH ruling is passed, it will take away the most fundamental role of local governments in regards to land use, zoning and urban planning.
While Obama gleefully admires himself for making good on his promise to transform the United States, I am not sure even he thought the influx of immigrants would start killing us.
They are.
Among the refugees entering our nation are embedded members of ISIS. They are here. Attacks similar to the one that occurred in San Bernardino will take place again in the future, and likely soon.
Based upon Obama continuing to release prisoners and empty our jails and taking little to no action to attack the terrorists murdering our citizens while lecturing us and threatening to circumvent the second amendment to go after our guns, it is more than reasonable to conclude he is not particularly concerned about it.
It is all part of the plan of Obama. The plan includes the rise of an Islamic and Muslim nation in the middle east with a caliphate established, and the diminishing of America on the world stage. President Obama does not consider himself an American, rather a global citizen who happens to make his home in America.
I suspect Obama is thrilled at the success he is having in transforming this nation, without any significant brush back from the Congress. The plot to destroy America as we have known her from within is working with imagined success. It is truly stunning, and most dangerous.
The progressive left, in large measure led by the Obama administration, have many avenues of attack in their effort to transform the United States of America, and an open borders policy bringing illegal aliens into this country without congressional approval and against the will of the people is chief among them.
O'Reilly has had enough:
Regrettably, the invasion of illegal immigrants has been going on for quite some time; a number of years actually. But it is within the past 18 months of so it has really gotten the attention of the nation.
O'Reilly is steamed over his proposal of Kates Law, and rightfully so. O'Reilly became involved after the senseless murder of a beautiful young woman, Kate Steinle. The law O'Reilly is behind is really common sense, with provisions you would think everyone could get behind.
But, not when you are speaking about the progressive left, who champion open borders as part of their dream of transforming America, even if young American citizens are murdered in cold blood on the seemingly safe streets of a cosmopolitan city like San Francisco.
Open borders are an assault on private property, and the sovereignty of our nation, as a nation without borders is not a nation.
The left views America as an oppressive nation, and feel our prosperity is ill-gotten, having taken advantage of nations across the globe and leaving them impoverished and lacking in the levels of prosperity and advancement the United States has achieved.
Not to diminish the death of Ms.Steinle, but the ramifications of the invasion of our nation by illegal immigrants are much more far reaching, and extremely dangerous.
We noted last year the tens of thousands of illegal immigrants that seemingly out of nowhere began invading our southern border. While this was presented as a rare confluence of events that brought all these folks to converge on our southern border, it was in fact an orchestrated event with full knowledge and blessings of the Obama administration.
Beyond the events on the southern border last year, without congressional approval, for some time President Obama has been bring illegal immigrants to America. In fact, The Independent Sentinel reports the following:
Videos and other reports have been popping up on the Internet claiming the federal government is sneaking in thousands of refugees in the dead of night and liberal activists who run fact checking organizations like snipes say it’s not true. However, we now have a sheriff’s constable swearing it is true.
UPS is bringing refugees in on their flights in the middle of the night, according to a Marcus Kohan, a PA constable. We have no idea who they are and if they have been screened. Americans’ representatives in Congress are supposed to be deciding who comes into the country and how many come in, not a dictator in the White House and the government officials he pays off with tax dollars, and if this is true, he should be impeached.
When we first saw the story from The Independent Sentinel, we filed it away and waited for some sort of confirmation. That confirmation came in a report from FOX News, that stated "A proposal to admit 10,000 Syrian refugees to the United States has ignited a bitter debate in Washington, but more than 10 times that number of people from the embattled country have quietly come to America since 2012, according to figures obtained by FOXNews.com."
We recognized Obama sought the influx of illegal immigrants to make America as non-colonialist as possible, transferring wealth to the refugees and bloat the democratic voter rolls. Very troubling reports of his social engineering objectives centering around the diversity of neighborhoods. They are tied together, as former Florida congressman Allen West reports.
They need the fundamental demographic change of America in order to maintain their hold on power. This HUD rule will certainly be aimed at communities where the voting demographic does not favor the left. If they’re successful in this endeavor, then “Katy bar the door.”
As The American Legislator reports:
One of the most egregious items is the new Housing and Urban Development (HUD) rules on housing, called the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH), which will strip away local control of planning and development across the country. In brief, HUD’s new rule forces local governments to accept the federal government’s plans of how any new housing developments will incorporate low income housing regardless of location or access to public transportation. If the AFFH ruling is passed, it will take away the most fundamental role of local governments in regards to land use, zoning and urban planning.
While Obama gleefully admires himself for making good on his promise to transform the United States, I am not sure even he thought the influx of immigrants would start killing us.
They are.
Among the refugees entering our nation are embedded members of ISIS. They are here. Attacks similar to the one that occurred in San Bernardino will take place again in the future, and likely soon.
Based upon Obama continuing to release prisoners and empty our jails and taking little to no action to attack the terrorists murdering our citizens while lecturing us and threatening to circumvent the second amendment to go after our guns, it is more than reasonable to conclude he is not particularly concerned about it.
It is all part of the plan of Obama. The plan includes the rise of an Islamic and Muslim nation in the middle east with a caliphate established, and the diminishing of America on the world stage. President Obama does not consider himself an American, rather a global citizen who happens to make his home in America.
I suspect Obama is thrilled at the success he is having in transforming this nation, without any significant brush back from the Congress. The plot to destroy America as we have known her from within is working with imagined success. It is truly stunning, and most dangerous.
Labels:
Allen West,
Barack Obama,
Bill O'Reilly,
HUD,
Immigration,
ISIS,
Islam,
Muslim,
Open Borders,
Private Property,
Terrorism
Wednesday, December 9, 2015
On The Stump, The Media Trumped
GOP Presidential candidate Donald Trump released a statement just at a campaign event Monday evening which has caused the mainstream media to lose their ever loving mind. Please see the following statement Trump read at the campaign event.
The media could not help themselves; after all, it afforded the opportunity to step the nation away from focusing on the stunning, abysmal failure on terrorism of the Obama administration.
It also gave the establishment GOP ruling class a highly sought after opportunity to body slam Trump, who with his substantial poll numbers strikes them with more fear than the ISIS terrorists the have miserably failed to contain.
As usual, Trump crashes on the scene like an out of control garbage truck firing out rhetoric that seemingly is outlandish and extreme. At least that is how it is reported in the media. Every Tom, Dick and Harry is aghast at Trump's statement, with GOP members joining in with the media in lambasting Trump for having the gall to insult our friends in the Muslim community and our allies that are Muslim nations overseas.
Among the overcrowded list include GOP Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R:SC), and even Carly Fiorina, sadly. As Bill Bonner reported, Jeb Bush says he’s “unhinged”…Chris Christie says he has “no idea what [he’s] talking about”…John Kasich accuses him of “outrageous divisiveness”…and Marco Rubio describes him as “offensive and outlandish.” And those are just his fellow Republicans! “Reprehensible… prejudiced…” adds Hillary Clinton.
Not all are against Trump on this issue. Rush Limbaugh does not find it unreasonable. Rand Paul, a fierce critic of Trump on the campaign stump, has previously proposed a plan which was aimed at banning immigration from countries in the Middle East where radical Islam is a big problem. Additionally, Sarah Palin had previously called for profiling of Muslims. Sounds reasonable to me.
While Trump did not do a good job in articulating his objectives, and was actually vague in outlining his potential actions, the premise of his remarks, which we consider to be "calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on" quite reasonable given some simple, "common sense" criteria in application.
It is not unprecedented in this nation. Under number eight of US Code 1182, inadmissible aliens, a law written in 1952 called the Nationality Act, "Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by president. Whenever the president finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, the president may, by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or non-immigrants or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate."
In fact, President Jimmy Carter utilized it to keep Iranians (Obama's good friends) out of our nation during the hostage crisis. Carter, who for those out to lunch, was and still is a staunch Democrat (and a horrible president), actually ordered the deportation of a large number of Iranians.
It is not Donald Trump that is extreme and seeking to derail long standing principles of this nation; that would be transformer in chief Barack Obama. Obama has opened the floodgates to illegal immigrants with Muslim backgrounds.
It would certainly appear that Trump is channeling his inner "Art of the Deal" negotiation strategy, invoking the Overton Window theory regarding immigration in this country.
All illegal immigration needs to be immediately stopped, with the borders (north and south) being sealed. Although the president told us otherwise (liar in chief), US officials admit ISIS is planting operatives among the tens of thousand women, children and orphans invading our nation on a daily basis, which without question, poses significant national security issues.
The legal process of immigration, a process that is heartily welcomed and needed for the survival of our nation, must be promptly streamlined and redesigned to meet the myriad of new challenges the act presents. While there are significant measures to be enacted, and far reaching legalities to be considered, it is not a process that could not be tackled appropriately within 60 days.
Those who are already here who commit a felony crime will be immediately deported if found guilty be our legal process. A plan for those who entered illegally must be drawn up, which include penalties. We have laws, and those whose first act in stepping foot in our nation is to break the law must be assessed punitive penalties.
Many have cited Constitutional issues with Trump's outline for a plan. Call me crazy, but illegal immigrants are not protect by the US Constitution, as they have no legal rights. As of now, and not for the lack of effort by Obama, we are not an open society where all the world is entitled to the benefits of being an American citizen.
Many are very concerned about Trump supposedly insulting the Muslim community. I am far more offended about Obama insulting us, lecturing us repeatedly about how wonderful Islam and the people of that religion are.
Trump is playing everyone. But he is correct. We are at war, and it is beyond nonsensical to allow our nation to be invaded by illegal immigrants from nations that wish us harm, many who belong to a religion that deems us infidels and ultimately seek the establishment of a caliphate to ultimately rule the word. Their words, and the teachings of the Quran, say it is so.
Don't let the lamestream media trump you. Yes, shut the borders down immediately, and allow no more illegal immigration.
The media could not help themselves; after all, it afforded the opportunity to step the nation away from focusing on the stunning, abysmal failure on terrorism of the Obama administration.
It also gave the establishment GOP ruling class a highly sought after opportunity to body slam Trump, who with his substantial poll numbers strikes them with more fear than the ISIS terrorists the have miserably failed to contain.
As usual, Trump crashes on the scene like an out of control garbage truck firing out rhetoric that seemingly is outlandish and extreme. At least that is how it is reported in the media. Every Tom, Dick and Harry is aghast at Trump's statement, with GOP members joining in with the media in lambasting Trump for having the gall to insult our friends in the Muslim community and our allies that are Muslim nations overseas.
Among the overcrowded list include GOP Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R:SC), and even Carly Fiorina, sadly. As Bill Bonner reported, Jeb Bush says he’s “unhinged”…Chris Christie says he has “no idea what [he’s] talking about”…John Kasich accuses him of “outrageous divisiveness”…and Marco Rubio describes him as “offensive and outlandish.” And those are just his fellow Republicans! “Reprehensible… prejudiced…” adds Hillary Clinton.
Not all are against Trump on this issue. Rush Limbaugh does not find it unreasonable. Rand Paul, a fierce critic of Trump on the campaign stump, has previously proposed a plan which was aimed at banning immigration from countries in the Middle East where radical Islam is a big problem. Additionally, Sarah Palin had previously called for profiling of Muslims. Sounds reasonable to me.
While Trump did not do a good job in articulating his objectives, and was actually vague in outlining his potential actions, the premise of his remarks, which we consider to be "calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on" quite reasonable given some simple, "common sense" criteria in application.
It is not unprecedented in this nation. Under number eight of US Code 1182, inadmissible aliens, a law written in 1952 called the Nationality Act, "Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by president. Whenever the president finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, the president may, by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or non-immigrants or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate."
In fact, President Jimmy Carter utilized it to keep Iranians (Obama's good friends) out of our nation during the hostage crisis. Carter, who for those out to lunch, was and still is a staunch Democrat (and a horrible president), actually ordered the deportation of a large number of Iranians.
It is not Donald Trump that is extreme and seeking to derail long standing principles of this nation; that would be transformer in chief Barack Obama. Obama has opened the floodgates to illegal immigrants with Muslim backgrounds.
It would certainly appear that Trump is channeling his inner "Art of the Deal" negotiation strategy, invoking the Overton Window theory regarding immigration in this country.
All illegal immigration needs to be immediately stopped, with the borders (north and south) being sealed. Although the president told us otherwise (liar in chief), US officials admit ISIS is planting operatives among the tens of thousand women, children and orphans invading our nation on a daily basis, which without question, poses significant national security issues.
The legal process of immigration, a process that is heartily welcomed and needed for the survival of our nation, must be promptly streamlined and redesigned to meet the myriad of new challenges the act presents. While there are significant measures to be enacted, and far reaching legalities to be considered, it is not a process that could not be tackled appropriately within 60 days.
Those who are already here who commit a felony crime will be immediately deported if found guilty be our legal process. A plan for those who entered illegally must be drawn up, which include penalties. We have laws, and those whose first act in stepping foot in our nation is to break the law must be assessed punitive penalties.
Many have cited Constitutional issues with Trump's outline for a plan. Call me crazy, but illegal immigrants are not protect by the US Constitution, as they have no legal rights. As of now, and not for the lack of effort by Obama, we are not an open society where all the world is entitled to the benefits of being an American citizen.
Many are very concerned about Trump supposedly insulting the Muslim community. I am far more offended about Obama insulting us, lecturing us repeatedly about how wonderful Islam and the people of that religion are.
Trump is playing everyone. But he is correct. We are at war, and it is beyond nonsensical to allow our nation to be invaded by illegal immigrants from nations that wish us harm, many who belong to a religion that deems us infidels and ultimately seek the establishment of a caliphate to ultimately rule the word. Their words, and the teachings of the Quran, say it is so.
Don't let the lamestream media trump you. Yes, shut the borders down immediately, and allow no more illegal immigration.
Sunday, December 6, 2015
The Exposing of the Enemy Within Begins
Is the United States fighting to defeat ISIS, the worldwide terror group inflicting immense pain and suffering around the world?
An excellent article over at Zero Hedge asks The Most Important Question About ISIS Nobody Is Asking.
Among foreign leaders, Turkish PM Erdogan is Obama's best buddy, and both support establishing a greater Syria, or caliphate, in the middle east, against established American interests.
Moscow has accused Turkey of being involved in ISIS's oil trade, and has presented evidence backing the accusations. This credible evidence, and evidence from outside observers of geopolitics and intentional markets suggests it is Turkey that is purchasing oil from ISIS, allowing it to gain strength and standing in the region. Make no mistake, Obama is fully aware of this and has no issue with it.
Turkey is making many moves in the region, moves that would not be tolerated without the US backing. The actions are generally against the common positions held by the US, but those positions are at lengthy odds from the direction placed into action by President Obama.
US officials noted the oil being smuggled in is "economically insignificant". "The State Department has dismissed Moscow's charge against its NATO ally, insisting there is no evidence to support it." However, an admission of the smuggling came from Amos Hochstein, U.S. special envoy and coordinator for international energy affairs. "The amount of oil being smuggled is extremely low and has decreased over time and is of no significance from a volume perspective - both volume of oil and volume of revenue," he said.
It is noted that the Muslim nations, and in particular those seeking to establish the caliphate, have a deep disdain for not only the western colonial powers, but Russia, who was a signatory of the Sykes-Picot Agreement.
What we have in a commander in chief; is an individual who seeks the degrading and transformation of America to a bit player, defines the USA as a country that must pay for its perceived sins as an oppressor and an individual seeking to advance the caliphate, where a Muslim country regains power similar to the days of the old Ottoman Empire. In short, it is reasonable to conclude, by his actions, our president is playing for the other team.
In September of 2014, we noted Obama was enabling enemies of state, arming terrorist organizations and helping to create the chaos necessary to fuel the flames of insurgency, all of which escalates the power Iran yields in the middle east. Obama is not delusional. His actions, assisting Iran in forming the caliphate, with ISIS free to do the necessary cleansing, are intentional and orchestrated.
President Obama has no intention of doing anything to significantly disrupt the activities of ISIS. In fact, it certainly appears Obama and the members of his administration are enemies within.
But, placing your opinion from what you may have read here or on other sites should be secondary to watching the actions of President Obama. They will tell you everything you need to know.
ISIS, which currently has France on edge after the ruthless and hideous attacks earlier this month in Paris and Brussels, home of NATO, on lock down and is killing "infidels" with lethal abandon, seems to be running roughshod across the globe, almost unabated.
Russia seems to be engaged in the fight, appearing to be forced into action after they had a passenger jet shot down about a month ago. Stop and give that a moment of thought; Russia had a passenger jet, with innocent citizens, shot down.
Vladamir Putin is not a good guy, and Russia, without question, has ulterior motives. Russia noted the turmoil being caused by the uprising in the middle east, and had taken action to increase it standing in the region. GOP presidential candidate Marco Rubio accurately pointed this out in an earlier GOP debate, and of course, Mitt Romney hit Obama with the news of Russia and their dangerous plans in a 2012 debate.
If we are indeed at war with the evil terrorist group ISIS, why has the Obama administration not thoroughly dismantled their main sourcing of finance; oil. Furthermore, who are the buyers of this oil, and what are their motivations behind helping to finance this evil band of terrorists? Evidence suggests it is reasonable to conclude Obama is playing for the other team, but who else, in terms of the financing, is joining him?
Among foreign leaders, Turkish PM Erdogan is Obama's best buddy, and both support establishing a greater Syria, or caliphate, in the middle east, against established American interests.
Moscow has accused Turkey of being involved in ISIS's oil trade, and has presented evidence backing the accusations. This credible evidence, and evidence from outside observers of geopolitics and intentional markets suggests it is Turkey that is purchasing oil from ISIS, allowing it to gain strength and standing in the region. Make no mistake, Obama is fully aware of this and has no issue with it.
Turkey is making many moves in the region, moves that would not be tolerated without the US backing. The actions are generally against the common positions held by the US, but those positions are at lengthy odds from the direction placed into action by President Obama.
US officials noted the oil being smuggled in is "economically insignificant". "The State Department has dismissed Moscow's charge against its NATO ally, insisting there is no evidence to support it." However, an admission of the smuggling came from Amos Hochstein, U.S. special envoy and coordinator for international energy affairs. "The amount of oil being smuggled is extremely low and has decreased over time and is of no significance from a volume perspective - both volume of oil and volume of revenue," he said.
It is noted that the Muslim nations, and in particular those seeking to establish the caliphate, have a deep disdain for not only the western colonial powers, but Russia, who was a signatory of the Sykes-Picot Agreement.
What we have in a commander in chief; is an individual who seeks the degrading and transformation of America to a bit player, defines the USA as a country that must pay for its perceived sins as an oppressor and an individual seeking to advance the caliphate, where a Muslim country regains power similar to the days of the old Ottoman Empire. In short, it is reasonable to conclude, by his actions, our president is playing for the other team.
In September of 2014, we noted Obama was enabling enemies of state, arming terrorist organizations and helping to create the chaos necessary to fuel the flames of insurgency, all of which escalates the power Iran yields in the middle east. Obama is not delusional. His actions, assisting Iran in forming the caliphate, with ISIS free to do the necessary cleansing, are intentional and orchestrated.
President Obama has no intention of doing anything to significantly disrupt the activities of ISIS. In fact, it certainly appears Obama and the members of his administration are enemies within.
But, placing your opinion from what you may have read here or on other sites should be secondary to watching the actions of President Obama. They will tell you everything you need to know.
Labels:
Barack Obama,
France,
Global War on Terror,
Iran,
ISIS,
Oil,
Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan,
Russia,
Sykes-Picot,
Turkey,
Vladimir Putin
Monday, November 30, 2015
France Top Target of ISIS
Written by Tom Olago and originally presented on Prophecy News Watch, we caught wind of the following excellent piece on this subject from over on the outstanding Black Quill & Ink blog:
By Tom Olago of Prophecy News Watch
The horror that unfolded in Paris last week, and the recent downing of a Russian airliner must have left many wondering: who will be next? Which city of ‘infidels’ and ‘crusaders’ will face the wrath of ISIS or some other terrorist group, hell-bent on shedding the blood of the innocent and leaving a long trail of destruction and pain in its wake?
No nation wants to be next, so heightened security alerts and measures are being hurriedly put into place, reactivated or enhanced all over the world, all in the hope of preventing terror attacks altogether, or minimizing the effects of any potentially successful ones.
Mali quickly discovered that it is almost impossible to know where the next terror attack is going to be as 21 people were killed after being taken hostage at the Radison Blu hotel by an Al Qaeda affiliate. Al Qaeda is looking to show that it is not to be forgotten in an effort to stay relevant in the ISIS onslaught. Belgium has gone on a high state of alert, which has included shutting down many parts of the city as it prepares to be next.
Many went into a panic over the weekend when reports surfaced that the online hacker group Anonymous had discovered information regarding planned terror attacks in Paris, the United States, Indonesia, Italy and Lebanon. Anonymous has since distanced itself from the report but it shows you how quickly disinformation or misinformation can propagate on the web and social media. We should expect a lot more of these types of false reports as people find themselves on edge which is exactly what Islamic terror groups are hoping.
One of the questions being asked is: why France? Some attacks conducted by Islamic Terrorists are clearly well planned and purposely chosen for symbolism such as the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon or the 7/7 bombings in London. Other attacks that are more "lone wolf" such as the Ft Hood shooting or the British soldier run down and beheaded in a London street in the middle of the afternoon are attacks of opportunity.
It is impossible to know where attacks of opportunity are going to arise but symbolic attacks take much more planning and it might be useful to examine the motivating factors behind the Paris onslaught for nations to examine their own history and policies that may make them a target.
A recent analysis by Elliot Friedland for the Clarion Project.org believes ISIS prioritizes which countries to attack, and when. He offers five top reasons that Paris, and France in general was singled out:
1. France has been fighting the Islamic State and other Islamists, and so far has been the only European country to join the air strikes with the U.S;
2. France has specifically named the Islamist ideology as the problem. They have stated that they are at war with radical Islam and have taken steps against other extremist groups;
3. France is standing up for its values and seeking to integrate Muslims. ISIS finds this unacceptable. The model proposed by Prime Minister Manuel Valls explicitly stated: “We seek to establish a model of Islam that is fully integrated, fully compatible with the values of the Republic.”
4. Paris represents the enlightenment values of Western civilization. ISIS derides Paris as “the capital of prostitution and vice, the lead carrier of the cross in Europe - Paris.”
5. The Islamic State is obsessed with history and honor. It carries a grudge with France over what it sees as historical injustices dating back to the 11th century, and now seeks to re-assert itself over Europe whilst taking the form the revived Muslim Caliphate.
None of the above are reasons that would resonate with civilized modern society, yet as usually happens, such attacks still tend to motivate other potential terrorists to launch their own offensives. They thrive on riding the publicity waves as far as possible, while media interest and social focus on terror is still at its highest.
Ryan Mauro of ClarionProject.org suggests that there are several ISIS threats that now loom large:
1. “Copycat" attacks by the Islamic State and other Islamist terrorist supporters, including those who are loyal to Al-Qaeda, who want to show that the group hasn't become a ‘has-been’ in the jihadist world - such as Mali.
2. There are those who will worry that they might now lose their chance to strike and earn their ticket to Paradise by dying in jihad as a "martyr." Supporters of the Islamic State have every reason to expect Western governments to become extra aggressive in rounding up possible terrorists. ISIS supporters who believe they are on the authorities' radar could choose to act sooner instead of patiently preparing their plot and risk being foiled, as suggested by the terror alert in Belgium.
Mauro believes that the recent attacks will earn ISIS a wave of recruits and encourage the millions of Islamic State supporters who have yet to take up arms finally to act upon their beliefs. The West will need to push back and counteract the ISIS propaganda scores, by persistently reminding ISIS and the world of the group’s failures, mistakes and acts of terror, all carried out in the name of Islam.
In a recent analysis published in Christian Headlines.com, Ayman S. Ibrahim states four ways that ISIS bases its acts of violence on religion, and why it matters:
1. ISIS based its actions on a literal reading of the Qur'an. It views itself as truly Islamic and claims its actions are supported by the Qur'an.
2. For ISIS followers, France is at war with Islam. The ISIS-issued statement that accepted responsibility for the attacks portrays France (and its allies) as Crusaders, literally “the holders of the Cross,” portraying the war in purely religious terms.
3. The attacks were meant to imitate seventh-century raids led by the Prophet Muhammad. The statement identified the Paris attacks using the Arabic term “ghazwa”, meaning ‘battle’. This term is said to have been primarily used in the biography of Muhammad, in reference to his raids and expeditions against the non-Muslims in the Arabian Peninsula in the seventh century.
4. The terrorists viewed themselves as martyrs for Islam. They died, the statement said, to support the cause of the true religion and in fulfillment of the charges of the Prophet Muhammad to humiliate enemies, rubbing “their noses in the dusty ground.”
Ayman concludes that to claim that all Muslims are terrorists is far from correct, but to deny or underestimate the significant power and influence of some Islamic texts and specific interpretations of them is not prudent, either.
Labels:
Crusades,
France,
Global War on Terror,
ISIS,
Radical Islam,
Russia,
Sykes-Picot,
Terrorism
Friday, November 27, 2015
A Real Turkey
Michael Ramirez/Investors Business Daily |
Given the subtle references, this is perhaps the most impressive work by Investors Business Daily brilliant editorial cartoonist Michael Ramirez in many a moon.
Obama is in fact a turkey, in more ways than one.
Obama has great affection for Turkey and their Prime Minister, Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan. As we have previously reported, our commander in chief is an individual who seeks the degrading and transformation of America to a bit player, defines the USA as a country that must pay for its perceived sins as an oppressor and an individual seeking to advance the caliphate, where a Muslim country regains power similar to the days of the old Ottoman Empire. In short, it is reasonable to conclude, by his actions, our president is playing for the other team. And on this team is in PM. ErdoÄŸan. Neither individual is the least bit concerned about the activities of ISIS, who they see as offer a necessary function in cleansing the territory from infidels.
Obama is an enemy within, hiding in plain sight, with America unable to see the forest from within the trees.
In Sept of 2014, we noted Obama was enabling enemies of state, arming terrorist organizations and helping to create the chaos necessary to fuel the flames of insurgency, all of which escalates the power Iran yields in the middle east. Obama is not delusional. His actions, assisting Iran in forming the caliphate, with ISIS free to do the necessary cleansing, are intentional and orchestrated.
A real Turkey indeed.
Tuesday, November 24, 2015
Directing The Masses
Donald J. Trump |
As outlined by GOP front runner Donald Trump, with all the terrorism acts being committed around the globe, the despicable and barbaric acts being engaged upon by Planned Parenthood and the corrupt actions and blatant disregard for the law being exhibited by the Obama administration and complicit members of Congress from both sides, the media feels compelled to scold Trump on his tone.
Can you imagine?
On the surface, you might conclude the news media is so stupid they would not know a story of legitimate impact on the citizenry if it took place in the lobby of their corporate office building. But no, nobody is that idiotic.
The mainstream news media is in full command of the facts. The stories they provide and the issues they cover are all part of an agenda to lead the American people in a direction they, in the arrogance of their intellectual elitism, determines is best determined to serve the ruling class.
Fans of dystopian writers George Orwell and Aldous Huxley often engage in debate who was more correct. Orwell considered the government would conceal information from the citizenry, and engage in rewriting the history the public was able to consume. Huxley imagined a world where the citizenry would be bombarded with voluminous information that would allow such consumption which would result in the citizenry being drunk on a sea of irrelevance.
George Orwell and Aldous Huxley photo/OpenCulture.com |
Both are accurate.
Truthful information is being concealed (gun running in Benghazi), and rewritten (see unemployment rate) as Orwell imagined and the country is ever increasingly engulfed by guilty pleasures (UFC fighting) and issues and individuals of non importance (the Kardashians) as Huxley forecasted.
Meanwhile, the freedoms we hold dear are being methodically taken from us though the orchestration of evil organizations, elected officials and social justice engineers of the ruling class. And of course, the mainstream media.
Friday, September 11, 2015
Have You Forgotten
![]() |
The World Trade Center |
Christians are being killed at alarming levels, yet our president continues to call out republicans for their evil attempts to adhere to the Constitution. We have officially become a nation of men; not laws.
And we have countless enemies within.
Have you forgotten?
Windows on the world
Evil spit in our face on the morning of September 11, 2001. As America sought comfort on this horrendous day, most found God watching over us. We had faith, which helped us through the incredible grief. With evil lurking all around us, we found love, courage and faith standing tall in the fire.

I have not forgotten. Never Forget! Political correctness be damned, we must remain committed to taking out evil wherever it exists, foreign or domestic.
GOD BLESS AMERICA
*PORTIONS REPRINTED FROM 9-11-11 BLOGPOST.
Wednesday, September 9, 2015
Tracking The Traitors
A gathering in Washington today voiced public opposition to the deal with Iran the Obama administration is championing, which is against the will of the people (70% are opposed) and the majority of the House and Senate.
The speakers at this event are folks BAHL Revere thinks very highly of. Among them were GOP presidential candidates Donald Trump and Sen. Ted Cruz, Sarah Palin, former congresswoman Michele Bachmann, Phil Robertson of Duck Dynasty, Glenn Beck, Mark Levin and Brigitte Gabriel.
Mark Levin, radio talk show host and constitutional scholar, hammered home the obvious regarding the deal, which will have drastic negative consequences across the globe.
“Never before has a President of the United States. Never before has a political party consented to funding and arming the enemy. Never before has a President entered into agreements with a terrorist regime that holds American hostages; that has killed and maimed thousands of American soldiers, and that seeks nuclear weapons and ICBMs (Inter-Continental Ballistic Missiles) to attack his own country,” said Levin. “Barack Obama makes Neville Chamberlain look like George S. Patton,” the former Reagan staffer added.
"The Democrat Party will have blood on their hands as a result of this deal for the rest of time. And let me be clear, this deal sows the seeds of war." Agreed.
This deal, negotiated from a position of weakness, is, as Sen. Ted Cruz said, catastrophic. In fact, it is an orchestrated effort from within to weaken American and strengthen those who describe themselves as our enemies. The deal would make Uncle Sam a top financier of global terrorism, essentially arming those who fight against our military. Let that sink into your thoughts for a moment.
If elected president, Ted Cruz reverse the deal on day one. Donald Trump would not eliminate the deal, but would drastically restructure the deal, which he terms as crafted by very stupid people.
I stand with Senator Cruz on this one. While Senator Cruz is well aware of the terrorists we are dealing with, Trump approaches it as a business deal. My appreciation of Trump's abilities in deal making (I read The Art of the Deal like most everyone else) is vast; however, I do not do deals with folks who are not trustworthy, particularly with nuclear weapons.
In addition, Trump should know the folks at the top crafting this deal are not stupid; far from it. These people are enemies within, people who view America as the problem and not the solution to the problem. They loathe the citizenry, and seek centralized power over the peasants they have to deal with. They view America as an oppressor, and seek to diminish her power through the transformation of wealth and by advancing opportunities to embolden her enemies.
This deal with Iran is such an opportunity. For Iran, it is the Deal of the Century.
Adding insult to injury, just for Obama's pleasure I am sure, the deal is to be vote on on September 11.
And as we have noted, Obama seeks to help facilitate the formation of a caliphate in the middle east, ushering in a Greater Syria, or a new Ottoman Empire, if you will. The pieces have been being placed for some time. This would include a Muslim nation with power rivaling that of any other nation, inclusive of the United States. ISIS is doing the cleansing, and Obama is not too concerned about that, evidenced by his putrid effort to stop the unspeakable violence and chaos these murderers are engaged in. It is noted Obama even allowed them to seize a large amount of our equipment, in the form of tanks, missile launchers and Humvees, inexplicably left in the region.
Glenn Beck has noted that we are at a crossroads. President Obama has chosen to stand with evil in Iran, against Israel, and against the will of the citizenry he governs.
The United States was placed in great peril with this deal, and future citizens will die due to this utterly despicable and irresponsible act by a brazen president acting outside or historical avenues of legislation. The Congress, which has allowed his reckless behavior, should also bear responsibility, and that certainly includes Speaker John Boehner and Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.
“Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to act is to act. Not to speak, is to speak"---Dietrich Bonhoeffer
Along with thousands of folks in DC today in spirit, I have spoken.
The speakers at this event are folks BAHL Revere thinks very highly of. Among them were GOP presidential candidates Donald Trump and Sen. Ted Cruz, Sarah Palin, former congresswoman Michele Bachmann, Phil Robertson of Duck Dynasty, Glenn Beck, Mark Levin and Brigitte Gabriel.
Mark Levin |
“Never before has a President of the United States. Never before has a political party consented to funding and arming the enemy. Never before has a President entered into agreements with a terrorist regime that holds American hostages; that has killed and maimed thousands of American soldiers, and that seeks nuclear weapons and ICBMs (Inter-Continental Ballistic Missiles) to attack his own country,” said Levin. “Barack Obama makes Neville Chamberlain look like George S. Patton,” the former Reagan staffer added.
"The Democrat Party will have blood on their hands as a result of this deal for the rest of time. And let me be clear, this deal sows the seeds of war." Agreed.
This deal, negotiated from a position of weakness, is, as Sen. Ted Cruz said, catastrophic. In fact, it is an orchestrated effort from within to weaken American and strengthen those who describe themselves as our enemies. The deal would make Uncle Sam a top financier of global terrorism, essentially arming those who fight against our military. Let that sink into your thoughts for a moment.
If elected president, Ted Cruz reverse the deal on day one. Donald Trump would not eliminate the deal, but would drastically restructure the deal, which he terms as crafted by very stupid people.
I stand with Senator Cruz on this one. While Senator Cruz is well aware of the terrorists we are dealing with, Trump approaches it as a business deal. My appreciation of Trump's abilities in deal making (I read The Art of the Deal like most everyone else) is vast; however, I do not do deals with folks who are not trustworthy, particularly with nuclear weapons.
In addition, Trump should know the folks at the top crafting this deal are not stupid; far from it. These people are enemies within, people who view America as the problem and not the solution to the problem. They loathe the citizenry, and seek centralized power over the peasants they have to deal with. They view America as an oppressor, and seek to diminish her power through the transformation of wealth and by advancing opportunities to embolden her enemies.
This deal with Iran is such an opportunity. For Iran, it is the Deal of the Century.
Adding insult to injury, just for Obama's pleasure I am sure, the deal is to be vote on on September 11.
And as we have noted, Obama seeks to help facilitate the formation of a caliphate in the middle east, ushering in a Greater Syria, or a new Ottoman Empire, if you will. The pieces have been being placed for some time. This would include a Muslim nation with power rivaling that of any other nation, inclusive of the United States. ISIS is doing the cleansing, and Obama is not too concerned about that, evidenced by his putrid effort to stop the unspeakable violence and chaos these murderers are engaged in. It is noted Obama even allowed them to seize a large amount of our equipment, in the form of tanks, missile launchers and Humvees, inexplicably left in the region.
Glenn Beck has noted that we are at a crossroads. President Obama has chosen to stand with evil in Iran, against Israel, and against the will of the citizenry he governs.
The United States was placed in great peril with this deal, and future citizens will die due to this utterly despicable and irresponsible act by a brazen president acting outside or historical avenues of legislation. The Congress, which has allowed his reckless behavior, should also bear responsibility, and that certainly includes Speaker John Boehner and Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.
“Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to act is to act. Not to speak, is to speak"---Dietrich Bonhoeffer
Along with thousands of folks in DC today in spirit, I have spoken.
Thursday, July 16, 2015
WARNING
The United States of America REMAINS under attack from radical Islamic terrorists worldwide.
Today, AGAIN, we are hit on our own shores as reportedly four US Marines were assassinated in Chattanooga, TN.
An attack on the US Military is an attack on America!
Sadly, our leadership not only appears to have little concern over these all too familiar attacks, they appear to be facilitating them.
President Obama and his team have embolden the terrorists and have done little to nothing to stop ISIS. In fact, with the recent agreement with Iran, the top nation sponsor of global terrorism, it can be said that Obama is assisting in financing the terrorists.
For crying out loud, President Obama still refuses to recognize who our enemy is.
America is under attack. It is time for those who normally do not engage in the political process to reduce the guilty pleasures of whatever program Ryan Seacrest is hosting on any given night and recognize the grim reality Uncle Sam is facing.
Time is short, and enemies are not only foreign, but domestic, hiding in plain sight. Open Your Eyes!
You are WARNED!
Today, AGAIN, we are hit on our own shores as reportedly four US Marines were assassinated in Chattanooga, TN.
An attack on the US Military is an attack on America!
Sadly, our leadership not only appears to have little concern over these all too familiar attacks, they appear to be facilitating them.
President Obama and his team have embolden the terrorists and have done little to nothing to stop ISIS. In fact, with the recent agreement with Iran, the top nation sponsor of global terrorism, it can be said that Obama is assisting in financing the terrorists.
Iran deal finances global terrorism |
America is under attack. It is time for those who normally do not engage in the political process to reduce the guilty pleasures of whatever program Ryan Seacrest is hosting on any given night and recognize the grim reality Uncle Sam is facing.
Time is short, and enemies are not only foreign, but domestic, hiding in plain sight. Open Your Eyes!
You are WARNED!
Labels:
Barack Obama,
Buck Sexton,
Global War on Terror,
ISIS,
Marines,
Ryan Seacrest,
US Military
Monday, July 6, 2015
Progressives Use LGBT Movement to Control Citizenry
With ISIS running roughshod and terror in the air, and with an economy that looks fair with manipulated data but is incredibly fragile and on the brink of collapse, in recent weeks, issues surrounding those not heterosexual have dominated the news. With age old common law and Christian values whipsawed from every angle, many of us feel we're climbing through the pages of Dr. Seuss's Inside Outside Upside Down.
The reasons for this embrace of the LGBT movement are plentiful; however, most notably,progressive activists in the United States want to use these kinds of laws to destroy free speech in America. Hate speech is defined as speech that offends, threatens or insults groups, based on race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, disability, or other traits. There you have it, if your religion finds homosexuality offensive, and you think that, you have no doubt offended somebody, and this day and age, that somebody could force your incarceration.
I'll go ahead an offend someone, as I believe marriage is between a man and a woman, with same sex couples free to seek civil unions, allowing them equal rights under the law but not necessarily in the church.
Moving forward now, all legal forms must be altered, and for students filling out forms it will move to parent name rather than the name of the mother and father, diminishing the value of the traditional family. If churches fail to embrace the LGBT crowd, from performing marriages to hiring staff, even if this goes against traditional beliefs of the church, the churches risk losing their tax exempt status. Calls for the stripping of the tax exempt status have already begun.
Christian churches are officially under attack now, and will be set up to be in violation; however, you will not see such effort being made at any mosques. Islam is being championed; left alone, however, Christianity is deemed unworthy by these elites as traditional America must be discredited and destroyed for the new socialist utopia of one world governance to take root.
Hate speech can fly vigorously aimed at those who don't share admiration for the LGBT community, with labels of bigotry and racism tossed about with little ramification. Free speech will be punished in the court of public affairs if it is deemed inappropriate by the wizards of doublespeak.
If you own a private company, you will be declared ineligible for consideration for government contracts or dealings with government agencies if you are deemed to profess discrimination against the gay community, or for that matter, illegal immigrants.
If it were only gay marriage, that might be one thing.
However, the issue is never the issue with the left, and the floodgates of rewriting common law and destroying valued traditions with escalating government control is running roughshod, issuing punitive damage to those who dissent.
The LGBT crowd are useful idiots, utilized as a political mechanism by the progressive movement to gain control over the citizenry. With the help of a rogue Supreme Court who deems themselves able to operate outside of the Constitution, these doors have just been kicked wide open.
There have been attacks on bakeries, who due to their religious faith appropriately determined they would be unable to make a cake for a gay wedding. A similar issue arose for a pizza parlor in the middle of nowhere that got attacked from all points across the globe. Quite a disturbance for such a limited amount of people.
Then, there is the sad tale of former Olympian champion Bruce Jenner, who has determined he is actually a woman and has begun making his transition, now referred to as Caitlyn. I think he has major psychological issues, but I hope he finds peace.
These issues have not come to the forefront by accident. Nobody was shocked the media was poised to promptly react as each of these issues became public knowledge. Obama did not read about it in the news.
In fact, I deem the whole thing orchestrated.
I recall something I found interesting while watching the Celebrity Apprentice in 2012, noting that a disproportional amount of the charities designated by the contestants were associated with some arm of the LGBT movement. We posted here on BAHL Revere about this the time.
Vice President Joe Biden supposedly misspoke regarding Obama being a supporter of gay marriage, but that was not the case, simply presented that was to open the door for Obama, no doubt a man of principle, to change course once the wind changed direction allowing political expediency. Same with Hillary Clinton, who for decades stood tall for marriage between a man and woman, citing it as a "bedrock principle".
These folks are liars. They do not give a damn about gay people, although seemingly non-credible reports indicated both may be bisexual. Both Obama and Clinton are using the LGBT movement, which again, represents approximately five percent of the population with a full stretch of the figures, to further their political ambitions.
And now, with the Supreme Court recently ruling in favor of same sex marriage, the slippery slope begins a frantic struggle for friction.
As famed economist and Hoover Institution Senior Fellow Thomas Sowell so eloquently stated recently stated in the supreme editorial pages of Investors Business Daily, "When any branch of government can exercise powers not authorized by either statutes or the Constitution, "we the people" are no longer free citizens but subjects, and our "public servants" are really our public masters. And America is no longer America. The freedom for which whole generations of Americans have fought and died is gradually but increasingly being taken away from us with smooth and slippery words".
And now, with the Supreme Court recently ruling in favor of same sex marriage, the slippery slope begins a frantic struggle for friction.
As famed economist and Hoover Institution Senior Fellow Thomas Sowell so eloquently stated recently stated in the supreme editorial pages of Investors Business Daily, "When any branch of government can exercise powers not authorized by either statutes or the Constitution, "we the people" are no longer free citizens but subjects, and our "public servants" are really our public masters. And America is no longer America. The freedom for which whole generations of Americans have fought and died is gradually but increasingly being taken away from us with smooth and slippery words".
The reasons for this embrace of the LGBT movement are plentiful; however, most notably,progressive activists in the United States want to use these kinds of laws to destroy free speech in America. Hate speech is defined as speech that offends, threatens or insults groups, based on race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, disability, or other traits. There you have it, if your religion finds homosexuality offensive, and you think that, you have no doubt offended somebody, and this day and age, that somebody could force your incarceration.
I'll go ahead an offend someone, as I believe marriage is between a man and a woman, with same sex couples free to seek civil unions, allowing them equal rights under the law but not necessarily in the church.
Moving forward now, all legal forms must be altered, and for students filling out forms it will move to parent name rather than the name of the mother and father, diminishing the value of the traditional family. If churches fail to embrace the LGBT crowd, from performing marriages to hiring staff, even if this goes against traditional beliefs of the church, the churches risk losing their tax exempt status. Calls for the stripping of the tax exempt status have already begun.
Christian churches are officially under attack now, and will be set up to be in violation; however, you will not see such effort being made at any mosques. Islam is being championed; left alone, however, Christianity is deemed unworthy by these elites as traditional America must be discredited and destroyed for the new socialist utopia of one world governance to take root.
Hate speech can fly vigorously aimed at those who don't share admiration for the LGBT community, with labels of bigotry and racism tossed about with little ramification. Free speech will be punished in the court of public affairs if it is deemed inappropriate by the wizards of doublespeak.
If you own a private company, you will be declared ineligible for consideration for government contracts or dealings with government agencies if you are deemed to profess discrimination against the gay community, or for that matter, illegal immigrants.
If it were only gay marriage, that might be one thing.
However, the issue is never the issue with the left, and the floodgates of rewriting common law and destroying valued traditions with escalating government control is running roughshod, issuing punitive damage to those who dissent.
The LGBT crowd are useful idiots, utilized as a political mechanism by the progressive movement to gain control over the citizenry. With the help of a rogue Supreme Court who deems themselves able to operate outside of the Constitution, these doors have just been kicked wide open.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)