The Swamp Strikes Back by J. Christian Adams
Showing posts with label Constitution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Constitution. Show all posts
Sunday, June 10, 2018
Monday, November 6, 2017
Sunday, November 6, 2016
Tuesday, June 21, 2016
Crisis Management
In the aftermath of the horrific terrorist attack in the SODO district of downtown Orlando, like clockwork, the left has unleashed an well coordinated and financed attack, not on those responsible for the attack, but on law abiding citizens of this nation.
Imagine the arrogance of this crowd, who immediately take their progressive ideology of government knows best to making tracks to steal your rights outlined for you in our Constitution away from you?
It is not just them.
Progressive republicans are sadly all too willing to join the fight.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
What part of this do these progressive elites not comprehend?
And for those who scoff at the idea the citizenry may at some point have to defend ourselves against a tyrannical government, they identify themselves as illiterate in history.
Sen. Ted Cruz took to the floor of the Senate to call these folks out.
Cruz accurately summed it up in a Tweet.
Forget that the progressive left has no right to infringe on the rights of the citizenry bestowed upon them in the Constitution, we are at war.
Ask anyone at Pulse; the government will fall far short in their efforts to protect you. When it comes to crisis
management amidst a terror attack, you must protect yourself.
And against these ISIS fighters, that will be mighty tough to do after your government has disarmed you.
Imagine the arrogance of this crowd, who immediately take their progressive ideology of government knows best to making tracks to steal your rights outlined for you in our Constitution away from you?
It is not just them.
Progressive republicans are sadly all too willing to join the fight.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
What part of this do these progressive elites not comprehend?
And for those who scoff at the idea the citizenry may at some point have to defend ourselves against a tyrannical government, they identify themselves as illiterate in history.
Sen. Ted Cruz took to the floor of the Senate to call these folks out.
Cruz accurately summed it up in a Tweet.
Forget that the progressive left has no right to infringe on the rights of the citizenry bestowed upon them in the Constitution, we are at war.
Ask anyone at Pulse; the government will fall far short in their efforts to protect you. When it comes to crisis
management amidst a terror attack, you must protect yourself.
And against these ISIS fighters, that will be mighty tough to do after your government has disarmed you.
Monday, May 16, 2016
To The Moon
If you ever wondered just how far our nation has fallen, your answer has just been summed up in rather stunning and simplistic fashion.
Earlier in his administration, President Obama charged NASA with Muslim outreach.
President Obama noted in Missouri just prior to his election in 2008 that "we are five days away from fundamentally transforming The United States of America" to an arena with resounding cheers.
Did these morons cheering have any idea what Obama would do to our once proud nation? What exactly would he be transforming us into?
John F. Kennedy asked you to "ask not what your country can do for you, but you can do for your country."
Barack Obama thinks the Constitution is an imperfect document, one which reflects deep flaws, noting "the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. It says what the states can't do to you, it says what the federal government can't do to you, but it doesn't say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf."
There is a huge difference in these two men, and the Obama inner staff has little regard for JFK.
Obama has succeeded in transforming our nation, and for those who champion liberty and freedom, this is a most ominous development.
If only Jackie Gleason could instruct NASA to send Obama to the moon, and rid our nation of his anti-American influences.
Earlier in his administration, President Obama charged NASA with Muslim outreach.
President Obama noted in Missouri just prior to his election in 2008 that "we are five days away from fundamentally transforming The United States of America" to an arena with resounding cheers.
Did these morons cheering have any idea what Obama would do to our once proud nation? What exactly would he be transforming us into?
John F. Kennedy asked you to "ask not what your country can do for you, but you can do for your country."
Barack Obama thinks the Constitution is an imperfect document, one which reflects deep flaws, noting "the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. It says what the states can't do to you, it says what the federal government can't do to you, but it doesn't say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf."
There is a huge difference in these two men, and the Obama inner staff has little regard for JFK.
Obama has succeeded in transforming our nation, and for those who champion liberty and freedom, this is a most ominous development.
If only Jackie Gleason could instruct NASA to send Obama to the moon, and rid our nation of his anti-American influences.
Monday, February 29, 2016
The Case For Cruz
To take a step back, the wide field for the GOP was a collection of outstanding individuals for consideration, with each and every one of them far superior to anyone the Democrats have running or thinking of running.
While a couple of them had no hope, some had stellar backgrounds and compelling visions for the future of America.
Rick Perry and Scott Walker were very accomplished men who for whatever reason were eliminated early on. Both were outstanding, conservative governors.
Bobby Jindal has always impressed, but although he came out swinging, he never got any hits.
Sen. Rand Paul we hold in very high regard, but he got off kilter in many of the debates and did not in our estimation adequately address the terror issue, which sadly became a top discussion point in the aftermath of terrorist activity.
Carly Fiorina was tremendous, calling out folks and speaking with eloquent and intellectual precision, but she never could keep hold of gains she would make. If it were up to me, I would find something for her to do in the next administration.
The time has passed for Mike Huckabee and Rick Santorum, although Santorum does have keen insight on the Islamic situation, which could benefit the next president.
Chris Christie is a very smart guy and quite capable. But over time, we have learned of his progressive leanings and we cannot get past his embrace, seemingly for political purposes, of President Obama in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy. Brokeback Boardwalk we found appalling.
As governor of Florida, we had absolutely no complaints with the performance of Jeb Bush. But Bush is now an open border man, spearheaded common core and thinks we need to move away from the Reagan years. He must have lost his ever loving mind. Thanks, but no thanks.
We have never really embraced John Kasich, who we consider a conservative Democrat. Had he switched parties, he may well be our next President. He is a fan of Common Core and thinks government can pick winners and losers, which I abhor.
Dr. Ben Carson is a brilliant mind and a wonderful person, and would be dealing with healthcare issues in the next administration if it were up to me. But we never saw him as "the man" this go around.
That leaves Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz and Donald Trump.
Marco Rubio got our vote for Senate in Florida, where he campaigned as a Tea Party guy. We elected him to go stop Obama. Next thing we know, Rubio has team with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R:SC) and Sen. Chuck Schumer (D:NY) to craft an immigration policy which allows forms of amnesty. In addition, Rubio cast the sixtieth vote on the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP), which we consider an attack on American sovereignty. Therefore, of the remaining three, he gets our bronze.
Donald Trump is an individual I have always liked over the years, and love his book "The Art of the Deal." In 2011, we asked Trump to run as a Democrat to derail Hillary, as Trump himself said he has always thought of himself as more of a Democrat. Trump is scoring big on the issue of the border, and is also against the TPP, which no doubt helped him get the endorsement of Sen. Jeff Sessions (R:AL), one of our favorites.
We have been very disappointed with the demeanor carried by Trump during the campaign. Trump does not take criticism lightly and appears to have an enemies list of those who he considers an opponent, which we do not condone. Trump appears to not have a deep understanding of the Constitution, and seems uninterested with the constraints of placed on government within the document. He recently said he supports the healthcare mandate, which we deem unconstitutional.
The list of people who despise the candidacy of Trump includes many of our favorite folks, inclusive of Mark Levin, Glenn Beck, Sen. Ben Sasse (R:NE), Dana Loesch, Andrew McCarthy, Dr. Thomas Sowell and David Barton to name a few.
Other folks we like are backing Trump, inclusive of Sen. Sessions, are Sarah Palin, Michael Savage, Eric Bolling and Steve Forbes.
Trump will get things done, and we consider him perhaps the Grey Champion described in work of Strauss and Howe in their "The Fourth Turning" book. As described by Jim Quinn of The Burning Platform, the Grey Champion "doesn't necessarily have to be a good person, but they must lead and display tremendous confidence in their cause and path." As America enters the period of a Fourth Turning, the arrival of a Grey Champion is a must, and he will come. Is he here?
While Trump is intriguing, a breath of fresh air and someone ready to place a well deserved kick in the ass to not only the GOP establishment but the entire ruling class, he exhibits too many liabilities to garner my support in the primary.
That leaves Sen. Ted Cruz.
In the last several weeks, the Cruz campaign has lapsed, having been taken off message and blindsided by some decisions made by staff members. Cruz is in the weeds trading insults with Rubio and Trump and the news media. Just this Sunday on FOX News, Cruz appropriately called out Chris Wallace, but when given the opportunity to knock him out with truth, failed to do so.
Cruz needs to get back to his original message, which empowers the individual, limits government, forces financial sanity and returns our nation the the friendly confines of the Constitution.
Much is made that Cruz is not well liked, but we view that as a positive. My vote is not sending him to Washington to get along with and do deals with progressives and socialist whose objective is to transform, if not ruin, the country as founded.
I know which politicians have been fighting Obama every step of the way, and Cruz leads that brigade. Cruz is a principled man with great respect for our founding who is country first, recognizing the expansive opportunities available in an America which champions liberty and freedom.
A major divide in the GOP is forming, and good people are getting in unnecessary scraps. All of the blame can be placed on the GOP establishment, who have become one with the ruling class and have rejected the will of the governed.
While my ballot will be cast for Cruz, I fear it is too late with the Trump train having already left the station and I am quite certain Trump will win Florida easily.
Should Trump become the eventual nominee, while I have reservations beyond those documented above, I will support him against Hillary Clinton, who could never secure my vote, Micheal Bloomberg, who could never secure my vote, or a GOP establishment candidate (Mitt Romney?)should the GOP start playing games down the road.
America is over with the games, and that is why, in large measure, Trump is on his way to a landslide win, not only in the primary, but in November as well.
I think the Grey Champion is here.
Sunday, February 14, 2016
Obama Now Embraces Constitution
The death of Justice Antonin Scalia has kit the fuse on what will become a raging fire throughout the remainder of the 2016 election as the President ponders a replacement.
Seeing an huge opportunity for political gain, now Obama wants to follow the Constitution.
"I plan to fulfill my constitutional responsibilities to nominate a successor in due time. These are responsibilities that I take seriously, as should everyone. They’re bigger than any one party. They are about our democracy. They’re about the institution to which Justice Scalia dedicated his professional life, and making sure it continues to function as the beacon of justice that our Founders envisioned".
Although Obama, with his hand placed on the Quran, took an oath pledging "to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States", he has spent his presidency trying to discredit and diminish the cornerstone document of our founding.
From Obamacare to EPA legislation encompassing a wide landscape, Obama and his team have taken creative and expansive action to operate outside what they deem as constraints within the Constitution and in many instances against the will of the American people.
In fact, as was known prior to his first election, Obama considers the Constitution an imperfect document encrypted with racism, viewing it with utter disdain.
"It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it’s been interpreted, and the Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf" said Obama.
To think America was compelled to elect this anti-American individual president TWICE is mind boggling.
Obama is an opponent of our nation as founded, and, as he said he would, will take any and every opportunity presented him to right his incorrectly perceived wrongs and punitively punish is those who stand in opposition.
Seeing an huge opportunity for political gain, now Obama wants to follow the Constitution.
"I plan to fulfill my constitutional responsibilities to nominate a successor in due time. These are responsibilities that I take seriously, as should everyone. They’re bigger than any one party. They are about our democracy. They’re about the institution to which Justice Scalia dedicated his professional life, and making sure it continues to function as the beacon of justice that our Founders envisioned".
Although Obama, with his hand placed on the Quran, took an oath pledging "to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States", he has spent his presidency trying to discredit and diminish the cornerstone document of our founding.
From Obamacare to EPA legislation encompassing a wide landscape, Obama and his team have taken creative and expansive action to operate outside what they deem as constraints within the Constitution and in many instances against the will of the American people.
In fact, as was known prior to his first election, Obama considers the Constitution an imperfect document encrypted with racism, viewing it with utter disdain.
"It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it’s been interpreted, and the Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf" said Obama.
To think America was compelled to elect this anti-American individual president TWICE is mind boggling.
Obama is an opponent of our nation as founded, and, as he said he would, will take any and every opportunity presented him to right his incorrectly perceived wrongs and punitively punish is those who stand in opposition.
A Devastating Death
 |
| Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, dead at 79 |
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia passed away early Saturday morning while on a hunting trip in Texas apparently from natural causes.
Scalia was 79.
“This is a devastating loss for people who love this country. It’s a devastating loss for those of us who love the Constitution,” said radio talk show host and Constitutional scholar Mark Levin.
Devastating indeed.
Scalia, appointed to the bench by President Ronald Reagan in 1986, was perhaps one of the greatest supreme court justices has seen in a century.
An individual with extreme intellect, Scalia's writings, often in dissent, were often laced with wit and sharply directed commentary at liberal ideologies which were a pleasure to dissect.
Unlike some of his colleagues, and what seems to be a position gaining support across the nation, Scalia appropriately advocating the interpreting the Constitution by its original intent and wording, not viewing the cornerstone document of our founding as something to be tinkered with by intellectual elites who think they know best.
“It’s an absolute disaster. Let me put it this way, Scalia is kind of the Churchill, the Thatcher, and the Reagan of the Supreme Court. He wasn’t even Chief Justice and yet his impact has been massive as an originalist,” Levin went on. “The point is, he moved the Court in ways that the Court would never have moved before, even though we have these disastrous opinions coming from the Court, the brilliance of his decisions … he was able to cobble together often four justices, sometimes five justices. He was energetic, he was intellectually bracing. He was by far the leader of that Court, and there are great Justices on that Court,” added Levin.
Judge Scalia will leave a huge void, one that could have negative ramifications on this nation for eternity. In fact, it occurred to me upon learning of Scalia's passing we may have just lost the country.
Scalia was a faithful defender of the Constitution. To Scalia, the Constitution was not a living and breathing document; it was dead, dead, dead.
America will suffer without his protection on the court, and if republicans in the senate do not step up fiercely within the fire, our country as we have known her may have perished on this Saturday along with beloved Justice Scalia.
“God assumed from the beginning that the wise of the world would view Christians as fools ... and he has not been disappointed,” Scalia said. “If I have brought any message today, it is this: Have the courage to have your wisdom regarded as stupidity,” he added. “Be fools for Christ. And have the courage to suffer the contempt of the sophisticated world.” --Justice Antonin Scalia
Sunday, January 31, 2016
Covert Martial Law?
"While you were following the snowstorm, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R:KY) was busy preparing the way for a proposal". “This resolution is a total rewrite of the War Powers Clause in the U.S. Constitution,” said Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CN). “It is essentially a declaration of international martial law, a sweeping transfer of military power to the president that will allow him or her to send U.S. troops almost anywhere in the world, for almost any reason, with absolutely no limitations.” "AUMF, written by Sen. Lindsey Graham, (R:SC), is packaged as a proposal to fight the Islamic State group — but it would also allow the president to deploy military forces anywhere he chooses and for as long as he wants" wrote Voice of Reason.
As noted by Investment Watch Blog, this proposal could open the door to covertly allow Martial Law on US streets.
Obama can kick the ass of ISIS any hour he decides, but continues to choose not to.
Obama is interested in punishing his domestic enemies, and VP Biden has previously described Tea Party members as terrorists. What you consider terrorists are freedom fighters to Obama. Who would be considered terrorists should civil unrest occur after an economic collapse?
No matter.
No President should be given unlimited war powers, and those who effort to operate outside the Constitution should be considered enemies of our nation.
Obama can kick the ass of ISIS any hour he decides, but continues to choose not to.
Obama is interested in punishing his domestic enemies, and VP Biden has previously described Tea Party members as terrorists. What you consider terrorists are freedom fighters to Obama. Who would be considered terrorists should civil unrest occur after an economic collapse?
No matter.
No President should be given unlimited war powers, and those who effort to operate outside the Constitution should be considered enemies of our nation.
Wednesday, December 9, 2015
On The Stump, The Media Trumped
GOP Presidential candidate Donald Trump released a statement just at a campaign event Monday evening which has caused the mainstream media to lose their ever loving mind. Please see the following statement Trump read at the campaign event.
The media could not help themselves; after all, it afforded the opportunity to step the nation away from focusing on the stunning, abysmal failure on terrorism of the Obama administration.
It also gave the establishment GOP ruling class a highly sought after opportunity to body slam Trump, who with his substantial poll numbers strikes them with more fear than the ISIS terrorists the have miserably failed to contain.
As usual, Trump crashes on the scene like an out of control garbage truck firing out rhetoric that seemingly is outlandish and extreme. At least that is how it is reported in the media. Every Tom, Dick and Harry is aghast at Trump's statement, with GOP members joining in with the media in lambasting Trump for having the gall to insult our friends in the Muslim community and our allies that are Muslim nations overseas.
Among the overcrowded list include GOP Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R:SC), and even Carly Fiorina, sadly. As Bill Bonner reported, Jeb Bush says he’s “unhinged”…Chris Christie says he has “no idea what [he’s] talking about”…John Kasich accuses him of “outrageous divisiveness”…and Marco Rubio describes him as “offensive and outlandish.” And those are just his fellow Republicans! “Reprehensible… prejudiced…” adds Hillary Clinton.
Not all are against Trump on this issue. Rush Limbaugh does not find it unreasonable. Rand Paul, a fierce critic of Trump on the campaign stump, has previously proposed a plan which was aimed at banning immigration from countries in the Middle East where radical Islam is a big problem. Additionally, Sarah Palin had previously called for profiling of Muslims. Sounds reasonable to me.
While Trump did not do a good job in articulating his objectives, and was actually vague in outlining his potential actions, the premise of his remarks, which we consider to be "calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on" quite reasonable given some simple, "common sense" criteria in application.
It is not unprecedented in this nation. Under number eight of US Code 1182, inadmissible aliens, a law written in 1952 called the Nationality Act, "Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by president. Whenever the president finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, the president may, by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or non-immigrants or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate."
In fact, President Jimmy Carter utilized it to keep Iranians (Obama's good friends) out of our nation during the hostage crisis. Carter, who for those out to lunch, was and still is a staunch Democrat (and a horrible president), actually ordered the deportation of a large number of Iranians.
It is not Donald Trump that is extreme and seeking to derail long standing principles of this nation; that would be transformer in chief Barack Obama. Obama has opened the floodgates to illegal immigrants with Muslim backgrounds.
It would certainly appear that Trump is channeling his inner "Art of the Deal" negotiation strategy, invoking the Overton Window theory regarding immigration in this country.
All illegal immigration needs to be immediately stopped, with the borders (north and south) being sealed. Although the president told us otherwise (liar in chief), US officials admit ISIS is planting operatives among the tens of thousand women, children and orphans invading our nation on a daily basis, which without question, poses significant national security issues.
The legal process of immigration, a process that is heartily welcomed and needed for the survival of our nation, must be promptly streamlined and redesigned to meet the myriad of new challenges the act presents. While there are significant measures to be enacted, and far reaching legalities to be considered, it is not a process that could not be tackled appropriately within 60 days.
Those who are already here who commit a felony crime will be immediately deported if found guilty be our legal process. A plan for those who entered illegally must be drawn up, which include penalties. We have laws, and those whose first act in stepping foot in our nation is to break the law must be assessed punitive penalties.
Many have cited Constitutional issues with Trump's outline for a plan. Call me crazy, but illegal immigrants are not protect by the US Constitution, as they have no legal rights. As of now, and not for the lack of effort by Obama, we are not an open society where all the world is entitled to the benefits of being an American citizen.
Many are very concerned about Trump supposedly insulting the Muslim community. I am far more offended about Obama insulting us, lecturing us repeatedly about how wonderful Islam and the people of that religion are.
Trump is playing everyone. But he is correct. We are at war, and it is beyond nonsensical to allow our nation to be invaded by illegal immigrants from nations that wish us harm, many who belong to a religion that deems us infidels and ultimately seek the establishment of a caliphate to ultimately rule the word. Their words, and the teachings of the Quran, say it is so.
Don't let the lamestream media trump you. Yes, shut the borders down immediately, and allow no more illegal immigration.
The media could not help themselves; after all, it afforded the opportunity to step the nation away from focusing on the stunning, abysmal failure on terrorism of the Obama administration.
It also gave the establishment GOP ruling class a highly sought after opportunity to body slam Trump, who with his substantial poll numbers strikes them with more fear than the ISIS terrorists the have miserably failed to contain.
As usual, Trump crashes on the scene like an out of control garbage truck firing out rhetoric that seemingly is outlandish and extreme. At least that is how it is reported in the media. Every Tom, Dick and Harry is aghast at Trump's statement, with GOP members joining in with the media in lambasting Trump for having the gall to insult our friends in the Muslim community and our allies that are Muslim nations overseas.
Among the overcrowded list include GOP Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R:SC), and even Carly Fiorina, sadly. As Bill Bonner reported, Jeb Bush says he’s “unhinged”…Chris Christie says he has “no idea what [he’s] talking about”…John Kasich accuses him of “outrageous divisiveness”…and Marco Rubio describes him as “offensive and outlandish.” And those are just his fellow Republicans! “Reprehensible… prejudiced…” adds Hillary Clinton.
Not all are against Trump on this issue. Rush Limbaugh does not find it unreasonable. Rand Paul, a fierce critic of Trump on the campaign stump, has previously proposed a plan which was aimed at banning immigration from countries in the Middle East where radical Islam is a big problem. Additionally, Sarah Palin had previously called for profiling of Muslims. Sounds reasonable to me.
While Trump did not do a good job in articulating his objectives, and was actually vague in outlining his potential actions, the premise of his remarks, which we consider to be "calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on" quite reasonable given some simple, "common sense" criteria in application.
It is not unprecedented in this nation. Under number eight of US Code 1182, inadmissible aliens, a law written in 1952 called the Nationality Act, "Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by president. Whenever the president finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, the president may, by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or non-immigrants or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate."
In fact, President Jimmy Carter utilized it to keep Iranians (Obama's good friends) out of our nation during the hostage crisis. Carter, who for those out to lunch, was and still is a staunch Democrat (and a horrible president), actually ordered the deportation of a large number of Iranians.
It is not Donald Trump that is extreme and seeking to derail long standing principles of this nation; that would be transformer in chief Barack Obama. Obama has opened the floodgates to illegal immigrants with Muslim backgrounds.
It would certainly appear that Trump is channeling his inner "Art of the Deal" negotiation strategy, invoking the Overton Window theory regarding immigration in this country.
All illegal immigration needs to be immediately stopped, with the borders (north and south) being sealed. Although the president told us otherwise (liar in chief), US officials admit ISIS is planting operatives among the tens of thousand women, children and orphans invading our nation on a daily basis, which without question, poses significant national security issues.
The legal process of immigration, a process that is heartily welcomed and needed for the survival of our nation, must be promptly streamlined and redesigned to meet the myriad of new challenges the act presents. While there are significant measures to be enacted, and far reaching legalities to be considered, it is not a process that could not be tackled appropriately within 60 days.
Those who are already here who commit a felony crime will be immediately deported if found guilty be our legal process. A plan for those who entered illegally must be drawn up, which include penalties. We have laws, and those whose first act in stepping foot in our nation is to break the law must be assessed punitive penalties.
Many have cited Constitutional issues with Trump's outline for a plan. Call me crazy, but illegal immigrants are not protect by the US Constitution, as they have no legal rights. As of now, and not for the lack of effort by Obama, we are not an open society where all the world is entitled to the benefits of being an American citizen.
Many are very concerned about Trump supposedly insulting the Muslim community. I am far more offended about Obama insulting us, lecturing us repeatedly about how wonderful Islam and the people of that religion are.
Trump is playing everyone. But he is correct. We are at war, and it is beyond nonsensical to allow our nation to be invaded by illegal immigrants from nations that wish us harm, many who belong to a religion that deems us infidels and ultimately seek the establishment of a caliphate to ultimately rule the word. Their words, and the teachings of the Quran, say it is so.
Don't let the lamestream media trump you. Yes, shut the borders down immediately, and allow no more illegal immigration.
Thursday, October 29, 2015
Media Exposed
 |
| CNBC Panel/Carl Quintanilla, Becky Quick & John Harwood |
CNBC used to be a respected network which brought America the financial news it sought well beyond the three major networks. Certainly, there has always been rivaling political presence among the hosts on the network, held in adequate check in years past.
But in the last half decade or so, CNBC has turned into a biased arm of NBC News, which is no longer credible as a unbiased presenter of the truth. There are still good people over at CNBC, most notably Bill Griffith, Sue Herera, Jim Cramer, Joe Kernen and the wonderful Larry Kudlow. But given what America witnessed last night, and make no mistake the suits over at the network are thrilled placing a much higher value on political positions than profits or God forbid the truth, they may not have the lights on much longer.
Several former employees have made their way over to FOX Business Channel, inclusive of Neil Cavuto, Stuart Varney, Lou Dobbs, Eric Bolling, Trish Regan, Melissa Francis and the "Money Honey", Maria Bartiromo.
Becky Quick used to be quite good, but the arrogance dripping off her blouse last night flooded the stage. Carl Quintanilla has seemingly gone the way of Tom Costello (now at NBC News), a good reporter who reached certain status and turned political.
John Harwood, a supposed new representative of parent NBC News who gleefully baths in Barack Obama's bathwater, has a long history of partisan journalism. Harwood extended himself so far out last night, he arrogantly lied on the issue of Marco Rubio's tax plan. I wonder how many Americans thought he may have a point no doubt missed Megyn Kelly pointing out Harwood's lie.
Jim Cramer, and animated truth teller Rick Santelli, got a few questions in an effort to stem accusations of bias, but it failed miserably to work.
Senator Ted Cruz, R:TX, had enough and called the panel out.
The comments made by Cruz received the highest register among the polling by Frank Luntz of Luntz Global since he began charting responses in 1996.
Incidentally, the second highest rating came when Sen. Marco Rubio, R:FL, labeled the mainstream media a Hillary Clinton Super PAC.
BAM! The truth just hit everyone across the forehead with a two by four.
The media was given special privileges to operate to keep the three branches of government in check. As Rubio, and Cruz, pointed out last night with lethal precision, that has not bee the case in America for some time.
It is among the many reasons America is now suffering, falling significantly short of reaching her potential. As such, these individuals who are part of the propaganda machine protecting the elected officials operating in contempt of our Constitiution should be considered enemies within.
Friday, September 11, 2015
Have You Forgotten
 |
| The World Trade Center |
Christians are being killed at alarming levels, yet our president continues to call out republicans for their evil attempts to adhere to the Constitution. We have officially become a nation of men; not laws.
And we have countless enemies within.
Have you forgotten?
Windows on the world
Evil spit in our face on the morning of September 11, 2001. As America sought comfort on this horrendous day, most found God watching over us. We had faith, which helped us through the incredible grief. With evil lurking all around us, we found love, courage and faith standing tall in the fire.
Although this is a day of remembrance, we must never forget!I have not forgotten. Never Forget! Political correctness be damned, we must remain committed to taking out evil wherever it exists, foreign or domestic.
GOD BLESS AMERICA
*PORTIONS REPRINTED FROM 9-11-11 BLOGPOST.
Sunday, July 12, 2015
Fencing
It should be obvious. If the federal government wanted a fence to be built to prohibit illegal immigrants from entering our country, it would be built.
Despite their continued commentary to the contrary, our progressive leaders actually want illegal immigration, many housed in sanctuary cities.
For starters, they like the cheap labor, but much deeper in scope, these folks deem America an oppressive nation and wish to transfer the wealth to those America stepped on along the way to becoming the superpower it now is, although efforts by the current administration to diminish our standing have been quite effective.
In addition, they seek open borders. That is why you see continued efforts to govern outside of the Constitution, hoping to make it irrelevant in the future. Treaties with the UN, monetary agreements with the IMF and so forth are designed to render the Constitution powerless and place Uncle Sam under control of a global governance of un-elected bureaucrats that are out of the reach of your ballot box.
As for NASCAR's Coke Zero 400, where the above pictured crash took place late last Sunday evening, I found the #3 NRA Chevrolet SS of Austin Dillon to be a pretty sharp looking ride earlier in the week in a practice session at the World Center of Racing, the Daytona International Speedway.
Despite their continued commentary to the contrary, our progressive leaders actually want illegal immigration, many housed in sanctuary cities.
For starters, they like the cheap labor, but much deeper in scope, these folks deem America an oppressive nation and wish to transfer the wealth to those America stepped on along the way to becoming the superpower it now is, although efforts by the current administration to diminish our standing have been quite effective.
In addition, they seek open borders. That is why you see continued efforts to govern outside of the Constitution, hoping to make it irrelevant in the future. Treaties with the UN, monetary agreements with the IMF and so forth are designed to render the Constitution powerless and place Uncle Sam under control of a global governance of un-elected bureaucrats that are out of the reach of your ballot box.
As for NASCAR's Coke Zero 400, where the above pictured crash took place late last Sunday evening, I found the #3 NRA Chevrolet SS of Austin Dillon to be a pretty sharp looking ride earlier in the week in a practice session at the World Center of Racing, the Daytona International Speedway.
 |
| #3 NRA Chevrolet SS driven by Austin Dillon |
Thursday, March 26, 2015
Cruz Control
 |
| Sen. Ted Cruz R:TX |
Sadly, as expected, his entrance sparked explosive commentary from the entire spectrum of political discourse.
You will not find a more glaring example of hypocrisy among all the smiling faces of many of your favorite left wing lunatics and politicians (actually one in the same) than their reaction to the entry of Sen. Cruz. Many left wing pundits seemed stunned, which is bull crap as those wagering the field had very high odds on Cruz getting in.
Then came the comparisons to Obama, and these are nothing short of pure comedy.
When Obama ran as a first term Senator, one who voted present most often, he was viewed as fresh, with bold new ideas. Cruz, who has challenged the broken Washington machine on numerous occasions, has been labeled inexperienced, not ready for the vigor associated with our highest office. This "inexperience" had no bearing on the left in 2000, as we elected a president with no executive experience of any kind.
Then came questions about the birthplace of Cruz, and if he is eligible to be president. Cruz was born in Canada and is a natural born citizen and has produced any and all necessary paperwork to close the issue, unlike Obama. Although it has not been a focus on this blog, Obama has skirted producing paperwork to close up his issue in this arena. Those on the right who have questioned Obama's birthplace have been ridiculed and deemed racist, but that is not the case for those questioning Cruz.
Due to his entry in the race, Cruz's wife Heidi, took a leave of absence from her position at Goldman Sachs, and with that, Cruz had to seek health insurance. Therefore, he enrolled in Obamacare, which since Cruz has vowed to repeal every word of Obamacare, seems beyond entertaining to the left. Sadly, Obamacare is the law of the land, and Cruz is simply following the law. This, of course, is a foreign concept to Obama and his Obamabots nationwide.
The mainstream media, who watch and cheer while Obama violates the Constitution seemingly on a daily basis, has joined in lockstep with all the talking points, bashing Cruz at every turn on anything and everything.
Why should he left have all the fun?
You just knew those on the progressive right would jump in with the Democrats and hit Cruz. Karl Rove, who backs Jeb Bush, immediately came forward in an attempt to discredit Cruz. I could have initiated a countdown waiting for Rep. Peter King of New York to come out swinging. The former boxer must have had his head hit too much, for he is clueless on Cruz, his record and his chance to win. King, who sits on numerous committess enabling the decline of America, has also gone after Sen Rand Paul.
I must admit I was surprised to see some folks I respect hit Cruz, inclusive of Greg Gutfeld and Eric Boling of "The Five" and DW Ulsterman. Gutfeld thinks Cruz lacks vision for country, but has plenty for himself, which I totally disagree with. The position Ulsterman takes, along with Boling, is that, although he thinks very highly of Cruz, he deems him not ready at this time. Among the hosts on "The Five", Breitbart reports that Kimberly Guilfoyle, perhaps the most beautiful woman on news television, was the most receptive to the candidacy of Cruz.
It is way too early to handicap the field for me, but I would list Tex Cruz at or very near the top of my list. What I do know is that those attempting to discredit Cruz are speaking very loudly about something they do not want you to hear.
Progressive opponents of freedom and liberty; those who aspire for big government and crony capitalism, will ridicule and distort the facts, screaming loudly about opponents they fear the most. Are you listening?
Wednesday, January 7, 2015
Protection of Power Pinnacle for Boehner
 |
| Rep. Louie Gohmert |
This was the most significant challenge to a sitting Speaker of the House in almost a century, and those who took this challenge upon themselves are to be congratulated.
I have longed for someone to take this step, as I deem Boehner a paper tiger who has failed miserably to thwart the onslaught of President Obama. I hoped Michele Bachmann would make this move a few years back, but it failed to come to fruition.
 |
| Speaker John Boehner |
You might think Boehner, given the significance of the challenge, might take this opportunity to take the high road and reach out to those who voted against him with the hope of coming together to fight the Obama agenda. You would be wrong.
Rep. Steve King, R:IA, one of the good guys, tweeted out that before the dust could settle, Boehner kicked Webster and Rep. Rich Nugent, R:FL, off the Rules Committee in a juvenile act of retaliation. Rep. Gohmert was not amused, promising a "nasty fight", yet Boehner defended his action.
Sadly, it should be obvious to anyone that Speaker Boehner is more interested and protective of his own power than he is the will of the people or the Constitution of the United States of America.
Therefore, I continue to view him as an opponent, a big government progressive elite.
And with his victory, the ruling class is again victorious.
Monday, December 22, 2014
Wednesday, November 19, 2014
Tuesday, November 18, 2014
Thwart The Tyrannical President
On election Tuesday a few weeks back, the policies of President Barack Obama, each and everyone of them, were on the ballot. President Obama himself said it, seemingly in a taunt to the GOP, an in reality, the voters he holds in such deep disdain. The policies, Every single one of them!
The voters, who over the last decade have seemingly been acting out a conclusion drawn by Aldous Huxley in his novel Brave New World where he claims the electorate would be engulfed in a sea of irrelevance, appeared to have gained friction to hand President Obama a resounding defeat seen rarely in the last century.
There are those who thought this bitter defeat would force Obama to move toward the center and work with the GOP to achieve the desires of the electorate. They do not know him, his goals, his narcissism and his deep rooted goal of transforming (his word), destroying (my word) this great nation.
Rush Limbaugh is rarely speechless, but the comments by Sen. Mitch McConnell in response to the defiance of President Obama gave him cottonmouth. "The president continues to send signals that he has no intention of moving toward the middle", said McConnell.
If this is a harbinger of the complete lack of understanding by the GOP, presumably our only avenue of hope against our tyrannical leader, of the extremely serious state of Constitutional crisis our nation is in, we are in the deep depths of trouble.
Obama did not listen to the message the voters sent; he could care less. Obama said he heard those who did not vote, taken over by his narcissism, knowing that those non-voters were in support of him and his policies.
Until the Obama presidency is over, our nation is in great peril. Although presenting rhetoric to the contrary, Obama has always governed against the consent of the governed. Obamacare, a historically significant piece of legislation, was passed after several deals were cut without one republican vote. Although many knew at the time and sang from the mountain tops, we have come to learn the American people were deceived and lied to about the real aspects of the plan, and most notably, the costs. You Lie!
Obama will now mash the gas pedal to implement his objectives by any means necessary, championing the mantra presented by one of his mentors, Saul Alinsky. Obama does not care if the constitution is violated, laws are broken or the voters are deceived, as long as he gets what he thinks he needs to get done.
The main items Obama will attempt to push through will dramatically change our nation, and not for the better if you seek individual freedom and prosperity. In fact, they will usher in chaos, another Alinsky objective.
It began with a deal Obama recently struck on Climate Change with China. We will seek to reduce dramatically our greenhouse gas output over the next decade while China, the worlds largest polluter, will attempt to begin efforts in this regard in 2025. Are you kidding me? This deal is so backwards, even you Democrats should be able to decipher this is not about the weather, pollution or our possibly changing climate patterns. It is about control over the citizenry, perhaps eventually under the governance of The United Nations.
Obama will seek to achieve Net Neutrality, which is nothing more than an avenue to regulate free speech and silence political opponents. For evidence, seek to get familiar with Obama adviser Mark Lloyd, who greatly admires the effort of Venezuela in this regard. Net Neutrality should be parked.
Obama will seek to allow amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants and their immediate families, who would be set to receive immediate access to welfare and other public benefits. Although this is portrayed to be an economic plus, the huge influx of low skilled workers diminishes skilled labor wages, the working families Obama and every democrat claim to get up every morning to help. Obama knows this; however, he does not convey the truth to you, unless you read his book. In reality, it is about crashing the system, a dream of the disciples of The Cloward and Piven Strategy. While Obamacare can be chipped away, amnesty is irreversible.
It is time to man up!
This is not about an election, or republicans versus democrats. This is about our very system of governance. Obama stated it prior to being elected in 2008, when he spoke of viewing the Constitution as an imperfect charter of negative liberties, saying what the federal government can't do to you, but it doesn't say what the federal government can or should do on your behalf. That is a far cry from the John F. Kennedy inaugural speech, where he asked not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country.
Radio talk show host Mark Levin, The Great One, brilliantly states the high stakes involved and our intolerance of feckless republicans who seem all to eager to join the democrats at the spigot of power, placing more value on their positions in the ruling class rather than defending the Constitution. Hear his epic rant, via The Right Scoop, HERE.
This fight is indeed about defending the republic. Nothing should rate at a higher level of importance as Obama seeks to seize constitutional power from the United States Congress. Through any and every legally permissible action, this encroachment on our system of government by an imperial and tyrannical president must be thwarted.
The voters, who over the last decade have seemingly been acting out a conclusion drawn by Aldous Huxley in his novel Brave New World where he claims the electorate would be engulfed in a sea of irrelevance, appeared to have gained friction to hand President Obama a resounding defeat seen rarely in the last century.
There are those who thought this bitter defeat would force Obama to move toward the center and work with the GOP to achieve the desires of the electorate. They do not know him, his goals, his narcissism and his deep rooted goal of transforming (his word), destroying (my word) this great nation.
Rush Limbaugh is rarely speechless, but the comments by Sen. Mitch McConnell in response to the defiance of President Obama gave him cottonmouth. "The president continues to send signals that he has no intention of moving toward the middle", said McConnell.
If this is a harbinger of the complete lack of understanding by the GOP, presumably our only avenue of hope against our tyrannical leader, of the extremely serious state of Constitutional crisis our nation is in, we are in the deep depths of trouble.
Obama did not listen to the message the voters sent; he could care less. Obama said he heard those who did not vote, taken over by his narcissism, knowing that those non-voters were in support of him and his policies.
Until the Obama presidency is over, our nation is in great peril. Although presenting rhetoric to the contrary, Obama has always governed against the consent of the governed. Obamacare, a historically significant piece of legislation, was passed after several deals were cut without one republican vote. Although many knew at the time and sang from the mountain tops, we have come to learn the American people were deceived and lied to about the real aspects of the plan, and most notably, the costs. You Lie!
Obama will now mash the gas pedal to implement his objectives by any means necessary, championing the mantra presented by one of his mentors, Saul Alinsky. Obama does not care if the constitution is violated, laws are broken or the voters are deceived, as long as he gets what he thinks he needs to get done.
The main items Obama will attempt to push through will dramatically change our nation, and not for the better if you seek individual freedom and prosperity. In fact, they will usher in chaos, another Alinsky objective.
It began with a deal Obama recently struck on Climate Change with China. We will seek to reduce dramatically our greenhouse gas output over the next decade while China, the worlds largest polluter, will attempt to begin efforts in this regard in 2025. Are you kidding me? This deal is so backwards, even you Democrats should be able to decipher this is not about the weather, pollution or our possibly changing climate patterns. It is about control over the citizenry, perhaps eventually under the governance of The United Nations.
Obama will seek to achieve Net Neutrality, which is nothing more than an avenue to regulate free speech and silence political opponents. For evidence, seek to get familiar with Obama adviser Mark Lloyd, who greatly admires the effort of Venezuela in this regard. Net Neutrality should be parked.
Obama will seek to allow amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants and their immediate families, who would be set to receive immediate access to welfare and other public benefits. Although this is portrayed to be an economic plus, the huge influx of low skilled workers diminishes skilled labor wages, the working families Obama and every democrat claim to get up every morning to help. Obama knows this; however, he does not convey the truth to you, unless you read his book. In reality, it is about crashing the system, a dream of the disciples of The Cloward and Piven Strategy. While Obamacare can be chipped away, amnesty is irreversible.
It is time to man up!
This is not about an election, or republicans versus democrats. This is about our very system of governance. Obama stated it prior to being elected in 2008, when he spoke of viewing the Constitution as an imperfect charter of negative liberties, saying what the federal government can't do to you, but it doesn't say what the federal government can or should do on your behalf. That is a far cry from the John F. Kennedy inaugural speech, where he asked not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country.
Radio talk show host Mark Levin, The Great One, brilliantly states the high stakes involved and our intolerance of feckless republicans who seem all to eager to join the democrats at the spigot of power, placing more value on their positions in the ruling class rather than defending the Constitution. Hear his epic rant, via The Right Scoop, HERE.
This fight is indeed about defending the republic. Nothing should rate at a higher level of importance as Obama seeks to seize constitutional power from the United States Congress. Through any and every legally permissible action, this encroachment on our system of government by an imperial and tyrannical president must be thwarted.
Sunday, November 16, 2014
News Unfit To Print
With seemingly no action to investigate as President Obama sadly runs roughshod over our Constitution, The New York Times appears well staffed in Tallahassee, fabricating targeted news unfit to print. Guilty until proven innocent is now en vogue with the media. Oh well; Go Seminoles!
No doubt, if Mr. Williams is found guilty in a court of law for actions he undertook, he will be held accountable and will face the consequences of his actions. However, it would be my assertion that the self described newspaper of record, with the most corrupt and secretive presidency in modern history, governing outside the law against the will of the American people, would have more meaningful avenues of pursuit than examining traffic citations in Tallahassee, Florida.
 |
| PJ Williams, Florida State |
Wednesday, September 24, 2014
Curtailing Prosperity
Unable to get his proposals passed through Congress and against the will of the American people, who view climate change among the least important issues, President Obama on Tuesday announced a series of executive actions to combat Global Climate Change.
As reported by Jim Hoft at Gateway Pundit, Obama ordered all federal agencies to begin factoring “climate resilience” into all of their international development programs and investments. The action is expected to complement efforts by the federal government to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, according to the White House.
Global Climate Change (GCC), formerly Global Warming but with a new name due to cooling temps across the globe, may well be the biggest hoax of all time, inclusive of tulip value in Holland in the 1600's.
GCC serves as a vehicle to reduce sovereignty, and transfer wealth on a global scale. The sanctions placed on US corporations, which are not followed by other countries such as China, restrict commerce, limit production and increase costs of generating product.
If you think America stole her wealth on the backs of other less wealthy counties, utilizing a mechanism such as GCC to serve as a governor on America while collecting and transferring wealth to less productive countries, is a dream come true.
And it is coming true, as with the media along for the ride, the ill informed American citizen has no idea of the macroecomic issues plaguing the generation of prosperity for Uncle Sam.
America is indeed being transformed.
Obama finds our Constitution a flawed document; "a charter of negative liberties, which says what the states can’t do to you, what the Federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf.”
Limited by the Constitution and faced with defeat from Congress and SCOTUS, he will go it alone.
President Obama, curtailing prosperity.
Unlawfully to be sure.
As reported by Jim Hoft at Gateway Pundit, Obama ordered all federal agencies to begin factoring “climate resilience” into all of their international development programs and investments. The action is expected to complement efforts by the federal government to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, according to the White House.
Global Climate Change (GCC), formerly Global Warming but with a new name due to cooling temps across the globe, may well be the biggest hoax of all time, inclusive of tulip value in Holland in the 1600's.
GCC serves as a vehicle to reduce sovereignty, and transfer wealth on a global scale. The sanctions placed on US corporations, which are not followed by other countries such as China, restrict commerce, limit production and increase costs of generating product.
If you think America stole her wealth on the backs of other less wealthy counties, utilizing a mechanism such as GCC to serve as a governor on America while collecting and transferring wealth to less productive countries, is a dream come true.
And it is coming true, as with the media along for the ride, the ill informed American citizen has no idea of the macroecomic issues plaguing the generation of prosperity for Uncle Sam.
America is indeed being transformed.
Obama finds our Constitution a flawed document; "a charter of negative liberties, which says what the states can’t do to you, what the Federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf.”
Limited by the Constitution and faced with defeat from Congress and SCOTUS, he will go it alone.
President Obama, curtailing prosperity.
Unlawfully to be sure.
 |
| McNaughtonart.com |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
