Dishonest Broker

Two of our Favorite Truth Tellers Engage

Two of our favorite truth tellers engage, as Dinesh D'Souza and Sonnie Johnson discuss who the real racists are, their long history and the myth of them being the friend of minorities.

History has been changed, and few seem able to recall or are even aware that the Klu Klux Klan was simply a militant wing of the Democratic Party. In many ways, Black Lives Matter is somewhat similar to the KKK; created by the Democrats to disrupt and tile the black community.

Dinesh D'Souza, who chronicles much of this in his movie hillarysamericathemovie.com, joins Sonnie Johnson, a huge admirer of Booker T. Washington and an exceptional advocate for peace and fellowship for all people while aiming to advance the black community.

Take a listen to this very telling discussion.

In Honor of the Ultimate Price for Freedom

When thinking of Memorial Day, President Reagan offered appropriate commentary during his inaugural address to the citizens of The United States of America:

"As for the enemies of freedom, those who are potential adversaries, they will be reminded that peace is the highest aspiration of the American people. We will negotiate for it, sacrifice for it; we will not surrender for it, now or ever. We are Americans!"

Those that gave all, paid with the ultimate sacrifice, will never be forgotten. Our deepest thanks to all for your sacrifice and we honor of Those that we miss.

A quote today presented by Dinesh D'Souza needed no accompaniment:

How inadequate our words are to convey what these men did so that we can remain safe, prosperous, and free!

Thank You and God Bless you all!  #NeverForgotten

Enemies Within

If it were not so deadly serious, it would be comical to witness the Obama administration stumbling around calling the Radical Islamic terrorists anything but what they are, murderous thugs who seek to kill every infidel Christian in the world while perverting religion for worldwide conquest.  But as heads continue to be chopped off, it is not those terrorists Obama is hell bent on stopping.  It is his political opponents, as Investors Business Daily's Michael Ramirez so brilliantly pointed out, the GOP and especially those who consider themselves Tea Party members.

Michael Ramirez/IBD

World War II was won in approximately five years, yet we have entered our fifteenth year of fighting these Radical Islamic terrorists.  George W. Bush seemed handicapped in doing so by making effort to appease the slew of moderates, along with the entire left wing, who grew tired of combat after being bombarded with propaganda from the mainstream media. Rules of engagement increased the degree of difficulty for our soldiers in the fight, and after we achieved victory, an election squandered it all.

A war weary electorate voted in President Obama, who proclaimed he would end both of the "ill-advised" wars the US was involved in, slamming Bush at every opportunity. Notice Obama said "end" the wars; he did not utter a word about winning, or victory.  But why?

Obama does not want to defeat these folks; in fact, he is on their team. Obama wrote in his book Audacity of Hope that “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction". Come again?

For those who do not really know who Obama is, this comes off as some sort of taken out of context comment.  But it is far from it.  Throughout his terms in office, Obama has been cold to our longtime allies and has had en empathetic tone engaging in bridge building with our enemies, who hate us now more than ever. 

As Dinesh D'Souza so brilliantly pointed out in his move "America", Obama is an anti-Colonialist who has disdain for America, but particularly England ( immediately upon being elected returned bust of Churchill given to the US after 9-11) and France ( did Obama attend the peace rally last month? ) due his perception they mistreated and stole wealth from other countries in the region.  Obama's father held strong beliefs along this line, and "Dreams From My Father" was not just a catchy title.  It was the truth.

Obama is seeking a greater Syria, a re-establishment of the Ottoman Empire, allowing a Muslim territory to gain immense power in the region; a power to rival America. As president, actions undertaken by Obama have made America much weaker on the world stage; a transfer of economic wealth and military power.  In addition, like the majority of the region, Obama holds a deep loathing of Israel, easily evidenced by his actions toward one of our dearest allies.

While most responsible world powers grow increasingly concerned about unstable player Iran, who I consider the head of the snake in the region, obtaining nuclear power,  Obama has not made any effort to thwart the Iranian effort.  To the contrary, without a Congress willing to take him on, he has donated heavily to Iran with taxpayer money we do not have.

Obama chief of staff Valerie Jarrett, an un-elected person with enormous power, has plainly stated her objective, but few if anyone took her seriously. Obama takes her very seriously; so should you.

ISIS is running roughshod, just recently burning a Jordanian prisoner alive.  Their objectives have been clearly stated, and they have unleashed slaughter and terror across the region with little or no tangible evidence Obama has done anything about it.  He angrily refuses to even acknowledge who the enemy really is; which is Radical Islam for our low information readers.

Doing nothing about this historic advance of terror is one thing, but as FOX News Kimberly Guilfoyle so appropriately ponders, "Why is our president resupplying terrorists?"

Certainly, anyone on the side of the red, white and blue would never release top level terrorist prisoners during the fight, but Obama has on many occasion.  Back in my day, and I am no old codger, this would be defined as high treason.  Why Congress refuses to seek the immediate impeachment of our commander in chaos I find troubling.

Dinesh D'souza tweeted today that someone asked him "Would you call Obama the worst American president or the first anti-American president?"  Well, that is some question, is it not?

For those who wondered about what the characteristics of the transformation of America might look like, perhaps you can now see.  Obama seeks to diminish America and our colonial partners in punitive fashion on the world stage while fostering an advancement of the Muslim faith, open borders and Marxism throughout the world.  The evidence is overwhelming and on full display, and I conclude his is indeed the first ant-American president; an enemy within.

Meanwhile, evil is looming large on the landscape, and it must be promptly and thoroughly defeated.

Pieces Are Being Placed

As reported by FOX News, filmmaker Dinesh D'Souza was sentenced on two weeks ago Tuesday to five years of probation, a $30,000 fine, and eight months in a San Diego “community confinement center” where he will undergo “therapeutic counseling.”  No doubt, the ghost of Saul Alinsky will be acting counselor.

The reason we refer to D'Souza is because like few others, he has a clear understanding of who President Obama really is, what motivates him and what goals he has worked on at implementing during his presidency.  Time has found D'Souza to be most accurate, perhaps most notably the anti-Colonialism stance Obama inherited from his father and champions somewhat clandestinely. 

Why is this important at this juncture in time?  I am not sure you want to know.

Remember when President Obama returned the bust of Churchill, a gift to The White House, to Great Britain?  This action was not accidental or an error in judgement; this action was born out of a deep resentment, part of Obama's detest of the Colonialist policies of the England and France.

Behind that backdrop, Obama has, in reluctance, began bombing targets housing the lethal terrorist group ISIS, or ISIL, in Syria.  Sounds good, as we need to kill these representatives of evil in prompt fashion.

As NewsMax reported, President Barack Obama said Thursday's Senate vote to approve funding to train and equip Syrian rebels shows that Americans are united in fighting the Islamic State (ISIS).  The votes provides funding to train Syrian rebels, who may or may not be ready to take on ISIS.

Glenn Beck proposed the Obama administration is utilizing the ISIS threat to arm rebels whose ultimate goal is to overthrow Assad.  On the surface, toppling Assad, who is not a good guy, may be a reasonable objective, but their real story is real alarming.  Take a few moments to listen to Beck and his thoughts:



After absorbing this information for a few days, coupled with some investigation and study, the premise presented by Beck is deemed most credible. Beck was among the first, if not the only, to describe the goal of a caliphate in the middle east, and that is exactly where we are heading. 

I did not specifically recall the Sykes-Picot agreement. Essentially the old Ottoman Empire, the last time the Arab world had a united Islamic state led by a religious leader as Beck points out, was divided up into provinces or states that were to be under British and French control and influence to control and grow safe shipping lanes.  It was part of the agreement, however, where negotiated promises of the emergence of a kingdom united called Greater Syria failed to materialize, and this has led to Arab factions, enraged at being slighted, attempting seize control over the area to once again establish a single nation of under Islam; a caliphate.

Most of these groups are what we could consider to be terrorist in nature.  Those deemed non-believers who refuse to convert, are not given an opportunity to co-exist, but are labeled infidels and are most often killed.

Under the Obama administration, an objective of toppling dictators in this region opens up the avenues for upstart factions to effort to seize control and reach the goal of establishing the caliphate; a Greater Syria under the control of an Islamic religious leader.  Chaos has been the result thus far, not withstanding all the propaganda stating otherwise.  The events in Egypt are notably worth recalling.

Should a caliphate be established in the region, along the map of the old Ottoman Empire; if those in control operated without opposition this area, if not challenged, the mapping would not include Israel. Keep in mind there is little doubt of the hostility Obama holds toward Israel, and the Colonial powers of Great Britain and France. 

For those living under a tree, please be advised that Obama does not hold Uncle Sam in high regard either, having vowed to transform our nation, a nation he had noted is "based on a a charter of negative liberties, which says what the states can’t do to you, what the Federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf."

Define that as Obama finding America an oppressor nation, and although the premise is false, he aims to direct her transformation through efforts at level the playing field. 

Rather than misleading rhetoric, action dictates the marketplace, and Obama has had America orchestrate much of this mid east turnover and chaos, and turned a blind eye at a minimum to actions of countries and groups historically viewed as our enemies.

Last year, Obama spoke to the nation detailing how we must strike Syria and Assad as evidence pointed to their utilization of chemical weapons on their own people.  As it turns out, I believe, that was an orchestrated event hoping to win the minds of the American people and giving Obama the green light to take out Assad and open up Syria for the merchants of radical Islam.

Nobody bought it, and the imminent action failed to take place. The media failed to exhibit an ounce of intellectual curiosity as we quietly failed to take what would have been considered a seemingly appropriate action.

ISIS is now running roughshod over Iraq, having seized large tracts of territory, cash and our own abandoned military equipment, and they must be stopped.

Now, it does not seem our military has been specifically tasked with the destruction of ISIS ( is that not what you thought Obama finally engaged our forces to do? ), but rather to assist Syrian rebels who aim the overthrow of Bashar a-Assad. 

As Obama says, Assad must go. No, Mr. President, actually, ISIS must go.

Something is very wrong with this whole situation, and I fear many members of Congress are not up to speed with the historical significance of the Sykes-Picot agreement and I was not either, but thanks to the presentation by Glenn Beck and some research, it seems to all be alarmingly pieced together.

At one point just prior to Obama's regrettable election, we had the head of snake, Iran, in large measure surrounded.  Do you remember playing RISK?  Surrounding your enemy is good.

Now, under Obama's leadership, we are enabling enemies of state, arming terrorist organizations and helping to create the chaos necessary to fuel the flames of insurgency for those seeking freedom to overthrow vicious dictators, all of which escalates the power Iran yields.

You may think overturning these dictators is a worthy endeavor, and in many ways it is.  However, you must consider the ultimate objectives of the not only the fighters on the field, but those who organize their efforts.

As our Commander in Chief, we have the top dog in organization, but just what is he organizing?  It sure looks like a Greater Syria, where a united Islamic state can be once again ruled by a religious leader. In a sense, the Obama administration policies and ISIS have much the same goal, just approached in differing ways.

I do not have it all pieced together, but, although we are not playing RISK, I can recognize pieces are being placed.

Yeah, something is very wrong to be sure, and it is not workplace violence.

Freedom's Last Exit

Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free. --Ronald Reagan

America is under attack; make no mistake.

And while the threat from terrorists around the world is deadly real and increasing, our immediate concern must be to recognize and combat our most significant threat; one from within. The headlines are dizzy from spinning round and round to cover, albeit with a slanted left wing bias, it is imperative that we understand that the greater majority of the major issues we currently face are orchestrated events with cynical political motivations.

For those of us who love America, this makes no sense.

However, a large contingent of our citizenry, in large measure found in the progressive left, view Uncle Sam as a thief and an oppressor.  This includes individuals you may have become familiar with, including Bill Ayers and his wife Bernadine Dohrn, Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Noam Chomsky.

In his new movie "America", Dinesh D'Souza introduces you to a slew of them.

In addition, sadly, this includes many politicians, several of whom are Marxists, who in recent trips to Cuba and Venezuela, have proclaimed their preference for a socialist, at a minimum, government.

While many of these are lower level, it is clear that President Barack Obama is among them. After all, he ran proclaiming he would fundamentally transform America. In his first inaugural, Obama spoke of remaking America.  But as D'Souza points out, to remake America, you must first unmake America.

How would President Obama go about doing that without stirring up a citizenry that would certainly oppose such an endeavour if they were in command of the facts?

Having a media heavily invested in you, presenting propaganda to the public, would be quite and asset, and Obama has that.  Wrestling control of private sectors industries allowing crony capitalism would be beneficial as well, and with Obamacare, extensive energy regulatory actions, control of the money center banks and a sizable chunk of the auto industry, things are falling into place.

While crisis after crisis seemingly just appear, Obama does not solve these issues, but rather travels around campaigning against straw men who supposedly are at fault.  The proposed solution from Obama in these matters is always government oriented, which increases governmental control over those involved.

Reminds me of The Forgotten Man. Please see the following chart of The Forgotten Man, which has been brilliantly depicted in "The Forgotten Man" by Amity Shlaes:

Events that occur randomly, for which a potential political opportunity exists, are exploited. An example of such an event would be the school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut.  As Obama's former COS Rahm Emanuel said, 'never let a crisis go to waste".

However, the majority of these events are orchestrated and played, without the public knowing.  The best example of this is the recent rush of our southern border by children.  They did not get the command to start engines on their tricycles by osmosis.

But, why would the government create a series of crisis that are adverse to optimal prosperity of the citizenry?  Because the agenda of the anti-American progressive left is not the same as yours.

Their plans are well orchestrated, following Saul Alinsky tactics, in the implementation of the Cloward and Piven Strategy.  We have numerous posts on this strategy, but the following video essay is an outstanding overview.

Please review this in entirety, which will give you keen insight into why all these seemingly unprecedented events are taking place, with breaking news on a daily basis.



The end result of all this chaos is increasing government control over you, limiting your freedom and liberty.  Obama and his team of lawless liars are rolling high miles on the road they are traveling.

Few exit ramps remain.

What If?

What if?

What if America never existed?

Best selling author Dinesh D'Souza, whose recent work regarding the background, motivations  and misunderstood ambitions of President Obama has been compelling and spot on, teams with award winning producer Gerald Molen to bring us "America" The Movie, which hits movie theaters, appropriately, in approach of the July 4th holiday.  Take a look see at the trailer.



I believe our country was divinely inspired, with our founding fathers, brilliant men, risking their lives, fortunes and sacred honor, presenting us with a gift of liberty; lighting the flame of freedom. Throughout the history of our nation, we have certainly experienced a slew of growing pains. Our founders expected this, and expected the people to right the mistakes along the way.

As Ronald Reagan once said, this country was founded and built by people with great dreams and the courage to take great risks. 

George Washington, the indispensable man, was an exceptional individual who took many risks in the battles that helped give birth to our nation. What if Washington's armies failed in their effort to defeat the British?

In his new film, D'Souza examines that question among others.  Another question D'Souza pondered is whether American wealth based on theft and oppression?  D'Souza, as noted on his website, makes the moral case for capitalism.

Washington would have agreed, noting that a moral component "was a necessary spring of popular government".  Faith, hope and charity and the capitalist free market economic system, one which gives power to the people through liberty and freedom, is the heartbeat of our nation.

Reagan also said freedom is a fragile thing and is never more than one generation away from extinction.  It is not our by inheritance; it must be fought for and defended constantly by each generation, for it only comes once to a people.  Those who have known freedom and lost it never know it again.

As D'Souza noted, America is currently at a crossroads.  If America did not exist, terminated at any point along the way in our brief history, the world would be a very, very dark place with evil running roughshod.

America; imagine the world without her?  Check out "America" The Movie and find out!

High Treason

I should have seen something like this coming.  After all , it was a beautiful Saturday here in The City Beautiful, lovely downtown Orlando.

In the aftermath of what was labeled a prisoner exchange, there was President Obama in the Rose Garden with the parents of Bowe Bergdahl, who had reportedly been held captive for approximately five years by the Taliban.  After a series of flashbulbs for the optic, the real details of what had actually took place began to emerge.

Bowe's father, Bob Bergdahl, was gleefully given time at the podium by President Obama and proceeded to speak the Taliban language, with many thinking he was in code claiming the White House for Allah. Whatever it was, I found it offensive.

During the exchange, which was odd in many ways, Bowe Bergdahl seemed very comfortable with his captors.  This would seemingly make sense, since his US commanders, and fellow servicemen, are of the opinion he walked away from his platoon willingly.  Anti-American and military comments that had been posted by Bowe became public knowledge, and it became clear he likely was a deserter.

Meanwhile, Bob Bergdahl, during the captivity of his son, had become quite cosy with the Afghan people, utilizing his Twitter account with frequency.  In days prior to the swap, Bob tweeted he would continue to fight for the Afgahns and will work hard to close Guantanamo Bay.

In contrast, I fully support the continued captivity at Guantanamo Bay of those who wish harm on America.  Obama, not so much. 

To secure the "release" of Private Bergdahl,  President Obama granted the freedom of five top level Taliban leaders.  You read that correctly, five of the top Taliban leaders.

The Taliban 5 (click to enlarge)

Shock and outrage!  These are some of the adjectives describing the feelings of much of our citizenry over the release of five high level terrorists for what appears to be a deserter of our military. Many wondered why our administration would agree to do this?

Let me be clear.  President Obama is, at a minimum, sympathetic to the Muslim Brotherhood and Islamic interests.  Sadly, within our government, he is not alone.  Keep in mind that the parents of Huma Abedin, chief of staff for Hillary Clinton,  are high level members of the Muslim Brotherhood.

As Dinesh D'Souza had appropriately pointed out with sufficient empirical evidence, Obama views America as a bully, and oppressor on the world stage, and is seeking in his transformation to lower the presence of Uncle Sam, empowering those he views as oppressed providing assistance through angles he is comfortable in getting away with.

Actions speak louder than words.  We know Obama has been delivering weapons to the Taliban, which was the center of what happened in Benghazi, and now, we have what could be considered an act of treason by releasing known enemy combatants, whose motivation is to kill our servicemen, out into the arena of war once again.

I can only pray the injured soldiers, and the families of our veterans lost fighting the Taliban can take some comfort during this time, and know that many Americans stand with them, shoulder blade to shoulder blade. God Bless you all!

I do not know how you define aiding and abetting the enemy, but I find this action exactly that.  In addition, the official position of the United States is not to negotiate with known terrorists, which has obviously taken place.  Except, Obama does not view the Taliban as terrorists; rather freedom fighters.  Those freedom fighters are fighting against, you guessed it, us.

On a multitude of fronts, President Obama is failing as President, running an arrogant and lawless administration with destructive results.  But these actions, assisting known terrorist and enemies of the United States of America, should put his impeachment on the fast track.

In the words of liberal professor Jonathan Turley, Obama's "become the very danger the Constitution was designed to avoid".

Judge Jeanine Pirro, sharing our disgust in this matter, makes a compelling case for impeachment.

Executive Lawlessness

Executive Lawlessness is where we are as a republic in 2014, with our elected president operating outside the parameters of the funding principles of our nation; our rule of law.

We are a nation of laws, not of men, and unless this corrected quickly, the future of our once great nation is in great peril.

With our current president, the first indication of his imperial behavior began with the awarding of stimulus finding to the car companies, shafting the bond holders for the benefit of unions breaking long standing contract law, and authority he does not have.  Sadly, none of those with the power to restrain this illegal action took action to thwart it.

There are numerous instances of the executive branch targeting political opponents. Among those that quickly come to mind are the following:

*The administration going went hard after Gibson Guitar over a small issue involving wood importation that was never before found troublesome.  Gibson continues to fight back, and is actually scoring some points.

*Federal investigators raided Lumber Liquidators, LL:NYSE,  with the search said to involve special agents from the Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Department of Justice. It was suggested the investigation involved its importation of wood products.

*Under the EPA, the administration has embarked on major land grabs without congressional approval.  In addition, extensive action under the false premise of Global Climate Change has been enacted on the citizenry, again, without congressional approval

*The utilization of the IRS by the administration to target conservative organizations through illegal mechanisms hoping to ridicule, hassle and bankrupt, or significantly harm financially, through regulatory action, both legal and illegal.

*Reports have come to light  that Friends of Abe, a conservative group in Hollywood, has been under investigation by the IRS for over two years, underscoring how the bad the environment is for those who dare to challenge the administration.

With the election in full swing, Obama chief advisor Valerie Jarrett publicly claimed she would go after opponents of the administration.  Without fear of being held accountable for such illegal action, the administration has kept its word.

Recently, an indictment was handed down on filmmaker Dinesh D'Souza for campaign fraud.  D'Souza produced an acclaimed movie,  2016; Obama's America, which was not looked upon favorably by the administration, so this is not viewed as coincidence, rather politcal payback. Because of that, D'Souza had to be stopped; hence the felony indictment, which accuses D'Souza of making improper campaign donations.  While I find the work D'Souza has performed as extremely credible, character issues not unlike those of many Americans regarding D'Souza have surfaced, which likely were partially to blame for his recent resignation as president of Kings College in New York. Given the work D'Souza was engaged in, he should have been recognized the need to keep his life clean and more cognizant of the moving targets of campaign finance laws.

If they want to get, they can find a legal avenue to get it done, particularly under the IRS regulations and laws.  Even it your are ultimately found innocent, the financial cost to defend can be staggering, not to mention unmeasurable potentially punitive damage to your or your organizations reputation.

These are just examples of an imperial president who finds Congress a bother, and as an arrogant leader of the political ruling class, governs through executive order against the will of the people, the latter evidenced by the overwhelming unpopularity of the much maligned Obamacare.

While political opponents of Obama are under attack, violators of the the law, seemingly no matter how significant, are not held accountable, not only to the administration, but to our laws. Lois Lerner got promoted after the IRS debacle, but in a travesty of justice, former New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine, who commingled funds and lost customer in foreign currency arbitrage, walks double fisted in the Hamptons after perjuring himself in kabuki theater hearings in Washington.

Charles Krauthammer has had enough, and eloquently hammered Obama in a FOX News essay.  Please take a listen:



While Krauthhammer is completely correct, the problem is regrettably far deeper than the discussion with Dr. Krauthammer and Judge Andrew Napolitano waded.

What is most concerning are the amount of elected officials who appear to knowingly sanction the executive branch rendering the other branches of government essentially either intimidated pawns or or toothless adversaries.  With the balances of power under attack, there is little doubt the Founding Fathers would be appalled at this spectacle of executive arrogance and congressional complicity and or ineptitude.

Senator Ted Cruz, R:TX, who historically has fought for the Constitution against any and all who seek to execute outside its parameters, joined Glenn Beck this morning for an extremely relevant and timely discussion on the absence of rule of law under the Obama administration.  Please take a listen:
The issues surrounding Obama and his imperial presidency, the abuse of power and executive lawlessness are staggering, and are an imminent threat to the survival of our country.  Abuse of power in this regard should be swiftly dealt with by the people, no matter which party it happens under, evidenced by Sen. Cruz defeating President George W. Bush in court.

Although President Obama was reelected, if the public were able to decipher all the lies misrepresentation he put forth, coupled with extensive abuses of power, there is little doubt he would currently be president.

The principles given us in our founding documents are those we are governed by, not by the whims of an arrogant leader who aims to implement the dreams of his father against the will of our citizenry.

The rule of law is on life support, if not already dea. Sadly, few seem to care, and the executive lawlessness continues.

Victims We Know So Well

For many, the behavior of President Obama in recent weeks during the partial government shutdown has been an eye opener.  Seemingly in consult with advisor Valerie Jarrett, who vowed to punish enemies; petulant, spiteful, vindictive and punitive action by President Obama spread from his political opponents to affect factions of the entire citizenry.  Most took notice, and few were impressed.

Particularly noteworthy to many was not the closing of the national parks, but the spiteful behavior exhibited toward our veterans.  As despicable as it was for our President to deny military families death benefits and thwart our veterans aiming to visit the WWII Memorial, it was a stick in the eye to gleefully open the National Mall for an immigration rally with paid protesters to advocate for an open borders immigration policy.

While this behavior was simply stunning to many, for those of us who know who Barack Obama is, it came as no surprise. The mainstream media has been running cover since his election campaign began in 2008, and as such, Americans working harder by the day to provide for their families, perhaps got their first glimpse of the character, or lack thereof, of our Commander in Chief.

Dinesh D'Souza, with his work on Obama, most notably in his book "The Roots of Obama's Rage", has been informing the public for years the basis of the mindset President Obama operates from.

"What really motivates Barack Obama is an inherited rage—an often masked, but profound rage that comes from his African father; an anticolonialist rage against Western dominance, and most especially against the wealth and power of the very nation Barack Obama now leads. It is this rage that explains the previously inexplicable, and that gives us a startling look at what might lie ahead."

The summarization of the points made by D'Souza was in part enhanced this morning on FOX & Friends, when host host Steve Doocy interviewed Dr. Keith Ablow.  In analyzing the behavior and rhetoric recently employed by President Obama, Ablow came to some rather concerning conclusions.  Take a listen:



The analysis of Dr. Ablow regarding President Obama is extremely accurate. Behind the mask, Obama inside feels he was victimized as a youth, that minorities and the poor in this country have been penalized by those who have achieved wealth and prosperity, and he aims to right these perceived wrongs.  This is also true in his feelings about America; her history and prosperity, which he deems fraudulent.

Policies enacted by Obama have been of significant benefit to those who consider themselves victims, and the administration has encouraged many to become victims.  The exponential expansion of unemployment and disability benefits are prime examples.

These actions are in stark contrast to the tenants of individual freedom and personal responsibility outlined among our founding principles. The President is disempowering the citizenry, transforming wealth from those Obama has deemed have to victimized others to obtain to those who were supposedly victimized along the way. 

These are the victims he knows so well. Now you know him.

Obama Transcript of Failure or Compliance

Short on time with September 11 approaching, time for a worthy piece of reflection on our National Day of Mourning did not exist.  Instead, with the addition of a few sentences, I reposted my post from a year ago.

To be clear, the significance of that day still burns hot in my mind, as does my trip in early December 2001 to ground zero.  For me, and I am sure you, it is personal.

On the blog Facebook page, time was found to forward and comment on an a Reuters piece detailing how President Obama did not have time to grant a requested meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu due to a lack of scheduling opportunities.  Obama does have a tight schedule, campaigning hard in states the media proclaims he is safe in, with an appearance on David Letterman and a pow wow with rap star Pimp the Limp, whoever that may be.

On September 11 of all days, we thought the President should note that freedom will be defended in all ways legally permissible, from all enemies foreign, and domestic.

Meanwhile, it has been tough sledding for Netanyahu in dealing with Obama, who clearly has a strong disdain for both him personally and Israel itself.  A recent trip did not go well by all accounts, and with Israel in great peril due to the pursuit of nuclear weapons by Iran, Obama's concern for Israel is limited, although he has expressed some strategic influence as you may suspect.

Neatanhayu in recent trip to the White House/Photo Christina Fitzgerald

The middle east is a powder keg, with those who wish us harm emboldened by Obama, who they see as weak and somewhat accommodating to their plight.  Although Obama loves playing war games directing drone attacks, and several who had it coming to them got it, Obama is warm to the Muslim Brotherhood and desires America to be taken down a few notches, inclusive of wealth redistribution, as so thoroughly covered by Dinesh D'Souza in the movie 2016: Obama's America.

On the anniversary of the worst terrorist attacks ever perpetrated on America, no accident to be sure, in what the administration felt were protests due to an anti-Islamic movie someone posted on YouTube, coordinated attacks on our embassy in Cairo, Egypt and our consulate in Benghazi, Libya took the life our ambassador and three others.  For those on the golf course, this is an act of war.

These attacks were preceded by an official statement from our government offering an apology for individuals who are not up to speed on the warm fuzzy feelings the administration has for Muslim extremists.  Apologies and appeasement are not only going to fail to achieve anything, they will make things much worse.

The Muslim Brotherhood is now fully in charge in Egypt, and the Muslim Brotherhood is anti-Israel and no friend of the United States.  While Obama found it intoxicating to assist in taking our a pair of dictators in these countries, no apparent thought to the vacuum left behind was engaged.  It was not difficult to forecast the events that have transpired, and our leading from behind President has no answers to escalating violence in the region.

It is very hard to imagine anyone making Jimmy Carter look like Dwight Eisenhower, but Obama is giving it the college try, and we have a copy of these transcripts.  These events have that 1979 feel to it, and come to think of it, so do the issues with petroleum.

Then again, since D'Souza is correct, these events of a weakening US and the rise of Islamic nations may likely be the objective of Obama.  Certainly, the policies of weakness and appeasement and partnership with Islamic radicals are void of common sense, enhances their efforts and exponentially increases our risk, not to mention the place Israel find it self in.

For those of us against Islamic terrorists, we must get a change in leadership at first opportunity.  This change is imperative in our effort to protect and defend our freedoms and preserve the United States as a superpower in the world. 

As Sarah Palin said, "Since President Obama likes to “speak softly” to our enemies. If he doesn’t have a “big stick” to carry, maybe it’s time for him to grow one".  Obama will not, so we the American people, will have to act. 

Our first, and seemingly only, opportunity, is on November 6.   Freedom is at stake.

Which Dream Will We Carry?

Go see it!

Free time on the weekends is going to grow short with gridiron activity commencing in days from high school to the color and pageantry of NCAA College Football to the National Football League, so go see it today.

Although not enough of us saw it early on, those of us who understood Barack Obama did not see things regarding America the same way we did could not put our finger on why this was so. Even knowing the anti-American cats he hung with in his formative years, a basis for the disdain for our process could not be easily identified.

In an interview on the Glenn Beck Program a few years back, Dinesh D'Souza was able to explain the reasoning behind the effort Obama was seemingly making to take America down to the level of other countries, indeed a transformative initiative for wealth transformation.

D'Souza, who is from India, identified with the thought process because of his upbringing. With Obama continuously making policy decisions which seemingly are in contrast to long held positions by our government, many without the legislative process, upon hearing D'Souza lay it out, the whole thing makes total sense.

Now, with the help of award winning Hollywood producer Gerald Molen, D'Souza brings the story to the big screen in 2016: Obama's America.



This is most definitely a movie the White House does not want you to see, but it is playing to packed houses across America.

America is at a critical crossroad as this election approaches. With so much at stake, it is imperative you no longer treat your vote as spectator sport. It is time to gather intel to make an informed decision.

If you have been sitting out the political process, you must acclimate yourself to the candidates. With respect to Obama, love him or hate him, you likely don't know him. After you see 2016: Obama's America, you will.

With that knowledge, you will quickly note that his vision of America significantly varies from the principles set forth by our founding fathers of rights endowed to us by our creator of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness with limited government, and religious and economic freedom.

Therefore, Barack Obama must be defeated on November.  We must restore America, for our children and grandchildren, the dreams of our divinely inspired founding fathers, not that of our President who works to implement the dreams from his father; an anti- Colonialist, anti-American Kenyan Marxist.

You Don't Know Him

Love him. Hate him. You don't know him. Dinesh D'Souza has a new film coming out this week which is a must see for every American concerned about freedom.

Fresh off his book The Roots of Obama's Rage, D'Souza imagines what America would look like in 2016 should Obama win reelection in the film 2016: Obama's America.

 Please see the trailer:



Over his term, many decisions by Obama have been very puzzling to say the least. Efforts to decipher the thought process have failed to reveal a basis for his decision making. Dinesh D'Souza was able to find such a basis through portions of his own history, offering us a comprehensive look in his best selling book The Roots of Obama's Rage.

The root of the rage centered around the anti-colonialist beliefs held by Obama passed through to him as dreams from his father. Fast forward to today and D'Souza, along with famed producer Gerald Molen, present 2016: Obama's America, which is an eye opening tale demonstrating the basis of the hostile nature in which Obama engages America.

D'Souza speaks with Glenn Beck and outlines the startling discoveries he has made, which give guidance to the background Obama operates from.







The bottom line is that our President in no way shares the admiration for the founding of this country; the founding fathers, the history, the system of governance and documents we hold dear. Obama finds America as an overpowering oppressor, and he aims to to fulfill the dreams from his father, and his deep mentor Frank Marshall Davis, to knock America down through the redistribution of wealth to those he feels it was stolen from.

Cabalistic Commander in Chief

During the 2008 presidential election, the media failed to adequately vet Sen. Barack Obama, and thus, with many seeking a change from the Bush administration, place a bet on an inexperienced well spoken black man with soaring rhetoric full of promise.

For those of us who did the homework, we found it easy to recognize that this was not your parents customary Democrat. This was a narcissistic ideologue who did not see America as exceptional, but rather as an oppressor.

Dinesh D'Souza describes Obama, accurately in my view, as an anti-Colonialist in his book title The Roots of Obama's Rage. D'Souza points out Obama aims to use his fathers dreams as a blueprint for action, and these dreams call for America to be brought down for supposedly oppressing others along the way.

D'Souza recently spoke at CPAC, and offered a glimpse of a new movie coming this summer, which will forecast what America might look like in 2016 if Obama should win another term. Take a listen:



By almost any statistical measure, the Obama presidency has been abysmal. However, if you understand the mindset of Obama and how he sees our country and her place in the world, he would get high grades for the work he has done in transforming America.

Unfortunately, most Americans do regard America as exceptional and have been appalled at the actions of Obama. It is imperative he not get a second term, where unchecked and not accountable, irreversible damage would likely occur in the form of freedom lost and an economy overwhelmed by entitlements and governed from the top down in oppressive fashion.

1600 Anti Colonialism

A real head scratcher.

Trying to wrap your mind around the rash of horrendous decisions being made by the Obama administration rivals sloths multi tasking.

Among the disturbing actions of President Obama is the apparent disdain for the Colonial powers, particularly France and England. In addition, Obama has been very cold, is not adverse, to Israel.

Certainly, the majority of Americans, if they were not so immersed with who is being booted from American Idiot and recognized this contention, would not favor this position.

What is the mindset going on here with the President? An intellectual assessment of this position would not offer sane answers, that is unless, you were aware of some history. Specifically, the history of President Barack Obama.

Dinesh D'Souza, author of the book The Roots of Obama's Rage, joins Glenn Beck for some frank discussion of Obama's upbringing. I find this information presented compelling, and quite disturbing. Take a listen for yourself.

Obama publicly stands in support with Great Britain and Israel, but the actions, and they are plentiful and continuing, speak in volumes to the contrary. America stands with Great Britain and Israel, so if we have a anti colonialist Commander in Chief so adverse to our friends, he must be removed from office at the earliest legal opportunity.

Sarah Palin was quite correct. For a multitude of reasons, 2012 cannot come soon enough.

Civility Masks Loss of Liberty

Wasn't it just lovely. In the aftermath of the nauseating attempted assassination of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D:AZ), during the State of the Union last night we had Democrats and Republicans sitting with one another. A grand evening.

And, we all got a chance to witness evidence that President Barack Obama, by far the most radical Commander in Chief America has ever elected, recognize the error in his socialist agenda and pivot to the center. After all, the resounding and humbling defeat he and his agenda took in the mid terms served notice. Obama even read up on Ronald Reagan during his most recent vacation.

Good Grief! Are you always in confusion, surrounded by illusion?

While all this renewed civility is being tossed around, America is fast losing much of her liberty!

Obama is not moving to the center. Quite the contrary, he is doubling down on his agenda of social justice through the transformation of wealth. For those in doubt, Mark Levin sizes it up.

As noted by Trevor Loudon over at New Zeal, a foretelling analysis was put forth by Mark Rudd, detailing pages of the socialist in chief's playbook.

Obama is a very strategic thinker. He knew precisely what it would take to get elected and didn't blow it. He used community organizing methods to mobilize a base consisting of many people who had never voted before or who regularly don't vote....But he also knew that what he said had to basically play to the center to not be run over by the press, the Republicans, scare centrist and cross-over voters away. He made it.

You would have thought the emergence of his black liberation theology minister Jeremiah Wright would have alerted the masses. Or perhaps, letting the real agenda slip out in condescending Joe the Plumber.

Really, what's it like inside the bubble?

Rudd continued This is no stupid guy... Had any of the stupid Republicans read his books, they never could have said, "We don't know who this guy is." You know every thought he's ever had.

How true! If anyone had read Obama's books, it is easy to recognize what he meant by transforming America. Dinesh D'Souza writes of The Roots of Obama's Rage.

While the telepromter in chief continues to fool many with the media in full tow, acting as though he has lost on many of his targeted ideas of gevernmental control, you must watch the other hand.

Under executive order, no cloaking device is necessary as The EPA forges forward with climate change policy using regulation and taxation while the FCC, under net neutrality, is poised to control the dispensing of information. Investing in cost prohibitive measures, such as education and green energy initiatives, is code for more stimulus in an effort to, you guessed it, transfer wealth.

It must be stopped. Help is on the way, in the form of The Little River Band, who hit Hard Rock Orlando Thursday night, and Representative Paul Ryan, the smartest man in the room: