As The Federalist's David Harsanyi accurately notes,"His life isn’t only idealized by Communists or Cuban tyrants, but by old-fashioned American liberals who have a longstanding practice of whitewashing socialist history. No one was ever made less poor by Che's revolutions. Only less alive."
"It amounts to exploiting our children, as well as those 17 deaths in Florida, for political purposes."
There is no question about it. Ferguson, Baltimore, and sadly Orlando are all examples where the organized radical left has organized in breathtaking fashion to advocate for an agenda which attacks the founding principles of our nation, sadly exploiting the uneducated "useful idiots" in the process.
In Orlando, the Pulse shooting massacre was not chosen as a vehicle to advance gun control, but rather to push the LGBT agenda. With the help of media partners and a very vocal minority, it has worked like a charm, as Orlando has become a leading gay community. (we don't have an issue with that, only the way it was seemingly forced upon us local residents rather than organically growing).
In fact, in the trial of the gunman's wife, which started this week, The Orlando Sentinel reports that federal prosecutors of Noor Salman considered the attack at Pulse on June 12,2016 was a terrorist act, not a gay club attack. While the media would never agree, we deem this assessment compete accurate.
These well organized groups of the radical left are making great progress, and our nation is paying a heavy price.
One has to wonder how many of our children, who while with heavy hearts wanted to pay tribute to the beautiful souls who were lost on Valentines Day in south Florida, were heavy influenced by the lies presented to them by these dishonest agents of those who aim to change the principles this nation was founded upon.
Perhaps a better course of action today would have been to adopt the words expressed on this wonderful sign making it's way through social media today:
Due to the actions of the brass at Missouri, they have this coming in spades.
As the Daily Caller reports, "The image problems stem from an eruption of Black Lives Matter protests rocked the Columbia, Mo. campus in November 2015. The protests by a group calling itself Concerned Student 1950 group centered largely on Jonathan Butler, the son of a millionaire railroad executive. Butler went on a hunger strike and convinced 32 black Mizzou football players to boycott all team activities."
America was not impressed, and most consider Black Lives Matter a borderline terrorist organization.
“Black Lives Matter hates the American system of government, i.e., the Constitution and capitalism,” says Rev. Jesse Lee Patterson, founder and president of the civil-rights organization BOND. Patterson says the movement associates the U.S. with “whiteness,” and, therefore, despises the very government that appears to be endorsing it.
We noted at the time the University of Missouri was in trouble, mainly for how they appeasing Black Lives Matter, a social justice movement. This highly financed group is part of the agenda created to discredit churches, companies, agencies and organizations while creating divisions between classes through race, gender and economic status.
The New York Times notes a Mizzou journalism professor said "The protests could have been turned into an asset — a chance to celebrate diversity. “We still can.”
It seems to me that mindset remains steadfast in appeasement, not connecting with the values of most of America, and certainly from the heartland.
Mizzou should celebrate the chasing of dreams of their students through individualism and teamwork, not orchestrated diversity.
Appearing to be on the run, Noor Salman, wife of Omar Mateen, who killed 49 people and wounded 53 others on June 12 at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, was arrested in San Francisco on January 16.
Why she was ever allowed to roam free was puzzling, but now we may know.
President Obama, in campaigning for Hillary Clinton, was quick to point out (incorrectly) that there had not been a terrorist act in America under his watch. The media never challenged Obama, and went overboard to describe the Pulse shooting as a hate crime; an action against the LGBTQ community.
After her arrest, Salman was charged with "Aiding and Abetting by providing material support to a foreign terrorist organization and Obstruction of Justice."
So, let the record reflect the authorities DO consider the Pulse shooting an act of terrorism by a foreign terrorist organization.
Therefore, beyond spreading "fake news", Obama allowed an accomplice to a horrifying and despicable act of terrorism to roam free for political expediency, potentially placing citizens in harms way.
That is disgusting, if not criminal, action by Obama, but we should not forget he does appear to have an allegiance to some who wish America harm.
As President Obama continues to free hundreds of convicted felons, many of them terrorists, not to mention ad individual who committed treason against the United States, if is worth comparing this action with that of a true American Patriot.
Although in his own mind Obama thinks of his presidency as being among the greatest our nation has had, it is far from it.
Among the many measuring arenas we can engage, perhaps the pardons and commutations at the end or a term is most telling.
It is often said that one mans terrorist is another man's freedom fighter, and I would deem that true.
So, we can compare Abraham Lincoln with Barack Obama under that metric.
One freed American slaves (for which he paid the ultimate price) and one freed terrorists.
We have been wondering about the whereabouts of the wife of the Orlando mass murderer Omar Mateen.
I drove by the Pulse Nightclub, the scene of the horrific, event this morning. It still hurts.
However, Orlando is picking up the pieces very nicely, and I am very proud of our community.
Although without question they were significantly impacted, there appears to be an overreach to the LGBT community. We disagree that the terrorist act was planned and plotted as an attack on the LGBT community, as we consider the event a terrorist act against The United States of America which took the lives of many of our beloved citizens, most of whom in this case, were LGBT and/or Latino.
The New York Times has located Noor Salman, and has presented a story attempting to make us sympathetic to her plight as the loved one who had no clue about the evil her husband was about to inflict.
I don't buy it for one minute.
“It’s possible she didn’t know because he was not confiding in her, but she does have every incentive in the world to retell this story as a different kind of victim,” said Mia Bloom, a professor at Georgia State University. “I am not trying to minimize the experience she had in a domestic abusive relationship, but it doesn’t give her a free pass as a bystander to not come forward.”
The "I was unaware" excuse has run it's course. They all know.
She should be considered an accomplice, and charged accordingly.
The European Union is a complete failure, a form of new communism that abolishes nation states by stealing the sovereignty of its members and allowing un-elected bureaucrats to seize control over peoples lives.
Under the EU, members nations are facing financial collapse and are being run over by immigrants engaged in terrorism, all an assault on the European standard of living.
Nigel Farage warned us long ago, "It's even more serious than economics because if you rob people of their identity, if you rob them of their democracy, then all they are left with is nationalism and violence. I can only hope and pray that the Euro project is destroyed by the markets before that."
Perhaps that time has come, as with the passage of Brexit, June 23 just may be a new Independence Day.
Perhaps you just concluded watching "The Five" on Fox News Channel co-hosted by the lovely Kimberly Guilfoyle, but a depressing and deadly accurate article by Greg Gutfeld now requires your eyeballs.
"How can America defeat ISIS if we have vocal factions believing that we are worse? How can we fight the enemy if a large portion of our population thinks an inanimate object – a gun – caused Orlando?"
Damn good question.
Gutfeld: Orlando’s doom. The most depressing article you will ever share. Share it anyway by Greg Gutfeld
We will do just that!
The immediate consequences from the Orlando terror attack are obvious: dozens dead and maimed – families changed forever. The next layer of consequences, arriving soon, are not as obvious, but they are coming. Here they are: We are getting a divorce. First, a poll shows that Americans are pretty much divided on their opinions about the attack. Most of the Democrats see it as a gun control issue. Most Republicans see it as a terror attack. And there seems to be no sign of compromise (why can’t it be mostly “terror” and a little “guns?” asks the therapist, Dr. Gutfeld) This poll hints at an ongoing, disturbing change in this country – one that brings forth a series of even more problems – those of which I see as almost unsolvable. We quarrel about the quarrel. We cannot agree on the fight. And therefore we cannot begin to fight. Instead, we are like that proverbial snake that devours its own tail. Except, we think it’s sushi. But it’s blowfish. You get the idea. We’re dead.
"How can America defeat ISIS if we have vocal factions believing that we are worse? How can we fight the enemy if a large portion of our population thinks an inanimate object – a gun – caused Orlando?"
We assume different identities lead to different values. Does a black person, or a gay person or a fat white male, see a terror attack differently? I wouldn’t think so, but activists, talking heads and assorted thought-processors disagree. Now we no longer look at a tragedy as an American one, but through the divisive eyes of balkanized camps of competing identities. An activist at the University of Missouri, during a vigil for the victims of Orlando, actually expressed disappointment that she had to speak in front of grievers, who happened by birth, to be white. My only relief comes from the fact that a few people heckled her (a brave gay couple). That relief left when others drowned them out. The beat-down is dead. We need to train our populace on the basics of group self-defense – meaning how to cooperate and risk their skins to take down the lone aggressor. If ten people attack a man with a gun, one or two may die – but the alternative is worse. “Be Like 93” should be the motto – in honor of the heroic actions of the passengers of Flight 93, who saved uncountable lives on September 11, 2001 by attacking the hijackers and bringing the jet down in a Pennsylvania field. But that’s not what I’m really talking about. I mean justifiable aggression: explicitly meting out justice to those who deserve it. How can we do that, when we cannot agree who deserves it? The New York Times blamed Republicans for Orlando. The Huffington Post blamed Christians. Every liberal blames guns, as well as the complicit wife of the murderous, terrorist dirtbag. And the dirtbag’s dad blames social networks. He’s even suing them. The more we spread the condemnations around, the less we have for the truly guilty party. Hence our incremental approach to ISIS. President Obama treats the war on “terror” (a polite phrase for Islamism), like we’re playing Jenga. Slowly, and on rainy days. We lose respect for evidence. Our inability to call a spade a spade is the result of divorcing cause from effect. If we can’t call Islamism out for this horribleness, then what’s left? Blame Guns. Christians. White Zinfindal. It’s as though you blame a massive wild fire not on dry tinder and a lit cigarette, but on poor self-esteem among carbon products. Here’s science: Islamism preaches the murder of gays; then an Islamist murders a club full of gays. Cause…effect. Why does the left deny science? The way the media and our White House deny the effects of Islamism seems eerily similar to a certain industry we grew to loathe over time. Remember how the tobacco companies denied the role of their product in lung cancer? To deny that link, now, would have you laughed off the planet. My prediction: 20 years from now we will feel the same way about Islamism. “Remember when we had a president who refused to admit the link between atrocity and Islamism” will be the same as “Remember when people used to say cigarettes didn’t cause cancer.” Refusing to link Islamism to evil is denying the evidence before your objective eyes.
You don’t even need to bring up Orlando. Try honor killings. Read up on the Taliban and what they do to girls who want to go to school. Google “Taliban” and “acid.” President Obama isn’t just on the wrong side of history, he’s on the wrong side of the future. For a guy who claims to be all about science, he lives in a fairy tale. We have murdered sympathy. A product of modern leftism’s regressive identity politics: we see victimhood as a zero-sum game. If you grieve for the victims of terror, is there any left for Black Lives Matter? If you light a candle for Orlando, why not for Ferguson? If you aren’t gay, how are you able to sympathize with gay victims of terror? What if you’re against gay marriage? Are you as evil as terrorists? Perhaps, some might say (or have said). One anchor at another network actually chided a sympathizing politician, in the state where the terror took place… because she did not support gay rights enough to his satisfaction. I was bummed he’d play bouncer to the “Who gets to grieve” night club. That’s beneath him. Obama was against gay marriage just a handful of years ago, my friend. Now sympathy is saddled with considerations for approval of other groups and classes. Maybe just keep quiet instead of expressing sympathy, one might conclude.
We have killed debate. To better enhance well-being, one must be able to argue and even allow oneself to be proven wrong. Science is all about that: prove me wrong, please. Now, no one wants to be wrong, even when it’s an abstract debate. Look, I think the gun control debate is a deflection from the core concern, which is terror. But I’m willing to listen to some common sense, or at least informed opinions on how to prevent terrorists from getting guns. Sadly, the gun control argument is a misleading one: used not to ban guns (we know it ain’t happening), but to drive the debate away from the more volatile issue, which Islamism’s universal plans. And! – wouldn’t it be nice to talk about gun control with people who actually knew something about guns? Or control? If Orlando had been done not by gun, but by bomb -- where would the left’s argument be? Where it was, after Boston. Nowhere. We have disabled our impulse control. My motto has always been: your first public thought is often your worst public thought. Meaning: think before unloading. We now know that this is an impossible wish in this current climate of Twitter, Facebook and Piers Morgan. What happened to reserve? Contemplation? Thoughtfulness? What about waiting a few days before you spout an opinion? Now every celebrity and their less famous sibling is on Twitter lecturing us on “assault weapons” and “tolerance” as if the world right now really needs a hot take from a sitcom star on his third bout of chlamydia. The strong and silent type has been replaced with the weak and loud. I’d include myself in this, except that I only speak when spoken to. Otherwise, I sit quietly in a corner and drink copious amounts of wine. We no longer cooperate. This sad and sober consequence is the result of combining all the results mentioned above together. Without cooperation, society is doomed. Cooperation contributes to better lives, over all. If what’s good for you, is good for them you help them get what you have. That’s not the case in this era of moral relativism. The problem is: we no longer believe that what we have is good. How can America defeat ISIS if we have vocal factions believing that we are worse? How can we fight the enemy if a large portion of our population thinks an inanimate object – a gun – caused Orlando? And not this pernicious ideology you can’t even call a death cult, because radical Islam is worse than that? It’s a death movement. A death phenomenon. It’s a force that sees our conscious lives as inferior to what happens after you die. Which is why, for them, killing gays is an act of love. They’re doing those sinners a favor – in their twisted skulls, killing innocents in a night club just gave the murdered a Fast Pass to Nirvana. Boy, this is a depressing article. And I wrote it. Read it and weep.
For the victims. For the country. For your family. For you and me.
In the aftermath of the horrific terrorist attack in the SODO district of downtown Orlando, like clockwork, the left has unleashed an well coordinated and financed attack, not on those responsible for the attack, but on law abiding citizens of this nation.
Imagine the arrogance of this crowd, who immediately take their progressive ideology of government knows best to making tracks to steal your rights outlined for you in our Constitution away from you?
It is not just them.
Progressive republicans are sadly all too willing to join the fight.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
What part of this do these progressive elites not comprehend?
And for those who scoff at the idea the citizenry may at some point have to defend ourselves against a tyrannical government, they identify themselves as illiterate in history.
Sen. Ted Cruz took to the floor of the Senate to call these folks out.
Cruz accurately summed it up in a Tweet.
Forget that the progressive left has no right to infringe on the rights of the citizenry bestowed upon them in the Constitution, we are at war.
Ask anyone at Pulse; the government will fall far short in their efforts to protect you. When it comes to crisis
management amidst a terror attack, you must protect yourself.
And against these ISIS fighters, that will be mighty tough to do after your government has disarmed you.
In a despicable display of partisanship, Anderson Cooper flew the coop attacking Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi about her actions opposing gay marriage in Florida.
Cooper, who is highly regarded for his journalistic integrity among the media elites and even by some on the right, including firebrand conservative Glenn Beck, is being applauded by progressives, liberals and the LGBT community for his blindside of Bondi.
I have always considered Cooper among the very best of the national mainstream media, which can no doubt be considered strongly left leaning. But I found his attack on Bondi nothing short of strongly offensive.
The LGBT community, which includes Cooper, is miffed with Bondi for her opposition of the legalization of gay marriage. Bondi was acting on behalf of the state of Florida (I am a resident of the Sunshine State) in leading the opposition, as her job having been elected dictates. As she pointed out, the majority of the residents of Florida are against the measure, as am I.
That does not in any way suggest she, or any of the other Floridians against that initiative, hate the LGBT community. We do not. We just happen to believe marriage is between a man and woman, as our Christian beliefs dictate. Certainly, the greater majority are in favor of a civil union which would allow for loved ones to have legal standing, contrary to Copper's suggestion otherwise.
Incidentally, this is a position recently held by both President Obama and Hillary Clinton until it became politically expedient to change positions, with Clinton calling it a "sacred bond" and a "bedrock principle."
At any rate, as common sense would suggest, this was not an appropriate time to address this issue with AG Bondi. Unless your manners and professionalism took a back seat to your personal agenda. They did with Cooper, and my respect for him immediately flew the coop.
In a rather stunning speech Tuesday, a petulant Obama hunkered down in defense of Islam essentially blaming America for the grotesque loss of life in Orlando. Obama took a shot at Donald Trump, as did Hillary in a follow up speech.
But it is Trump who has accurately assessed the real issue, radical Islamic terrorists, and make no mistake, it is the left, led by these two anti-American elites, and their policies, that are in large measure to blame for this terrorism.
"Perhaps it is those who preach tolerance that we should be most afraid of. Democrats and liberals preach tolerance. But in doing so they have chosen to ignore the dark truths of a religion which is the most intolerant of all" noted Hopkins.
Agreed.
Cooper, and his progressive partners in the media, do not seem to have any anger whatsoever against radical Islam and the destruction that surrounds them. No, they take aim, with fervor, attacking opponents of the LGBT cause, which is dear to them.
The safety of the citizens of America, all of them, are dear to me.
If only Anderson Cooper would extend such efforts calling out those who are looking the other way as terrorists murder our citizens rather than taking this opportunity to advocate on behalf of the LGBT agenda.
Maybe he could have waited until we bury our neighbors categorized not as LGBT or Latino unless it is an agenda item for you, but as fellow Americans, before engaging AG Bondi?
Evil are these terrorists, not AG Bondi, and this was without question a terrorist attack on all of us.
When will the leftists ever learn. As Hopkins accurately notes, they may never.
"One name continues to surface as a trusted Trump adviser and go-to man on intelligence and national security: Retired Army Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, a well-known and outspoken critic of the Obama administration’s campaign against ISIS and its foreign policy" reports The Daily Beast.
EXCELLENT!
Gen. Flynn has been doing everything he can to warn the American public about the degree of danger this nation is in, from enemies foreign, and domestic.
You are being warned!
Back in January, in an interview with Megyn Kelly of FOX News, retired Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, speaking between the lines, is doing everything he can to warn you the level of peril the US is in under our "enemy within" president.
High ranking members of the military, even those who are retired, must choose their words very carefully, as words matter. However, it is obvious Lieutenant General Flynn had a message for America he was compelled to give.
The government fight against Apple (AAPL:NASDAQ) regarding the San Bernardino terrorist case is much more significant than a quick glance would indicate.
In fact, "The San Bernardino fight didn’t come out of nowhere. The government thought it could use a terrorism case to set a precedent to get whatever it wants going forward.
Fortunately, Tim Cook said enough is enough and very publicly took his case to the people." Our government is flat out of control. I am not an Apple user and do not generally agree with Apple CEO Tim Cook on political and social issues, but I stand in firm support of Cook and Apple in this case. This case is not about catching terrorists, it is using terror as a mechanism to gain further control of the America people.
If Apple loses here, American privacy and liberties will be lost as well.
"While you were following the snowstorm, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R:KY) was busy preparing the way for a proposal". “This resolution is a total rewrite of the War Powers Clause in the U.S. Constitution,” said Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CN). “It is essentially a declaration of international martial law, a sweeping transfer of military power to the president that will allow him or her to send U.S. troops almost anywhere in the world, for almost any reason, with absolutely no limitations.” "AUMF, written by Sen. Lindsey Graham, (R:SC), is packaged as a proposal to fight the Islamic State group — but it would also allow the president to deploy military forces anywhere he chooses and for as long as he wants" wrote Voice of Reason.
Obama can kick the ass of ISIS any hour he decides, but continues to choose not to.
Obama is interested in punishing his domestic enemies, and VP Biden has previously described Tea Party members as terrorists. What you consider terrorists are freedom fighters to Obama. Who would be considered terrorists should civil unrest occur after an economic collapse?
No matter.
No President should be given unlimited war powers, and those who effort to operate outside the Constitution should be considered enemies of our nation.
“Ignorance kills. In war, ignorance brings defeat, especially for those who are sworn to support and defend us,” writes Stephen Coughlin in his latest book Catastrophic Failure: Blindfolding America in the Face of Jihad.
If only ignorance was the issue.
"We are at war and it’s time we as a nation orient our strategy to reflect it" concluded Nick Short.
Instead, the Obama administration is in full command of the facts and is complicit in placing America in great peril. Those who we deem terrorists the administration views as freedom fighters against an oppressive nation, a nation the Obama regime is working drastically to transform.
Diminishing America while emboldening and legitimizing our enemies, or those Obama thinks the United States has oppressed in the past.
While logic, based upon his own actions, can conclude President Obama is sadly an enemy within, it is still important for the citizenry to clearly understand the enemies we face. The excellent piece linked below from Nick Short of Politically Short does just that.
The affection for Iran, the top sponsor of terrorism in the world, runs deep within the Obama administration.
When contemplating the actions, including but not limited to the orchestrated invasion of our borders, the backing of the establishment of the caliphate, the abrasive treatment of Israel and perhaps most notably the recent treasonous agreement with the Ayatollahs, it would be very difficult, if not impossible, to arrive at any other conclusion than the Obama administration are without question enemies within the United States.
It appears the light bulb in the head of Bill O'Reilly, who hosts The O'Reilly Factor on FOX News Channel, has finally gone off! Welcome Bill! It is great to have you recognize what most of us have known for quite some time.
The progressive left, in large measure led by the Obama administration, have many avenues of attack in their effort to transform the United States of America, and an open borders policy bringing illegal aliens into this country without congressional approval and against the will of the people is chief among them.
O'Reilly has had enough:
Regrettably, the invasion of illegal immigrants has been going on for quite some time; a number of years actually. But it is within the past 18 months of so it has really gotten the attention of the nation.
O'Reilly is steamed over his proposal of Kates Law, and rightfully so. O'Reilly became involved after the senseless murder of a beautiful young woman, Kate Steinle. The law O'Reilly is behind is really common sense, with provisions you would think everyone could get behind.
But, not when you are speaking about the progressive left, who champion open borders as part of their dream of transforming America, even if young American citizens are murdered in cold blood on the seemingly safe streets of a cosmopolitan city like San Francisco.
The left views America as an oppressive nation, and feel our prosperity is ill-gotten, having taken advantage of nations across the globe and leaving them impoverished and lacking in the levels of prosperity and advancement the United States has achieved.
Not to diminish the death of Ms.Steinle, but the ramifications of the invasion of our nation by illegal immigrants are much more far reaching, and extremely dangerous.
We noted last year the tens of thousands of illegal immigrants that seemingly out of nowhere began invading our southern border. While this was presented as a rare confluence of events that brought all these folks to converge on our southern border, it was in fact an orchestrated event with full knowledge and blessings of the Obama administration.
Beyond the events on the southern border last year, without congressional approval, for some time President Obama has been bring illegal immigrants to America. In fact, The Independent Sentinel reports the following:
Videos and other reports have been popping up on the Internet claiming the federal government is sneaking in thousands of refugees in the dead of night and liberal activists who run fact checking organizations like snipes say it’s not true. However, we now have a sheriff’s constable swearing it is true. UPS is bringing refugees in on their flights in the middle of the night, according to a Marcus Kohan, a PA constable. We have no idea who they are and if they have been screened. Americans’ representatives in Congress are supposed to be deciding who comes into the country and how many come in, not a dictator in the White House and the government officials he pays off with tax dollars, and if this is true, he should be impeached.
When we first saw the story from The Independent Sentinel, we filed it away and waited for some sort of confirmation. That confirmation came in a report from FOX News, that stated "A proposal to admit 10,000 Syrian refugees to the United States has ignited a bitter debate in Washington, but more than 10 times that number of people from the embattled country have quietly come to America since 2012, according to figures obtained by FOXNews.com."
We recognized Obama sought the influx of illegal immigrants to make America as non-colonialist as possible, transferring wealth to the refugees and bloat the democratic voter rolls. Very troubling reports of his social engineering objectives centering around the diversity of neighborhoods. They are tied together, as former Florida congressman Allen West reports.
They need the fundamental demographic change of America in order to maintain their hold on power. This HUD rule will certainly be aimed at communities where the voting demographic does not favor the left. If they’re successful in this endeavor, then “Katy bar the door.”
As The American Legislator reports:
One of the most egregious items is the new Housing and Urban Development (HUD) rules on housing, called the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH), which will strip away local control of planning and development across the country. In brief, HUD’s new rule forces local governments to accept the federal government’s plans of how any new housing developments will incorporate low income housing regardless of location or access to public transportation. If the AFFH ruling is passed, it will take away the most fundamental role of local governments in regards to land use, zoning and urban planning.
While Obama gleefully admires himself for making good on his promise to transform the United States, I am not sure even he thought the influx of immigrants would start killing us.
They are.
Among the refugees entering our nation are embedded members of ISIS. They are here. Attacks similar to the one that occurred in San Bernardino will take place again in the future, and likely soon.
Based upon Obama continuing to release prisoners and empty our jails and taking little to no action to attack the terrorists murdering our citizens while lecturing us and threatening to circumvent the second amendment to go after our guns, it is more than reasonable to conclude he is not particularly concerned about it.
It is all part of the plan of Obama. The plan includes the rise of an Islamic and Muslim nation in the middle east with a caliphate established, and the diminishing of America on the world stage. President Obama does not consider himself an American, rather a global citizen who happens to make his home in America.
I suspect Obama is thrilled at the success he is having in transforming this nation, without any significant brush back from the Congress. The plot to destroy America as we have known her from within is working with imagined success. It is truly stunning, and most dangerous.
France has been a target of the Islamic State as far back as the Crusades, exacerbated in recent times by the collapse of expected negotiations of territory in the aftermath of the Sykes-Picot Agreement of 1916, of which, interestingly enough, Russia, was a party. "The Islamic State is obsessed with history and honor. It carries a grudge with France over what it sees as historical injustices dating back to the 11th century" noted Tom Olago. When ISIS says they will conquer Rome, they are referring to Paris. Therefore, expect ISIS attacks on Paris to continue.
By Tom Olago of Prophecy News Watch The horror that unfolded in Paris last week, and the recent downing of a Russian airliner must have left many wondering: who will be next? Which city of ‘infidels’ and ‘crusaders’ will face the wrath of ISIS or some other terrorist group, hell-bent on shedding the blood of the innocent and leaving a long trail of destruction and pain in its wake? No nation wants to be next, so heightened security alerts and measures are being hurriedly put into place, reactivated or enhanced all over the world, all in the hope of preventing terror attacks altogether, or minimizing the effects of any potentially successful ones. Mali quickly discovered that it is almost impossible to know where the next terror attack is going to be as 21 people were killed after being taken hostage at the Radison Blu hotel by an Al Qaeda affiliate. Al Qaeda is looking to show that it is not to be forgotten in an effort to stay relevant in the ISIS onslaught. Belgium has gone on a high state of alert, which has included shutting down many parts of the city as it prepares to be next. Many went into a panic over the weekend when reports surfaced that the online hacker group Anonymous had discovered information regarding planned terror attacks in Paris, the United States, Indonesia, Italy and Lebanon. Anonymous has since distanced itself from the report but it shows you how quickly disinformation or misinformation can propagate on the web and social media. We should expect a lot more of these types of false reports as people find themselves on edge which is exactly what Islamic terror groups are hoping.
One of the questions being asked is: why France? Some attacks conducted by Islamic Terrorists are clearly well planned and purposely chosen for symbolism such as the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon or the 7/7 bombings in London. Other attacks that are more "lone wolf" such as the Ft Hood shooting or the British soldier run down and beheaded in a London street in the middle of the afternoon are attacks of opportunity. It is impossible to know where attacks of opportunity are going to arise but symbolic attacks take much more planning and it might be useful to examine the motivating factors behind the Paris onslaught for nations to examine their own history and policies that may make them a target. A recent analysis by Elliot Friedland for the Clarion Project.org believes ISIS prioritizes which countries to attack, and when. He offers five top reasons that Paris, and France in general was singled out: 1. France has been fighting the Islamic State and other Islamists, and so far has been the only European country to join the air strikes with the U.S; 2. France has specifically named the Islamist ideology as the problem. They have stated that they are at war with radical Islam and have taken steps against other extremist groups; 3. France is standing up for its values and seeking to integrate Muslims. ISIS finds this unacceptable. The model proposed by Prime Minister Manuel Valls explicitly stated: “We seek to establish a model of Islam that is fully integrated, fully compatible with the values of the Republic.” 4. Paris represents the enlightenment values of Western civilization. ISIS derides Paris as “the capital of prostitution and vice, the lead carrier of the cross in Europe - Paris.” 5. The Islamic State is obsessed with history and honor. It carries a grudge with France over what it sees as historical injustices dating back to the 11th century, and now seeks to re-assert itself over Europe whilst taking the form the revived Muslim Caliphate. None of the above are reasons that would resonate with civilized modern society, yet as usually happens, such attacks still tend to motivate other potential terrorists to launch their own offensives. They thrive on riding the publicity waves as far as possible, while media interest and social focus on terror is still at its highest. Ryan Mauro of ClarionProject.org suggests that there are several ISIS threats that now loom large: 1. “Copycat" attacks by the Islamic State and other Islamist terrorist supporters, including those who are loyal to Al-Qaeda, who want to show that the group hasn't become a ‘has-been’ in the jihadist world - such as Mali. 2. There are those who will worry that they might now lose their chance to strike and earn their ticket to Paradise by dying in jihad as a "martyr." Supporters of the Islamic State have every reason to expect Western governments to become extra aggressive in rounding up possible terrorists. ISIS supporters who believe they are on the authorities' radar could choose to act sooner instead of patiently preparing their plot and risk being foiled, as suggested by the terror alert in Belgium. Mauro believes that the recent attacks will earn ISIS a wave of recruits and encourage the millions of Islamic State supporters who have yet to take up arms finally to act upon their beliefs. The West will need to push back and counteract the ISIS propaganda scores, by persistently reminding ISIS and the world of the group’s failures, mistakes and acts of terror, all carried out in the name of Islam. In a recent analysis published in Christian Headlines.com, Ayman S. Ibrahim states four ways that ISIS bases its acts of violence on religion, and why it matters: 1. ISIS based its actions on a literal reading of the Qur'an. It views itself as truly Islamic and claims its actions are supported by the Qur'an. 2. For ISIS followers, France is at war with Islam. The ISIS-issued statement that accepted responsibility for the attacks portrays France (and its allies) as Crusaders, literally “the holders of the Cross,” portraying the war in purely religious terms. 3. The attacks were meant to imitate seventh-century raids led by the Prophet Muhammad. The statement identified the Paris attacks using the Arabic term “ghazwa”, meaning ‘battle’. This term is said to have been primarily used in the biography of Muhammad, in reference to his raids and expeditions against the non-Muslims in the Arabian Peninsula in the seventh century. 4. The terrorists viewed themselves as martyrs for Islam. They died, the statement said, to support the cause of the true religion and in fulfillment of the charges of the Prophet Muhammad to humiliate enemies, rubbing “their noses in the dusty ground.” Ayman concludes that to claim that all Muslims are terrorists is far from correct, but to deny or underestimate the significant power and influence of some Islamic texts and specific interpretations of them is not prudent, either.
Given the subtle references, this is perhaps the most impressive work by Investors Business Daily brilliant editorial cartoonist Michael Ramirez in many a moon.
Obama is in fact a turkey, in more ways than one.
Obama has great affection for Turkey and their Prime Minister, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. As we have previously reported, our commander in chief is an individual who seeks the degrading and transformation of America to a bit player, defines the USA as a country that must pay for its perceived sins as an oppressor and an individual seeking to advance the caliphate, where a Muslim country regains power similar to the days of the old Ottoman Empire. In short, it is reasonable to conclude, by his actions, our president is playing for the other team. And on this team is in PM. Erdoğan. Neither individual is the least bit concerned about the activities of ISIS, who they see as offer a necessary function in cleansing the territory from infidels.
Obama is an enemy within, hiding in plain sight, with America unable to see the forest from within the trees.
In Sept of 2014, we noted Obama was enabling enemies of state, arming terrorist organizations and helping to create the chaos necessary to fuel the flames of insurgency, all of which escalates the power Iran yields in the middle east. Obama is not delusional. His actions, assisting Iran in forming the caliphate, with ISIS free to do the necessary cleansing, are intentional and orchestrated.
Back in late June, Brigitte Gabriel, founder of Act for America who has been fighting radical Islam's attempts to infiltrate and take over the west for years, spoke at the Family Research Council's Watchmen on the Wall event. In this video, she briefly outlines the Muslim Brotherhood's plan for the destruction of Western civilization, which is inexplicably being assisted from within.
ACT for America president and founder Brigitte Gabriel, speaks at the Family Research Council's Watchmen on the Wall event about the threat of radical Islam. In this clip she outlines the Muslim Brotherhood's plan for the destruction of Western civilization. The Muslim Brotherhood has spawned dozens and dozens of organizations across the globe, including the terrorist organizations al Qaeda, Hamas, and numerous Muslim organizations in America. Full version of speech linked HERE
BAHL is a REALTOR, Real Estate Investor and Residential Real Estate Appraiser in Orlando. He holds a BS degree in Economics from Florida State University.
Due to the actions of the brass at Missouri, they have this coming in spades.
France has been a target of the Islamic State as far back as the Crusades, exacerbated in recent times by the collapse of expected negotiations of territory in the aftermath of the Sykes-Picot Agreement of 1916, of which, interestingly enough, Russia, was a party. "The Islamic State is obsessed with history and honor. It carries a grudge with France over what it sees as historical injustices dating back to the 11th century" noted Tom Olago. When ISIS says they will conquer Rome, they are referring to Paris. Therefore, expect ISIS attacks on Paris to continue.
