Enough is Enough!

'Enough Is Enough': Mark Levin Rails Against 'Radical' Dems, Media on 'Hannity'

Offensive

Security Concerns

Paid protesters at the direction of MoveOn.org (an organization Hillary Clinton helped start) forced the cancellation of a Donald Trump rally Friday evening in Chicago due to "security concerns".

Sen. Cruz sadly said "A campaign bears responsibility for creating an environment where the candidate urges supporters to engage in violence,"

Cruz is wrong.

Donald Trump is not to blame, the left is.

President Obama, the most divisive president perhaps ever, has created an environment which actively encourages division between race, class and economic standing. Trump accurately notes this, and those who are on the receiving end of the entitlements are prepared to initiate violence to keep them.

We appear to be carting a path similar to the election of 1968. Please pray for the safety of all our candidates, their supporters, the individuals who protect them, our police and our nation.

Free speech will not be silenced.

Angry Voices Must Be Heard Loud And Clear

President Obama, after promising brevity, spoke for hours praising himself for his perceived successes while a growing majority of the nation has finally caught on to the incredible failure of his administration to deliver freedom and prosperity, delivering what should be his last State of the Union address.

Without question, in his arrogance, Obama no doubt thinks the American citizenry is stupid and that all the problems facing our nation are in fact our fault.

It really is amazing, in a Nineteen Eighty Four sort of way.

Nikki Haley
R: South Carolina

Nikki Haley, Governor of South Carolina, who I have never had issue with, gave the GOP response, and it was truly eye opening. While she was eloquent and made some sound points, she also traveled in a direction that no doubt torqued the conservative wing of the party.

"We learned last night that the Republican establishment is very comfortable identifying themselves as elites and members of a club -- and that you can't get in just by being who you are and doing what you want to do as a Republican and pursuing what you believe in" said Rush Limbaugh.

It appears the GOP establishment, worried by Donald Trump and petrified of Ted Cruz, is making it's move.

As reported by Dustin Ulsterman of The Ulsterman Report, who is on top of the political spectrum like few others, "The Republican Establishment’s choice to be the next President of the United States, Florida Senator Marco Rubio, is said to have sent operatives to engage in off the books discussions with South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley last month. The meeting was the brainchild of two significant Republican donors who have indicated a strong desire to see both Rubio and Haley sharing the GOP 2016 ticket."

"This morning Governor Haley told NBC she was “open” to finding herself running as a Vice President for the 2016 Republican ticket. Interestingly, Haley also said in that very same interview she was intentionally calling out Donald Trump for what she termed, “…the siren call of the angriest voices.” Both the interview and its subject matter would indicate Mrs. Haley is happily doing the bidding of the GOP Establishment."

Once again, the GOP establishment turns it guns on those aiming to disrupt the governance of the elite ruling class with far more resolve than an anti-American president who is orchestrating the transformation of America.

It should tell you everything you need to know, and if you value America as founded, you should hit the campaign trail and voting booth with superior resolve and urgency.

Your angry voices must be heard loud and clear, while we still have freedom of speech.

New Normal of Newspeak

Orwell's "newspeak" is alive and well.

Perhaps defined as an orchestrated manipulation of language, thought, action and perception for the advancement of an agenda with punitive damages inclusive of public ridicule for those in opposition, political correctness is destroying our nation.

Those who champion political correctness proclaim tolerance for everything, while aiming to discredit and diminish the traditional principles, morality and prosperity of our nation.

While our society is welcoming and forgiving in nature, our nation cannot allow avenues of political correctness to supersede our guaranteed rights. The new normal of "newspeak" must be reversed.

As our founders noted, free speech and freedom of thought must be protected at all costs, for the survival of our nation is at stake.

Please see the follwong piece written by Jeff Deist of the Mises Institute: Political Correctness Is About Control, Not Etiquette

Progressives Use LGBT Movement to Control Citizenry

With ISIS running roughshod and terror in the air, and with an economy that looks fair with manipulated data but is incredibly fragile and on the brink of collapse, in recent weeks, issues surrounding those not heterosexual have dominated the news.  With age old common law and Christian values whipsawed from every angle, many of us feel we're climbing through the pages of Dr. Seuss's Inside Outside Upside Down.

There have been attacks on bakeries, who due to their religious  faith appropriately determined they would be unable to make a cake for a gay wedding.  A similar issue arose for a pizza parlor in the middle of nowhere that got attacked from all points across the globe. Quite a disturbance for such a limited amount of people.

Then, there is the sad tale of former Olympian champion Bruce Jenner, who has determined he is actually a woman and has begun making his transition, now referred to as Caitlyn.  I think he has major psychological issues, but I hope he finds peace.

These issues have not come to the forefront by accident.  Nobody was shocked the media was poised to promptly react as each of these issues became public knowledge.  Obama did not read about it in the news.

In fact, I deem the whole thing orchestrated.

I recall something I found interesting while watching the Celebrity Apprentice in 2012, noting that a disproportional amount of the charities designated by the contestants were associated with some arm of the LGBT movement. We posted here on BAHL Revere about this the time.

Vice President Joe Biden supposedly misspoke regarding Obama being a supporter of gay marriage, but that was not the case, simply presented that was to open the door for Obama, no doubt a man of principle, to change course once the wind changed direction allowing political expediency.  Same with Hillary Clinton, who for decades stood tall for marriage between a man and woman, citing it as a "bedrock principle".

These folks are liars.  They do not give a damn about gay people, although seemingly non-credible reports indicated both may be bisexual.  Both Obama and Clinton are using the LGBT movement, which again, represents approximately five percent of the population with a full stretch of the figures, to further their political ambitions.

And now, with the Supreme Court recently ruling in favor of same sex marriage, the slippery slope begins a frantic struggle for friction.

As famed economist and Hoover Institution Senior Fellow Thomas Sowell so eloquently stated recently stated in the supreme editorial pages of Investors Business Daily, "When any branch of government can exercise powers not authorized by either statutes or the Constitution, "we the people" are no longer free citizens but subjects, and our "public servants" are really our public masters. And America is no longer America. The freedom for which whole generations of Americans have fought and died is gradually but increasingly being taken away from us with smooth and slippery words".

The reasons for this embrace of the LGBT movement are plentiful; however, most notably,progressive activists in the United States want to use these kinds of laws to destroy free speech in America.  Hate speech is defined as speech that offends, threatens or insults groups, based on race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, disability, or other traits. There you have it, if your religion finds homosexuality offensive, and you think that, you have no doubt offended somebody, and this day and age, that somebody could force your incarceration.

I'll go ahead an offend someone, as I believe marriage is between a man and a woman, with same sex couples free to seek civil unions, allowing them equal rights under the law but not necessarily in the church.

Moving forward now, all legal forms must be altered, and for students filling out forms it will move to parent name rather than the name of the mother and father, diminishing the value of the traditional family. If churches fail to embrace the LGBT crowd, from performing marriages to hiring staff, even if this goes against traditional beliefs of the church, the churches risk losing their tax exempt status. Calls for the stripping of the tax exempt status have already begun.

Christian churches are officially under attack now, and will be set up to be in violation; however, you will not see such effort being made at any mosques.  Islam is being championed; left alone, however, Christianity is deemed unworthy by these elites as traditional America must be discredited and destroyed for the new socialist utopia of one world governance to take root.

Hate speech can fly vigorously aimed at those who don't share admiration for the LGBT community, with labels of bigotry and racism tossed about with little ramification. Free speech will be punished in the court of public affairs if it is deemed inappropriate by the wizards of doublespeak. 

If you own a private company, you will be declared ineligible for consideration for government contracts or dealings with government agencies if you are deemed to profess discrimination against the gay community, or for that matter, illegal immigrants.

If it were only gay marriage, that might be one thing.

However, the issue is never the issue with the left, and the floodgates of rewriting common law and destroying valued traditions with escalating government control is running roughshod, issuing punitive damage to those who dissent.

The LGBT crowd are useful idiots, utilized as a political mechanism by the progressive movement to gain control over the citizenry.  With the help of a rogue Supreme Court who deems themselves able to operate outside of the Constitution, these doors have just been kicked wide open.  

Gore Fits Obama's Controlling System

The anointing of Hillary Clinton as the 2016 Democratic nominee for president has ran into some quick sand, due to her failing to adhere to best practices she forced her staff to follow and violating the law by withholding correspondence and documents during her destructive tenure as Secretary of State.

Hillary Clinton, as we have previously noted on numerous occasions, is not worthy of holding higher office in our government.  Beyond being a socialist disciple of Saul Alinsky, she has no service of merit, had a disastrous tenure as Secretary of State with debacles with a Russia "reset" and oversaw the horrendous events of Benghazi.  She is an elitist member of the ruling class, and a liar.

Who knew long shot GOP presidential candidate Carly Fiorina would have the line of the month, noting that all the flying Ms. Clinton fancies as accomplishment is actually nothing more than an activity. BAM!

There will be those that will continue to love her no matter what; the ready for Hillary crowd.  These people are brainwashed idiots; our liberal friends who know so much that is not so.

The pundits backing Clinton are blaming the GOP for stirring up this trouble, part of the "right wing conspiracy" she claimed has been after her and her husband for decades.  If only it were true.

The GOP leadership is feckless, and would not know how to knock Ms. Clinton off her game if they had the playbook.  Sadly, as evidenced by the lack of measurable resistance to Obama, many must agree with policies she advances.

Famed author Ed Klein has it right.  It is Obama, and more specifically his henchwoman Valerie Jarrett, who is going after Hillary.  Obama and his backers are not supporting Clinton, thinking she is not leftist enough to continue the Obama policies, and are the ones who are attacking her campaign.

Jarrett has reportedly been in talks with both Elizabeth Warren and Martin O'Malley to step in as the preferred candidate after Clinton is disposed of.  But, there is one individual who, in his arrogance, would love to step in; Al Gore.

Gore is a complete buffoon to most, but to those progressive elitists who champion control over the people, the work Gore has put in in the arena of climate change is most appreciated. Should Gore ride in, it would immediately prompt America to debate global warming, which I deem among the greatest hoaxes of all time.

In the early pages of Cleon Skousen's Five Thousand Year Leap, government is accurately defined as "as system of ruling or controlling".  The American Founders measured political systems in terms of the amount of coercive power or systematic control which a particular system exercises over its people, with the yardstick not political parties, but political power.

Global Climate Change is a manufactured mechanism to, under a perceived fear of the unknown, seize an element of control over the people through measured deemed reasonable to combat the propagandized threat.

Gore claims the science is settled, although nothing could be further from the truth.

Just this week, Gore claimed those who disagreed with his "settled" science should be punished punitively. For all the moonbats who think Gore would be a ideal candidate, imagine for a moment how damaging his proposal to punish punitively those who disagree with government policy is to our founding principle of freedom of speech.

Gore, like Hillary Clinton and most certainly Barack Obama, claim to be fighters for the little people, but favor and implement polices that restrict freedom for all and provide substantial road blocks to those who are aiming to seize the personal freedom and achievement this glorious nation offers.

Think about giving some fish to eat, rather than teaching how to fish and become self sufficient.  Only those powerful enough to dish out entitlements are powerful enough to take them away.

And with the restrictions and regulations being placed on our corporations and citizens by elected officials who cannot predict when it will rain next, in the the name of Global Climate Change, expenses are increased and freedoms are indeed lost. This political power exercised over the people hurts the lower income people the most, the very people these leftist liars claim to be breaking their backs to help.

What would help is less government, which showers the people with freedom and liberty.

Assault of Freedom of Speech in Net Neutrality

If you thought Obamacare was a fraud perpetrated against the American people, wait until you come to grips with Obama's effort to take over the Internet.  Titled Net Neutrality, as reported in The Wall Street Journal, Obamanet promises to fix an Internet that isn’t broken.

As Ronald Reagan so eloquently pointed out, government does not solve problems, it subsidizes them.

So, why would the government aspire to takeover huge industries? To fundamentally transform The United States of America?

Certainly, there is the taxation angle which, for a government too big to stop feeding itself, would increase revenue.

However, the costs would be a drag on economic growth, which has been most elusive under the tyrannical Obama administration.  Recall from your economic study that the more you tax something, the less of it you get, and that is a limitation on consumer choice.  You pick and choose your utility company, right? 

Then, of course, there is the regulatory angle, where the government seizes control over the industry, arbitrarily deciding, for the good of the people, which crony capitalism "partner" best deserves to control information.

Paraphrasing Reagan once again, when the government gets involved, it won't be the system malfunctioning but somebody mishandling the machinery, seemingly by design.

If you were progressive Democrats, regulation and taxation seem to be an adequate reasoning for embarking on such an endeavor.  But, this group is not your parents Democrats, and from listening to Obama representatives speak in their own words, I fear, like Obamacare, we are not being told the real plan at work here.

Introduce yourself to Mark Lloyd, who we have discussed here on the blog previously.  The former Diversity Czar under Obama, Lloyd speaks lovingly about how a similar takeover of the free press in Venezuela hastened the "glorious revolution" which gave Hugo Chavez smothering power over his political enemies.  For the record, Venezuela is now in economic shambles, and freedom is scarce.

Simply put, the Obama administration claiming they need to gain control over the Internet to fix non-existent issues which would if needed be more efficiently dealt with in the private sector world of competition is nothing more than a vehicle to encroach upon your freedom of speech, taxing and regulating free market commerce while silencing political enemies.

We do not need Net Neutrality, and the Obama administration, in particular, has soundly demonstrated they cannot be trusted with such responsibility.  Channeling the freedom loving mind of Reagan once more, what we need to do in this country is to alter the economic situation by changing one simple two letter word economic control by government to economic control of government.

Our founding fathers spoke of limited government, and expansive government control was something they wrote and warned vehemently against. The government has taken control over finance, energy and health, each of which are far worse off since governmental infiltration, has taken aim at the right to bear arms and now is in direct assault on communications.  

We are rapidly losing the freedoms most claim to hold dear in this country, and America had better wake up quick. If this battle is lost, a tyrannical government limiting, not only your freedom of speech, but your overall freedom, will gain a most significant foothold, one which will likely never be able to be regained.  

The Whole Ball Game

“Free speech is the whole thing, the whole ball game. Free speech is life itself.”—Salman Rushdie

Michael Ramirez/Investors Business Daily

Park Net Neutrality

In the aftermath of the wave election last Tuesday, in which the Obama policies, each and every one of them, were soundly rejected, we enter a very dangerous time over the next two years as Obama finishes out his term, and possibly America as we know it.

However, the period prior to the GOP taking over the Senate in January is of particular concern as Obama will aim to get through all his progressive policies while he can, either through legislation, appointment or executive action.

President Obama will not waste any time, as evidenced by his endorsement of legislation of the Internet, often referred to as Net Neutrality.  Obama said "an open Internet is essential to the American economy, and increasingly to our very way of life."

USA Today reports In a written statement, Obama asked the Federal Communications Commission to "create a new set of rules protecting net neutrality," and to ensure that phone and cable companies will not be able "to act as a gatekeeper, restricting what you can do or see online."

The Internet is now perhaps the most significant avenue for freedom of speech the world has ever seen, and free from intervention of those who carry an agenda.

Obama wants to make the Internet a sort of utility, that is government regulated and taxed, similar to your phone or power service.  I am a big fan of those taxes on my phone, aren't you?

But as with the left, the issue is never the issue.

And the issue behind Net Neutrality is to control speech it deems unworthy, or those of political opponents. If you think that cannot happen, please get to know Obama's Diversity Czar, who has some thoughts on communication and democracy in America.  Here are some highlights from one or our previous posts:

Mark Lloyd

We need to take a moment to learn more about an early appointee by President Obama, Diversity Czar, Mark Lloyd.  Investors Business Daily, in an editorial in August of 2009, accurately depicted Lloyd as a disciple of Saul Alinsky and a great admirer of Hugo Chavez, who silenced freedom of speech as a dictator in Venezuela.  SOS Venezuela!

IBD references Glenn Beck, who points out Lloyd, in his 2006 book, "Prologue to a Farce: Communication and Democracy in America," wrote: "It should be clear by now that my focus here is not freedom of speech or the press. ... This freedom is all too often an exaggeration. ... At the very least, blind references to freedom of speech or the press serve as a distraction from the critical examination of other communications policies."

Alarmed yet? With Lloyd unleashed to implement his ideas, we would have the Fairness Doctrine on steroids.

David Horowitz, over at his Discover the Networks website, noted the following regarding Lloyd:
 

*Seeks to use "diversity" and "localism" as pretexts for shifting the political balance of talk-radio programming leftward.
*Suggests that private broadcasters should pay an annual licensing fee in an amount equivalent to their total yearly operating costs; that money, in turn, should be redistributed to public broadcasting stations.
*Opposes virtually any private ownership of media.
*Disciple of Saul Alinsky's tactics for revolutionary social change.
*Greatly admires Venezuela's Marxist President, Hugo Chavez.

So, we can conclude that, with respect to media operations, Lloyd much prefers governmental control of media outlets, vehemently opposing media outlets operating in the private sector. And much like his mentor Hugo Chavez, Lloyd thinks the government should determine what can be voiced or written on the said media outlets.

Lloyd is no longer with the Obama administration, but his influence, associations and philosophical doctrines remain, poised for implementation.  As Sen. Ted Cruz (R:TX) appropriately notes, Net Neutrality is "Obamacare for the Internet".

As The Blaze and many other outlets reported today, the Obama administration hid from the stupid public the real aspects of Obamacare to get it passed, and they are doing the same thing with Net Neutrality.

It is time for the stupid public to get smart; quickly.  Be advised that if Net Neutrality is implemented, you will not only potentially lose your voice and the opportunity to hear other voices, but a large amount of your freedom of speech, something once upon a time we fought to the death to preserve.

Ship of Fools Taking Water

Seemingly on a daily basis, I find that common sense has found itself aboard a sinking ship of fools who are drowning in a sea of irrelevance.

Bombarded by nonsense from the our government and their criminally complicit partners in the media, those relegated to the outer party are left so dizzy from tales of misrepresentation they don't know if they are inside outside or upside down.

Just this week, the mind boggling propaganda embarked upon in an effort to mask truly horrible employment numbers were worthy of rave reviews, if you are a numskull.  Anybody with ten minutes of economic theory recognizes the dismal place our economy, by orchestration, is in.

Then comes the absurd.  Except, this is real.

ABC reporter Jonathan Karl, who among this horrendous group of propagandists has a fair reputation, reports today that General David Petraeus, thought to be a moderate republican, has all but endorsed Hillary Clinton for president.

Given that it was Hillary Clinton and her MoveOn.org arm who labeled Gen. Petraeus "General Betray US" back during the Iraq war, this cannot be possible in the real world.  I know politics make strange bedfellows, but that attack was, beyond completely false, a real personal low blow, even for the Clintons.

Yes, I almost have to suspend belief on this one.



Gen. Petraeus and Hillary Clinton

However, as Karl reports; Petraeus has always shied away from politics, but in a new book he is quoted lavishing so much praise on Hillary Clinton, he seems to be endorsing her as a candidate for President.

“She’d make a tremendous president,” Petraeus says in the new book “HRC” by Jonathan Allen and Aimee Parnes.

And for Petraeus, Exhibit A in why she would be a tremendous president is the very thing for which Republicans most aggressively attack Clinton: her performance as Secretary of State when the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, was attacked.

“Like a lot of great leaders, her most impressive qualities were most visible during tough times,” Petraeus tells Allen and Parnes. “In the wake of the Benghazi attacks, for example, she was extraordinarily resolute, determined, and controlled.”

Gadzooks!  Did I read that last paragraph correctly?  We may want to revisit the ABC story just to be sure, in the event we were still feeling some residual from our last visit to the local watering hole.

Oh boy. Has he lost his mind?  Perhaps Petraeus has taken up residence in The Crackerbox Palace.

We know Petraeus was doing the horizontal bop with a sporting young chick which forced him to resign his position, but what on earth do these people have on him?  Somebody go find find Sandy Berger and look through his pants for those papers he stole from the national achieves for a clue.

Few have received such high praise for doing much of nothing than Hillary Clinton.  Obama immediately comes to mind; however, sadly, he was elected president.  Twice.

Although we could speak all afternoon about the scant leadership of Ms. Clinton, nothing comes close to not only the failure of leadership which resulted in the deaths of four American patriots in Benghazi, but her cold and callous reaction to the event, complete with lying to the families of the victims and the American people, which should eliminate her from holding higher office moving forward. 

Please recall, while addressing the families and the nation as the bodies our of slain patriots returned to Andrews AFB, both President Obama and then Secretary of State Clinton lied to all by falsely blaming the Benghazi events on some stupid video nobody saw.  Truly despicable behavior.

Petraeus certainly knows this, so there is little doubt the squeeze has been put on him.  The fact that these people command this type of power, placing limits of freedom of speech through intimidation, is a threat to our republic.

Liars and bullies who represent our country in elected office who have such limited respect for those they were elected to govern should be removed from office, and certainly should not be considered as a candidate for our highest office.

Obviously, Obama and Clinton and the power brokers who represent them apparently own General Petraeus.  The groundwork is being laid for the 2016 election, which may be the last opportunity to thwart the progressive movement.

Stand in the truth, and make sure you are not for sale, for those who are short in adherence to our founding principles are not only not worthy of your allegiance, but should be considered opponents.

You're Hired, Again!

With the world seemingly on edge, Donald Trump announced today that Miss California, Carrie Prejean, would keep her crown.

Since answering a question from the heart about gay marriage from a gay marriage activist nut case with a personal agenda, Prejean has been viciously attacked, beginning with a tirade from the activist judge on his website and astonishingly continuing from numerous sources across the globe.

Semi-nude pictures were published, but beyond the publishing of these pictures, the publishers went out their way to lambaste Prejean. First up to bat was The Dirty.com, followed by TMZ.com. "Bible Thumper", "Sinner" and "homophobic debutante" were among the verbal jabs.

Well, I hate to break to it these publishers and all the other proclaimers of hate against folks engaging their freedom of speech. This is America, and some of us do not support your cause, feel free to speak against you and will continue to do so while you firebomb us with your hate. Meanwhile, your antics are winning the hearts and minds of just about nobody.

Instead of hammering Miss California, maybe you could learn something from her.




H/T GATEWAY PUNDIT BLOG

I think Miss Prejean has quite a future ahead of her. As Trump said, she is quite beautiful and I grow more impressed with her after every public appearance she makes!