Surrender

With SONY Pictures in full capitulation, and the Obama administration seemingly out to lunch, as Michael Ramirez of Investors Business Daily so accurately points out, a deeply troubling precedent is being set.

Michael Ramirez/Investors Business Daily

Not only are the cyber attacks of great concern, but the diplomatic ground being given up for no apparent reason by President Obama will cause untold damage for decades.

With his transformation fully engaged, Obama has done his best to alienate our friends and allies while extending overtures, if not prostituting the US, to long held enemies.

North Korea, thought by some to be responsible for the cyber attack on SONY but more likely a smokescreen for the truth, is moving forward quickly without hindrance in building their own nuclear weapon. Russia has been given more flexibility by BHO after his election win, and Obama has helped pave the way for the caliphate whose goal is the emergence of a greater Syria similar to the old Ottoman Empire. ISIS and the Taliban are running roughshod, killing women and children, with part of their army prisoners the BHO released.  Obama has reached out to Iran, also building a nuclear weapon, and Mexico and Cuba have had steps taken by Obama to redistribute our wealth to them.

It is really astonishing, and our elected officials are either on board or doing little if nothing to stop it, outside of about 20 in the GOP.

If you did not know any better, you would think President Obama is in process of surrendering US sovereignty to the world, perhaps ultimately governed by The United Nations, an organization Obama could well see himself running in approximately two years.

Perhaps he is.

Pieces Are Being Placed

As reported by FOX News, filmmaker Dinesh D'Souza was sentenced on two weeks ago Tuesday to five years of probation, a $30,000 fine, and eight months in a San Diego “community confinement center” where he will undergo “therapeutic counseling.”  No doubt, the ghost of Saul Alinsky will be acting counselor.

The reason we refer to D'Souza is because like few others, he has a clear understanding of who President Obama really is, what motivates him and what goals he has worked on at implementing during his presidency.  Time has found D'Souza to be most accurate, perhaps most notably the anti-Colonialism stance Obama inherited from his father and champions somewhat clandestinely. 

Why is this important at this juncture in time?  I am not sure you want to know.

Remember when President Obama returned the bust of Churchill, a gift to The White House, to Great Britain?  This action was not accidental or an error in judgement; this action was born out of a deep resentment, part of Obama's detest of the Colonialist policies of the England and France.

Behind that backdrop, Obama has, in reluctance, began bombing targets housing the lethal terrorist group ISIS, or ISIL, in Syria.  Sounds good, as we need to kill these representatives of evil in prompt fashion.

As NewsMax reported, President Barack Obama said Thursday's Senate vote to approve funding to train and equip Syrian rebels shows that Americans are united in fighting the Islamic State (ISIS).  The votes provides funding to train Syrian rebels, who may or may not be ready to take on ISIS.

Glenn Beck proposed the Obama administration is utilizing the ISIS threat to arm rebels whose ultimate goal is to overthrow Assad.  On the surface, toppling Assad, who is not a good guy, may be a reasonable objective, but their real story is real alarming.  Take a few moments to listen to Beck and his thoughts:



After absorbing this information for a few days, coupled with some investigation and study, the premise presented by Beck is deemed most credible. Beck was among the first, if not the only, to describe the goal of a caliphate in the middle east, and that is exactly where we are heading. 

I did not specifically recall the Sykes-Picot agreement. Essentially the old Ottoman Empire, the last time the Arab world had a united Islamic state led by a religious leader as Beck points out, was divided up into provinces or states that were to be under British and French control and influence to control and grow safe shipping lanes.  It was part of the agreement, however, where negotiated promises of the emergence of a kingdom united called Greater Syria failed to materialize, and this has led to Arab factions, enraged at being slighted, attempting seize control over the area to once again establish a single nation of under Islam; a caliphate.

Most of these groups are what we could consider to be terrorist in nature.  Those deemed non-believers who refuse to convert, are not given an opportunity to co-exist, but are labeled infidels and are most often killed.

Under the Obama administration, an objective of toppling dictators in this region opens up the avenues for upstart factions to effort to seize control and reach the goal of establishing the caliphate; a Greater Syria under the control of an Islamic religious leader.  Chaos has been the result thus far, not withstanding all the propaganda stating otherwise.  The events in Egypt are notably worth recalling.

Should a caliphate be established in the region, along the map of the old Ottoman Empire; if those in control operated without opposition this area, if not challenged, the mapping would not include Israel. Keep in mind there is little doubt of the hostility Obama holds toward Israel, and the Colonial powers of Great Britain and France. 

For those living under a tree, please be advised that Obama does not hold Uncle Sam in high regard either, having vowed to transform our nation, a nation he had noted is "based on a a charter of negative liberties, which says what the states can’t do to you, what the Federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf."

Define that as Obama finding America an oppressor nation, and although the premise is false, he aims to direct her transformation through efforts at level the playing field. 

Rather than misleading rhetoric, action dictates the marketplace, and Obama has had America orchestrate much of this mid east turnover and chaos, and turned a blind eye at a minimum to actions of countries and groups historically viewed as our enemies.

Last year, Obama spoke to the nation detailing how we must strike Syria and Assad as evidence pointed to their utilization of chemical weapons on their own people.  As it turns out, I believe, that was an orchestrated event hoping to win the minds of the American people and giving Obama the green light to take out Assad and open up Syria for the merchants of radical Islam.

Nobody bought it, and the imminent action failed to take place. The media failed to exhibit an ounce of intellectual curiosity as we quietly failed to take what would have been considered a seemingly appropriate action.

ISIS is now running roughshod over Iraq, having seized large tracts of territory, cash and our own abandoned military equipment, and they must be stopped.

Now, it does not seem our military has been specifically tasked with the destruction of ISIS ( is that not what you thought Obama finally engaged our forces to do? ), but rather to assist Syrian rebels who aim the overthrow of Bashar a-Assad. 

As Obama says, Assad must go. No, Mr. President, actually, ISIS must go.

Something is very wrong with this whole situation, and I fear many members of Congress are not up to speed with the historical significance of the Sykes-Picot agreement and I was not either, but thanks to the presentation by Glenn Beck and some research, it seems to all be alarmingly pieced together.

At one point just prior to Obama's regrettable election, we had the head of snake, Iran, in large measure surrounded.  Do you remember playing RISK?  Surrounding your enemy is good.

Now, under Obama's leadership, we are enabling enemies of state, arming terrorist organizations and helping to create the chaos necessary to fuel the flames of insurgency for those seeking freedom to overthrow vicious dictators, all of which escalates the power Iran yields.

You may think overturning these dictators is a worthy endeavor, and in many ways it is.  However, you must consider the ultimate objectives of the not only the fighters on the field, but those who organize their efforts.

As our Commander in Chief, we have the top dog in organization, but just what is he organizing?  It sure looks like a Greater Syria, where a united Islamic state can be once again ruled by a religious leader. In a sense, the Obama administration policies and ISIS have much the same goal, just approached in differing ways.

I do not have it all pieced together, but, although we are not playing RISK, I can recognize pieces are being placed.

Yeah, something is very wrong to be sure, and it is not workplace violence.

The Joke Is On US

On an evening a couple of weeks back, President Obama spoke to nation regarding the terrorist group ISIS running roughshod over most of Iraq from their apparent bases in Syria. ISIS is a major concern to most knowledgeable Americans, and the speech by Obama was of keen interest.

You might think this would be a tough speech for Obama, who although vehemently opposed to US military interaction, faces few if any alternatives than to use our armed forces to stop this legitimate threat to peace across the globe.  In addition, it has been Obama who has arrogantly informed us that he kept his promise by leaving Iraq and decimating al Qaeda.

Yes, I am aware ISIS is a direct offshoot of al Qaeda, the group the administration boasted about dismantling.  Like most everything else from the White House; nothing but propaganda.

Speaking of that, the speech opened up, not with commentary on the rising threat of evil we are facing, but a couple of minutes on how his policies has strengthened our economy, created more jobs than any recent administration and expanded opportunities for working class families. A complete fabrication of the truth.

If that was not insulting enough, Obama delivered a few moments of commentary in his routine condescending manner that Islam is not in any way a root of this problem, rather a peaceful religion we as Americans should embrace as part of our national fabric.  I wish I were joking.

Actually, the joke is on us.

Obama has had it wrong from the get go, and if as James Madison told us, Americans were armed with knowledge, this transformative dovish narcissistic neophyte would have never been elected once, much less, twice.

The US interaction with Iraq, both times, was regrettably the correct course of action.  Under the surge, we gained victory in Iraq and gave their people a shot at establishing a sovereign nation of freedom.  They needed continued support, but under Obama, after telegraphing a timetable, he directed our premature departure, snatching defeat from victory.

Without the presence of the US in the region, the opportunity for al Qaeda to resurface was presented.

The actions taking place in the region were predictable, and President Bush informed the nation what we would be in store for if we departed the region prematurely.  Take a listen:


Bush was ridiculed (that Alinsky technique is omnipresent is it not ) relentlessly, but he was absolutely correct.  You just heard the evidence.

Come to think of it, looking back at the scorecard, although the media delivers propaganda to the contrary, Obama fails miserably to GOP leaders on the issue of foreign policy.  Here are three significant examples.

The laughing stock of all progressive land, it turns out Sarah Palin accurately predicted that Obama would implement policies which would project weakness and create an environment in which Russia would consider invading the Ukraine.  Bingo.

Way prior to the current activities surrounding ISIS, the US Military has suffered more deaths in Afghanistan under Obama than under George Bush. There is no daily count on CNN, and Cindy Sheehan is not protesting at various gold communities across the fruited plain, but those facts continue to be stubborn.

During the last presidential campaign, VP Joe Biden tried to scare everybody that if Romney was elected, he would bomb Syria, something Obama would never do.  Until now.

Also during the last presidential campaign, Obama failed to identify Russia as an enemy, degrading Mitt Romney, who said Russia was "without question our number one geopolitical foe" by saying the 1980's called and want their foreign policy back.  Idiot at large, that Obama.

This all would be a Saturday Night Live skit if these issues were not deadly serious, pun intended. If Obama continues to play games and does not get serious about the increasing evils we face, sooner than later, our way of life will be threatened.

I pray our nation remains safe, but should an attack occur,  you will know exactly what enemies to blame; foreign and domestic. No Joke.

Organizational Deception

Is bombing ISIS in Syria "just some part of an organizing the Arab world adventure" asks Glenn Beck. Sure looks like it. If we have placed a stranglehold on their income streams ( oil ) I missed it.  Obama reluctantly engaged in this process, seemingly designed more for toppling Assad in Syria rather than crushing ISIS.

Pay attention to actions, not rhetoric.  The organizational deception underway stretches the mind, and is very troubling to say the least.

Deliberate Decline of America

Despite the propaganda performance of a lifetime upcoming with President Obama addressing the nation in a speech being revised by the moment following a series of bizarre and absurd developments, Obama and his administration have been abysmal in their international relations efforts.

This group of romper room players, full of lies and deceit, set to implement the transformation of the United States of America, need to be publicly spanked. Thankfully, there is no shortage of those willing to speak truth to power.

First, enjoy another blistering essay by FOX News Justice Jeanine Pirro:




OUCH!

Conrad Black wrote a depressing editorial in the Washington Sun which all too clearly illustrates the Collapse of American Influence.  Black astutely commented; "Not since the disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1991, and before that the fall of France in 1940, has there been so swift an erosion of the world influence of a Great Power as we are witnessing with the United States."

Rush Limbaugh highlighted two outstanding editorial pieces in recent days that require your attention.

Norman Podhoretz offered an important editorial making a case we have sadly been making for several years, that what appears to be incompetence by President Obama and his staff is no such thing.  Rather, it is an orchestrated policy implemented to "turn this country into as close a replica of the social-democratic countries of Europe as the constraints of our political system allowed", with the Cloward and Piven strategy the blueprint.

The destructive behavior by this administration is beyond troubling, and for our brave soldiers, "My Military" as the President called them, to be utilized as political pawns is sickening.  War is serious business, and should be left the professionals.

The foreign policy of the administration has resulted in death and ruin across the middle east, and with any luck after this mind boggling debacle in Syria, one which potentially cost America her superpower status, the American people will wake to recognize just how dangerous our Commander in Control really is.

These important essays will provide you a descriptive primer as you prepare for the propaganda performance of a lifetime when Obama addresses the nation this evening.  While it may seem like Syria is over after tonight, nothing could be further from the truth.

Deflect the Distraction; Defund Obamacare

Although, through obfuscation, lies and misrepresentation, the left has seemingly succeeded in discrediting Sarah Palin in the minds of the low information and pop culture voting base, it cannot hide the truth for those who seek it.

Among the many topics on which Palin has always been spot on has been Obamacare, an abomination few have actually read which gives the government unprecedented and dangerous control over the citizenry. Right out of the gate, she correctly assessed the death panels, for which she was called uniformed by many who after the dust has settled admit she was correct.

In full disclosure, I attempted to read the bill, but time did not allow me the opportunity to backtrack in reading the other tree killing bills referenced throughout the some 2700 pages.  Furthermore, the phrase "as the Secretary shall determine" left a mind boggling amount of open ended options which prohibit one from actually nailing down what actions will ultimately take place.

A bureaucrat making life decisions for the American citizenry, defined or not, is a reduction in freedom that is unacceptable.

There is an effort, perhaps the only remaining opportunity to stop this encroachment on freedom, by Senators Mike Lee, R:UT, and Ted Cruz, R:TX, to defund Obamacare. Sadly, many in the GOP have refrained form joining in the fight, and we are taking names.

Just as Lee and Cruz are getting rolling, out of nowhere the Obama administration conjures up the immediate necessity to engage in a military strike against Syria.  The greater majority of America is somewhat confused why this is immediately critical, particularly since the peril has not affected Obama addressing, not the nation, but his Titleist on the long par 4 on the golf course.

Palin accurately finds the "foreign fiasco" a distraction, and encourages those who aim to protect freedom to "get back to work" and "bomb Obamacare".  Palin is correct yet again.

If you recall, the Obama administration never wants a crisis to go to waste, and some folks getting killed over in Syria is certainly no exception.  Distortion, distraction and delay are common tactics employed by the administration, as it is all about them achieving their goal by any means necessary.

For those who wish to thwart Obamacare, the time is now, and we must deflect the noise and hear Sarah Palin.  Please join Senators Lee and Cruz and get on board in effort to defund Obamacare.

Just sayin'.

Liars Lack Credibility

President Obama; Commander Clueless At Large

"My credibility is not on the line," quipped President Obama today regarding his red line he never spoke of regarding the use of chemical weapons in Syria.

Problem is, Obama has no credibility. 

"The international community’s credibility is on the line. And America’s and Congress’s credibility is on the line."

In response to appearing most weak, Obama throws the international community under the bus for attempting to set a level of standards in times of conflict that adhere to common decency and follows by hammering the Congress for being part of such an agreement.

The comments are really an effort to discredit Republicans and the use of force by those countries able to successfully conduct military operations.  Only when the administration find the international community has the "responsibility to protect" would military action seem appropriate.

From the beginning of Obama's administration and his apology tour, there has not been an international relations plan anyone can make sense of.  The Arab Spring was a disaster everyone but he and his staff saw in the making, and the orchestrated events in Lybia has moved the country into lawlessness and ruin and has resulted in Egypt in turmoil.

Furthermore, truth and the adherence to the rule of law have been absent, a critical matter of trust.  One could surmise the administration has been less than forthcoming, but the fact of the matter is those the are charged to report to are left facing distortion, stonewalling, mistruths and deception.

This would include negotiations surrounding the auto bailouts, Fast and Furious, the stimulus, the unemployment rate, the NSA scandal, the IRS scandal and most notably, the events in Benghazi where four patriots, including our Ambassador, were murdered.

The administration is not credible, and Rep. Jeff Duncan, R:SC, made the charge while grilling Secretary of State John Kerry, who is an appalling individual, lacking character and credibility, who although serving in, has exhibited great disdain for our military over the years.


I have no access to any military intelligence and can only speculate on the real story from what I can ascertain from following the events, deciphering what I can from media reports and hearing testimonials.  But, it seems clear chemical weapons were utilized in Syria.

However, in my opinion, there are a myriad of outstanding questions that must be addressed before we risk the lives of our servicemen.   Primarily due to the mind boggling foreign policy of this administration, this situation has really become one were neither side, either the administration of Bashar al-Assad or the rebels made up of factions of Al-Queda and the Muslim Brotherhood,   deserves any support from Uncle Sam.

Interestingly enough, we apparently know the issues in Syria like the palm of our hand but were paralyzed at the time and remain quite puzzled at what transpired in Benghazi.  We actually thought is was because of a video.  I don't buy it, and nor should you.

Going against Assad, as Obama is asking Congress for approval in doing, puts us on the side with the Muslim Brotherhood and factions of Al-Queda, both of whom I consider our enemies.  Problem is, I doubt President Obama considers agrees. As Sen. Ted Cruz, R:TX, said, "we should not be “al-Qaeda’s air force."

The entire operation has come about quickly for some reason, with somewhat of a sense of urgency.  I wonder why, but then again, there is golf, fundraising and world travel going on.

The case is weak, and we are asked by the same hypocrites who railed against George W. Bush, who had a library of info compared to Kerry's briefcase, to seemingly blindly accept their premise and jump on board. 

No such luck with me.  It is noted many seemingly knowledgeable people have, including Jennifer Rubin over at The Washington Post.

We should not tolerate the use of chemical weapons and there may be some additional reasons to be involved, but we have not been informed of what they may be. I got some ideas, coming up in a later post.

Certainly, I am not against military action when necessary, provided we go kick the ass out of our opponent and come home. For us to engage, there must be a strategic plan of action, rather than a rushed effort with no stated goal or end game.

In my view, the administration has presented themselves as liars ( perpetrators apprehended and punished in Benghazi?) and thieves (monetizing of the debt), misrepresenting and distorting facts ( no red line drawn).  They are not to be trusted, and get no quarter from me.

Obama thinks he is loved from the night sky to the ocean floor, but only he and a few remaining Obamabots still think that. The truth of the matter is, that other than attempting to save what limited credibility Obama and the US still clings to on the world stage, there is no strategic US interest or reason to be involving ourselves, and placing at risk the treasure of our servicemen and women, in yet another middle east skirmish, particularly with no strategic plan.

Overdrive Turn For Bachmann

I have often heard former Florida Congressman Lou Frey say a day in politics is a lifetime, and nothing could be further from the truth.

Last week, Representative Michele Bachmann, R:MN, announced she would not seek to retain her congressional seat in 2014, citing her belief in term limits.  Needless to say, for those of us who champion the rule of law and our founding principles, the loss of Bachmann and her strong voice will leave a significant void.

Jim Graves, who Bachmann narrowly defeated in 2012, not to be confused as a statesman, responded with a few digs directed at Bachmann.  Graves effort at ridicule and divisiveness brings to mind those progressive tactics of Sal Alinsnky. Stay classy there Jim.

In the article of propaganda for Graves, The Huffington Post presented approximately 20 slides hammering Bachmann for various positions over the years, thinking they were exposing weaknesses. As usual with these hit jobs, somewhere along the way the truth got lost, as a review of these slides give indication how correct the assessments of Bachmann are.  Although I am intrigued by the opportunity to tackle each one individually here, I will cite two that should be illustrative.

In slide six, Bachmann labels the tax code as a weapon of mass destruction.  Does any body remain unconvinced the administration is not restricting commerce and punishing opponents through the tax code? In slide eight, Bachmann warns back in March of 2011 of the Obama administration being a "gangster government." "I don't take back my statements on gangster government," she said, referring to a charge she made during the debate over health care reform. "I think that there have been actions taken by the government that are corrupt."  Oh my gosh was that exponentially correct.

Just six months ago, reports had Bachmann prepared to challenge a weakened John Boehner, R:OH, for the speakership. Oh, what a difference a couple of months makes.

Bachmann, a Tea Party favorite, has had a bullseye on her back for quite some time, sadly from both sides of the aisle.  While the left attempted to discredit her a a moonbat, that line of attack only gained traction for the thousands of faithful MSNBC viewers.

It was attacks from the moderate republican camp that really made it tough for Bachmann.  We have presented many posts about Bachmann efforting to question the levels of infiltration of the Muslim Brotherhood and their operatives within our government.  Those inquiries drew the ire of GOP leaders Lindsay Graham and John McCain, not to mention John Boehner. 

Recently, even Karl Rove took some shots at Bachmann, although he was incorrect in his assessment, which is becoming all too frequent.

Bachmann was correct in asking these questions, and given the intense level of attack in response that came her way, it would not be difficult to conclude she hit a significant nerve.  Hey, wasn't John McCain just over in Syria hanging out with these folks?

The left was employing a tactic previously used to attack Sarah Palin, in the form of filing a series of complaints about about campaign finance.  Ultimately, these accusations and complaints result in no findings; however, the monetary expenses and time and opportunity costs in defense of these accusations are substantial. 

Look closely, as an examination of the IRS actions paint a similar picture of efforting to intimidate and punish punatively political opponents.

Bachmann was always a champion of free market capitalism, and had a complete handle on the economic issues confronting Uncle Sam. In addition, she had and has keen insight on the issues surrounding the global war on terrorism.

It is sad Bachmann will relinquish her position in the fight for freedom, and one can only hope she will reposition herself in another arena to help us in the fight to save America.  Bachmann is a fighter whose voice we need in the fight for freedom we find ourselves engaged in, so I expect we have not heard the last from her.

The Discrediting of America: Individual Opponents

While President Obama is the face of the Progressive advancement running roughshod over America, there is a well funded massive machine of operatives implementing widespread attacks on those, organizations, corporations and individuals, who stand against their policies. With a basis found in the pages of Saul Alinsky's Rules For Radicals, aiming to demonize, ridicule and discredit all in opposition, there are no lines that cannot be crossed as the ends justify the means. The tentacles of these ongoing operations extend beyond your wildest imagination. Therefore, BAHL Revere will engage a series of posts alerting our readership of instances in this regard titled The Discrediting of America.

CPAC 2013 was quite exciting, with a host of speakers giving excellent speeches, quite cognizant of an America in decline.with most zeroed in the parties responsible.

Among the speakers who minced no words in assessing blame for the transformation of wealth overwhelming America with those orchestrating the destruction failing to practice the austerity measures they advise us to take, was Rep. Michele Bachmann, (R:MN).

Bachmann torched Obama for living a lavish lifestyle as President while most of us are struggling for friction in an Obama led economy wrecked by crony capitalism, destructive FED policies, absence of the rule of law, rewards for irresponsible behavior and an advancing nanny state robbing people of their identity.

See a portion of the speech by Bachmann below:

Although Bachmann did embellish some points, for example, the walking of the dog, the premise of the comments cannot be legitimately challenged.  Do I have a reader who honestly does not think Obama is exceeding common guidelines with respect to living in excess as President?  In addition, do any not see the hypocrisy of him sparing no expense vacationing and golfing while most of us are struggling mightily in the dismal economy he is presiding over?

In my career, I have noticed great leaders provide an example for those they command or lead by establishing a code of behavior and work ethic.  For crying out loud, the president and first lady take separate planes on vacation, something we previously found obscene.  A respected leader would not close tours of The White House to gain political points while his family vacations touring the world.

Meet President Obama.

Bachmann has been hit hard in the aftermath of these comments, by both sides.  CNN correspondent Dana Bash ambushed Bachmann in a parking lot.  Mind you, Bash, who would not know a Fulton county commission meeting if it was held in the CNN parking lot, cannot find time to chase the Obama administration down on anything, but was in high speed pursuit of Bachmann.

From the supposed right, Bill O'Reilly led the way, hammering Bachmann on is FOX program "The O'Reilly Factor.  Please take a listen to O'Reilly below:

O'Reilly is off the mark, which is unfortunately more common than you may think.  I was not the only one who noticed, as The Great One Mark Levin let O'Reilly have it on his nationally syndicated radio show.  Listen to Levin HERE.

On Monday, we learned Bachmann is now the center on an ethics investigation for the misuse of campaign funds.  The Blaze reports that Federal investigators are now interviewing former Bachmann campaign staffers nationwide about alleged intentional campaign-finance violations.  Would these be the same disgruntled former staff members fired for poorly leading her 2012 presidential campaign?

But this is not the point, as everyone who remains sane recognizes that President Obama gives no consideration to the money he spends as President, or as Commander in Chief in running up the national debt, and that an upstart investigation focusing on former staff members has the earmark of a witch hunt.

Most on the left think Bachmann is a dingbat, so why all the long knives?  We have hit this topic previously, and make no mistake about it; Bachmann is being targeted for her having been an outspoken opponent of our coziness with the Muslim Brotherhood.

Once Bachmann publicly questioned our policy toward the Muslim Brotherhood, she has been in the cross hairs.  From John McCain to Bill O'Reilly on the right, to the entire roster of lefties, Bachmann must be taken down and discredited publicly before someone takes her seriously.  You see, she is being hit with propaganda portraying her as discredited.  Restated with an Orwellian flare, just like two plus two equals five, what you see presented about her are the opposite of the facts.

Bachmann was correct in the facts regarding the Muslim Brotherhood and their infiltration of our government by many who advocate for them in the shadows.  Recently, we have confirmed John Brennan to head the CIA and Chuck Hagel as Secretary of Defense, who are sympathetic at best to these opponents of Israel. John Kerry, our new Secretary of State, has supporters on both sides of the aisle, even though he is a fierce opponent of our military having protested against them on many an occasion.

The Muslim Brotherhood has taken over in Egypt, and is positioning themselves in Syria. Benghazi, who is not a WalMart greeter but rather the location where Ambassador Stevens and three other patriots were left hanging to be murdered by the Obama administration, is presumed to have been the location for gun running negotiations where guns were being run through Turkey to the Syrian rebels, who are really the Muslim Brotherhood.  For more on the gun running, see the following Gateway Pundit article.

Don't we usually demand a full investigation, especially under the most transparent administration ever, when our Ambassador get killed?  Then why are we silencing witnesses?

As we have noted, Bachmann is correct on this and we encourage you to support her in any way possible.   Don't be distracted by all the noise surrounding and ridicule of Bachmann, just know that the reason she is being targeted is because she is asking questions the administration does not want to answer.  Efforts to discredit Bachmann have failed thus far, so the progressives are stepping up their game.

Bachmann indeed must be on to something.

Middle East Web of Weaponry

At this moment, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta says signs point to Syria using weapons of mass destruction, in this case chemical weapons, on their own people. The uprising in Syria, in large measure, has been regrettably aided by The United States in levels extending beyond appeasement.

Larry Kudlow of CNBC chats with John Batchelor on the Syrian crisis.



Starting with speeches around the world proclaiming the transgressions of America, President Obama set out to right these perceived wrongs. As part of this effort, Obama implemented uprisings in the middle east, toppling enemies we knew for those unknown, as least by most. Although Obama spoke publicly about the enhanced chances for democracy and freedom, Obama privately knew those positioned to fill the vacuum, the Muslim Brotherhood, would advocate, or install by force, Shari-ah Law, as is currently the case in Egypt.

But let us regress. Although Syria has a weapons program, are the majority of the weapons of mass destruction currently possessed by Syria the same weapons we never found in Iraq?

Indeed they are.

No longer politically expedient to admonish George W. Bush for going to war with Iraq on false assumptions of the existence of these weapons, it should come as no surprise that stories shining light on the weapons transfer from Iraq to Syria are emerging in frequency. While many reports are discussing recently discovered pathways of weapon movement from Iraq to Syria, hidden behind the discussion is the transfer during the postponement of the invasion of Iraq that France President Jacque Chirac, a dishonest broker who worked against US interests, bought.

The second to none editorial page of Investors Business Daily leads the way as usual in presenting and detailing the truth. IBD, in an editorial yesterday, continues to present the facts even if few Americans are willing to absorb it.

Although I remain incensed regarding the antics used by the opponents of President Bush, most notably regarding the propaganda regrading the weapons, the discussion pales in comparison to what is happening now.

Benghazi, who most Americans think is some folk singer, should have been a story that would detonate and destroy the Obama administration.  There was supposed to be a presser by a handful of Republicans, however, these GOP members snatched defeat from the jaws of victory as they did not want to seem as playing politics and not caring for the victims as super storm Sandy slapped the northeast.

However, the events in Benghazi supersede politics. Four Americans, including our Ambassador to Egypt and two NAVY Seals, were murdered. The Ambassador, and the Seals, requested help on various occasions but were turned down.  Although many have called out Obama on this horrendous act of war against the Untied States, perhaps the commentary by Jeanine Piro on FOX News Channel hit him the hardest, and appropriately so.

As previously noted on the blog, Ambassador Stevens, who inexplicably was meeting with a Turkish contact in a dangerous area outside of our embassy, is thought to have been working to secure weapons.  The weapons Stephens is thought to have been attempting to corral are weapons the United States, under Obama, had been supplying rebels in Egypt and Libya.

Recent reports, including from The New York Times, give confirmation of the central theme of the story, which is gun running by the Obama administration.  Although not an optimal source, some strong information on this subject can be found over at blog site Lame Cherry.  Regrettably, these weapons have gotten loose and have fallen into hands of those who aim America harm. Imagine that.

Although the issues surrounding Benghazi, in which a US Ambassador was murdered for the first time in over 30 years and an administration appears to be running guns seemingly without Congressional approval, seems to be a story which would dwarf Watergate, apparently no journalists are interested in winning a Pulitzer Prize.

On the heels of winning the election, the Obama administration is embolden by a new found sense of arrogance.  With a complicit media in their hip pocket, why should they worry?  What could happen with some weapons, perhaps some of mass destruction, loose in the hands of Al-Queda, Hamas or other groups or countries who wish us harm?

Well, take a listen to Dennis Kucinich (D:OH), of all people, who is asking some very alarming questions and not getting any answers:



This was a debate needed at the time in 2011, and one critically needed right now.  Kucinich rhetorically asked who should be held accountable, and the answer is President Obama.

Unfortunately, the media is criminally negligent in coverage of the Obama administration.  The Democrats are in support of the actions of Obama, as are the Progressives in both parties, who have been working toward reducing the superpower status of the US for quite some time.  The GOP members in strong opposition are few in numbers and fearful of being labeled an extremist.  See Rep. Allen West, (R:FL).

It is far time for someone to step forward, and take on those in power.

This type of thing used to be a big deal, for I recall missing General Hospital for days on end while a Congressional panel hammered Col. Oliver North.  However, while America wonders who is on the next Dancing With The Stars cast and enjoying the ever expanding entitlements coming their way, lies are being presented as truth, unrecognizable to the "low information voters" who re-elected Obama.

I hope and pray America, and the media, wake up before a catastrophic tragedy occurs.  While the likelihood of such en event favors a financial issue, that may be welcomed against the possibility of a weapon of mass destruction altering life in America forever.

Should such an event occur, while Kucinich wonders whose fault it would be, I would have no doubt who to hold to accountability.